Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Euro Surveill ; 19(9)2014 Mar 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24626207

RESUMO

During the 2013/14 influenza season in Canada, 631 of 654 hospitalisations for laboratory-confirmed influenza enrolled in sentinel hospitals were due to Influenza A. Of the 375 with known subtype, influenza A(H1N1) accounted for 357. Interim unmatched vaccine effectiveness adjusted for age and presence of one or more medical comorbidities was determined by test-negative case-control design to be 58.5% (90% confidence interval (CI): 43.9-69.3%) overall and 57.9% (90% CI: 37.7-71.5) for confirmed influenza A(H1N1).


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/isolamento & purificação , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/virologia , Laboratórios , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estações do Ano , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem
2.
Vaccine ; 29(10): 1921-8, 2011 Feb 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21219987

RESUMO

A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial of a nasally administered inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine formulated with partially purified meningococcal outer membrane proteins (OMP-TIV) was conducted in 1349 healthy adults aged 18-64 years. Subjects received either vaccine containing 15 µg of haemagglutinin (HA) of each of three influenza strains for the 2003-2004 season on days 0 and 14, or 30 µg on day 0 and saline placebo on day 14, or placebo on days 0 and 14. Vaccination was well tolerated, with similar reactogenicity as placebo. Compared to placebo, statistically significant increases in mean serum haemagglutinin inhibition reciprocal titers and salivary secretory IgA to all 3 antigens were seen on day 28 for both vaccine dose groups. The incidence of culture-positive influenza and fever >37.8°C and cough and one or more of sore throat, runny nose or nasal congestion, muscle or joint ache, headache, fatigue, or chills or culture positive influenza and at least two of these symptoms was low (16/1349; 1.2%). In the intent-to-immunize population too few febrile culture-confirmed illness events (n=4) occurred to perform analysis. Fever occurred infrequently, even in the presence of positive cultures and disabling multi-symptom disease. In participants receiving all doses of either vaccine regimen the incidence of culture-confirmed influenza with respiratory symptoms and with or without fever was 0.77% (7/904) vs. 2.03% (9/443) in placebo recipients (p=0.045, Fisher's exact test; relative risk reduction 62%), despite circulation of a drift variant A/H3N2 that was poorly matched to vaccine. An OMP-TIV vaccine was well tolerated and reduced risk of symptomatic culture confirmed influenza. Vaccine efficacy will need to be validated in a season with a higher attack rate.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Proteínas da Membrana Bacteriana Externa/administração & dosagem , Proteínas da Membrana Bacteriana Externa/isolamento & purificação , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Humanos , Imunidade nas Mucosas , Imunização Secundária/métodos , Imunoglobulina A Secretora/análise , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neisseria meningitidis/química , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Saliva/imunologia , Fatores de Tempo , Vacinação/métodos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 31(2): 355-68, 1998 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9635910

RESUMO

With the introduction of piperacillin/tazobactam to the North American market, hospitals have been faced with the task of making a decision regarding its formulary role. In view of its broad spectrum of activity, piperacillin/tazobactam could be considered as a formulary alternative to imipenem. To evaluate the formulary feasibility of substituting piperacillin/tazobactam for imipenem, a comparative assessment of these agents in the empiric treatment of serious bacterial infections was undertaken at this tertiary care hospital. This trial was conducted as a randomized, double-blind, single-center study. Consenting adult patients (>16 years of age) who were prescribed imipenem were randomized to receive either 4 g of i.v. piperacillin/tazobactam or imipenem 500 mg of i.v. Q6H with or without concurrent antibiotics. Doses were adjusted according to renal function. There were no restrictions regarding the use of nonstudy antibiotics before and during the study period. Patients with beta-lactam allergies or meningitis or who had received greater than 72 h of previous imipenem therapy were excluded. Patients were evaluated at the end of treatment, at discharge, and at 30 days postdischarge. Endpoints included both clinical and microbiologic efficacy as well as drug toxicity. Over the 433-day study period, 360 imipenem treatment courses were initiated. Of these, 150 treatment courses (75 piperacillin/tazobactam courses and 75 imipenem courses) met study criteria and were subsequently randomized. The distribution of prescriber services for enrolled patients was similar to that for all patients receiving imipenem during the study period (p = 0.15). Also, there were no statistically significant differences in demographic parameters between enrolled and excluded patients. For those patients enrolled in the study, demographic characteristics, treatment course indication(s), and accompanying antibiotics were similar across treatment arms. The mean duration of study drug therapy was 7.7 days (SD, 6.2) for imipenem and 7.5 days (SD, 6.7)for piperacillin/tazobactam (p = 0.84). In the majority of cases, treatment discontinuation occurred as a result of a favorable treatment course outcome, stepdown to a narrower spectrum parenteral agent, or stepdown to an oral agent and did not differ between study drugs (p = 0.73). Clinical and microbiologic treatment course outcomes were also similar across treatment arms. Clinical outcome was deemed successful or improved for 68% of imipenem and 70% of the piperacillin/tazobactam treatment courses (p = 0.54). Fifty-three percent of treatment courses were microbiologically confirmed. Of the 58 courses that were assessed for microbiological outcome, 93% demonstrated successful eradication of the causative pathogens. There was no difference between study drugs (96% imipenem; 90% piperacillin/tazobactam; p = 0.61). The proportion of treatment courses with at least one adverse event was similar between the study drugs (p = 1.0). Nausea and/or vomiting were/was observed more commonly in the imipenem arm (p = 0.03). Discontinuation of therapy due to drug toxicity occurred in 16% of imipenem and 5% of piperacillin/tazobactam treatment courses (p = 0.06). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean treatment course cost for imipenem ($762; range, $55-$3192) versus piperacillin/tazobactam ($696; range, $79-$2967; p = 0.59). In summary, piperacillin/tazobactam seems to represent a suitable alternative to imipenem for several clinical indications including intraabdominal infections, pneumonia, febrile neutropenia, and skin/soft tissue infections in which the causative pathogens are susceptible. However, in view of the prevalence of multiresistant Gram-negative aerobic pathogens at this institution, we do not believe that imipenem can be removed from the drug formulary. In addition, at the currently studied dosing regimen, there seems to be no evidence of a direct cost advantage associated with


Assuntos
Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapêutico , Imipenem/uso terapêutico , Ácido Penicilânico/análogos & derivados , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Piperacilina/uso terapêutico , Tienamicinas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Método Duplo-Cego , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Ácido Penicilânico/uso terapêutico , Tazobactam , Resultado do Tratamento , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases
6.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 29(3): 155-65, 1997 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9401808

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to assess the prophylactic efficacy of cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, and metronidazole-gentamicin in colorectal surgery. A double-blind, randomized prospective clinical trial design was used in a Canadian tertiary care teaching hospital. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups and received three doses of a study drug (30 min preoperative and 2 postoperative doses at 12 and 24 h). Cefoxitin and ceftizoxime were given as 1000-mg doses. Metronidazole-gentamicin was given as 500 mg of metronidazole plus 120 mg of gentamicin in a minibag. High-risk patients (bowel ischemia, diabetic, current steroid use, etc.) received 10 postoperative doses. Patients with infections, prior antibiotics, or study drug allergies were excluded. Over 30 months, 153 patients were enrolled. Thirty-one patients were excluded for protocol violations. Of the 122 evaluable patients (38 ceftizoxime, 45 metronidazole-gentamicin, 39 cefoxitin), there was no difference across groups regarding sex, age, weight, preoperative Apache II score, and prior history of bowel surgery. Groups were equivalent regarding surgeon, nursing unit, high-risk status (six ceftizoxime, seven metronidazole-gentamicin, seven cefoxitin), bowel preparation, and procedure (including blood loss, drains, organ injury, intraoperative complications). Clinically significant infection requiring systemic antibiotics (7-day hospital and 30-day follow-up) was identified in 0% of ceftizoxime, 15% of metronidazole-gentamicin, and 26% of cefoxitin receiving patients (p = 0.005). Mean ASEPSIS scores for each group were 2.3 (range 0-15) for ceftizoxime, 9.2 (range 0-45) for metronidazole-gentamicin, and 10.4 (range 0-75) for cefoxitin (p = 0.01). Ceftizoxime patients tended to have a shorter total hospital stay (12.2 days versus 19.7 days for cefoxitin versus 13.9 days for metronidazole-gentamicin; p = 0.04), although the procedure to discharge interval was not significantly different (p = 0.09). There was no difference in clinical outcome according to risk status. Anaerobic bacteria were observed more commonly in the ceftizoxime and cefoxitin groups, whereas enteric Gram-negative aerobes were observed most often in the metronidazole-gentamicin group. The study regimens were generally well tolerated. Drug costs were equivalent between ceftizoxime and cefoxitin and lowest with the metronidazole-gentamicin regimen. Ceftizoxime appears to be more effective for the prevention of infection in colorectal surgery than either cefoxitin or metronidazole-gentamicin in the dosage regimens studied.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cefoxitina/farmacologia , Ceftizoxima/farmacologia , Cefalosporinas/farmacologia , Cefamicinas/farmacologia , Colo/cirurgia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Gentamicinas/farmacologia , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/farmacologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Reto/cirurgia
7.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 40(1): 70-4, 1996 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8787882

RESUMO

Antibiotics have been shown to reduce the incidence of wound infections after elective biliary tract procedures. Cefazolin and cefoxitin are among the agents most commonly promoted for this purpose. Cefoxitin has been substituted with ceftizoxime in many institutions; however, the role of ceftizoxime as a prophylactic agent in this setting has not been determined. To assess the comparative prophylactic efficacies of cefazolin and ceftizoxime in biliary tract surgery, we conducted a double-blind, randomized prospective clinical trial in a tertiary-care teaching hospital. Adult patients were randomized to one of two treatment groups and received a 30-min preoperative dose of study drug and as many as two postoperative doses at 12 and 24 h, depending on hospitalization status. Cefazolin and ceftizoxime were given as 1,000-mg doses. Patients with infections, those receiving prior antibiotics, or those with beta-lactam allergies were excluded. Over the 19-month study tenure, 167 patients were enrolled. Seventeen patients were excluded from analysis because of protocol violations. Of the 150 evaluable patients (72 and 78 receiving cefazolin and ceftizoxime doses, respectively), there was no significant difference among groups regarding sex, age, weight, preoperative Apache II score, baseline chemistry, and hematological parameters. Groups were also equivalent regarding the surgeon, type of procedure, characteristics (blood loss, drains, organ injury, and complications), and duration of hospital stay (mean, 5.6 versus 4.3 days [P = 0.31]). No clinical evidence of infection (7-day hospital stay and 30-day follow-up) was identified in 93% of cefazolin and 92% of ceftizoxime patients (P = 1.0). Microbiological confirmation was found in only 18% of primary-site infections. In conclusion, cefazolin and ceftizoxime appear to be equivalent for the prevention of infection in biliary tract surgery with the dosage regimens studied.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Ceftizoxima/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cefazolina/efeitos adversos , Cefazolina/economia , Ceftizoxima/efeitos adversos , Ceftizoxima/economia , Cefalosporinas/efeitos adversos , Cefalosporinas/economia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 12(3): 245-8, 1983 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6630107

RESUMO

Twenty-eight patients, 24 men and 4 women, aged between 17 and 72 years old, and suffering from chronic osteomyelitis (19), mastoiditis (5), or serious wound infections (4) were treated for an average of 35 days with netilmicin at doses of 2.4 to 6.9 mg/kg/day. The total dose of netilmicin given to each patient ranged from 3700 to 23 220 mg. Although the renal function was initially normal in all patients and stayed normal throughout therapy in all patients with no underlying disease, netilmicin nephrotoxicity was detected in two diabetic patients (7.6%). Vestibular toxicity developed in two (7.6%) but no change in audiograms was noted. Long-term therapy was associated with a significant increase (P less than 0.001) in half-life, from 1.5 to 1.9 h, and AUC 7.9 to 13.1 mg/l/h.


Assuntos
Complicações do Diabetes , Gentamicinas/efeitos adversos , Netilmicina/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Netilmicina/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...