Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Contin Educ Health Prof ; 42(1): e88-e91, 2022 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34459438

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Rapid and accurate detection of the novel coronavirus using a nasopharyngeal specimen requires training for professionals who may have limited experience. To respond to the urgent need, an interprofessional team created a just-in-time (JIT) module to provide only what was needed, precisely when needed, and rapidly deployed training sessions to a large group of health professionals. METHODS: In April and May 2020, health professionals from the hospital, ambulatory clinics, and public health attended training. Procedural comfort/knowledge and perception of the training were assessed with pre-survey and post-survey. RESULTS: Comfort level in collecting a nasopharyngeal specimen among participating health professionals increased from 2.89 (n = 338) on the pre-survey to 4.51 (n = 300) on the postsurvey on a 5-point scale. Results revealed a significant difference (P < .01) between pre-post knowledge questions regarding the correct angle and depth of the swab to obtain an adequate sample from the nasopharynx. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that a JIT intervention can improve knowledge and comfort regarding the nasopharyngeal swab procedure. In preparation for the prevention and mitigation of future viral outbreaks (ie, coronavirus and influenza), educators should consider creating JIT skills training for health care professionals who may be deployed to assist in mass testing efforts.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Treinamento por Simulação , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Teste para COVID-19 , Humanos , Nasofaringe , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos
2.
Cureus ; 13(6): e15944, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34336443

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION:  The spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is controlled by timely detection of infected patients using a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab test, followed by isolation and treatment. One challenge encountered with NP swab collection was to train healthcare providers (HCPs) with different training backgrounds and experience for collecting NP swab specimens across Nebraska, including a sizeable rural area. In-person training for NP swab collection skills was challenging due to social distancing. We developed a Just-In-Time-Online Training (JITOT) and delivered it using Facebook Live (TM) to meet our HCPs' training needs. METHODS:  Online training was held on April 21, 2020, and attended by 453 HCPs. A quasi-experimental study based on a survey and a multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) was conducted to evaluate its effectiveness in improving the participants' knowledge and attitudes. RESULTS:  Group mean knowledge score increased from a pre-test score of 57%-95% in the post-test showing a large effect size (Hedges' g = 0.976877). On a five-point Likert scale, the majority (86.21%) of the survey respondents agreed/strongly agreed that this training increased their overall comfort for nasal swab specimen collection as compared to their pre-training comfort (37.93%) with this procedure. The majority of respondents (96.55%) in the post-training evaluation agreed/strongly agreed that "the delivery method was appropriate." CONCLUSION:  A JITOT session is helpful to teach, demonstrate, clarify doubts, and improve the knowledge and comfort of the participants. It can be quickly delivered using a free social media platform for broader outreach during public health emergencies.

3.
J Trauma Nurs ; 14(3): 144-51, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18080578

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The study objective was to validate prehospital indicators mandated by the Ohio legislature. METHOD: The design was a retrospective case review using adult and pediatric tools developed to assess prehospital documentation of anatomic and physiologic indicators of significant trauma. RESULTS: There were 400 adult records with Glasgow Coma Score, the most frequently cited (23.5%). Fifty-four percent of the adult cases had at least 1 item checked. There were 104 pediatric cases reviewed, where 49% of the cases had at least 1 indicator checked. CONCLUSIONS: The mandated trauma indicators appear to be valid measures for use in trauma research.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/legislação & jurisprudência , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Triagem/legislação & jurisprudência , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ohio/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Triagem/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...