Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Urol Pract ; 9(5): 405-413, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37145712

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Radium-223 was approved for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer based on the ALSYMPCA trial. We characterize radium-223 treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in a large equal access health system. METHODS: We identified all men within the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System who received radium-223 between January 2013 and September 2017. Patients were followed until death or last followup. We abstracted all treatments received prior to radium; no treatments after radium were abstracted. Our primary aim was understanding practice patterns, and secondary outcome was the association between treatment pattern and OS measured using Cox models. RESULTS: We identified 318 bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients who received radium-223 within the VA Healthcare System. Of these patients 277 (87%) died during followup. The 5 predominant treatment patterns that encompassed 88% of patients (279/318) were 1) androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA)-radium, 2) docetaxel-ARTA-radium, 3) ARTA-docetaxel-radium, 4) docetaxel-ARTA-cabazitaxel-radium and 5) radium alone. Median OS was 11 months (95% CI 9.7-12.5). Men who received ARTA-docetaxel-radium had the worst survival. All other treatments had similar outcomes. Only 42% of patients completed the full 6 injections; 25% received only 1 or 2 injections. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the most common radium-223 treatment patterns and their association with OS within the VA population. The better survival in ALSYMPCA (14.9 months) vs our study (11 months) along with 58% of patients not receiving the full radium-223 course suggests radium is being used later in the disease course in the real world in a more heterogeneous population.

3.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med ; 52(5): 630-636, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26616359

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Following a spinal cord injury, patients are often burdened by chronic pain. Preliminary research points to activation of the motor cortex through increased mobility as a potential means of alleviating postinjury chronic pain. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between pain severity and mobility among patients who have sustained a traumatic spinal cord injury while controlling for clinically-relevant covariates. DESIGN: A multi-center, cross-sectional study. SETTING: The SCIMS is composed of 14 centers, all located in the United States and funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). POPULATION: The study cohort included 1980 patients who completed the one-year SCIMS follow-up assessment between October 2000- December 2013. METHODS: A multi-center, cross-sectional study was performed to assess the impact of mobility on self-reported pain using information from 1980 subjects who sustained a traumatic spinal cord injury and completed a year-one follow-up interview between October 2000 and December 2013. Patient information was acquired using the Spinal Cord Injury National Database, compiled by the affiliated Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems. Analyses included a multivariable linear regression of patients' self-reported pain scores on mobility, quantified using the CHART-SF mobility total score, and other clinically relevant covariates. RESULTS: After controlling for potential confounders, a significant quadratic relationship between mobility and patients' self-reported pain was observed (P=0.016). Furthermore, female gender, "unemployed" occupational status, paraplegia, and the presence of depressive symptoms were associated with significantly higher pain scores (P<0.02 for all variables). Statistically significant quadratic associations between pain scores and age at injury, life satisfaction total score, and the CHART-SF occupational total subscale were also observed (P≤0.03 for all variables). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with moderate to high levels of mobility, pain scores decreased with increasing mobility. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Enhancing a patient's physical activity by increasing his or her mobility may reduce neuropathic pain if begun shortly after a spinal cord injury.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Limitação da Mobilidade , Neuralgia/reabilitação , Qualidade de Vida , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia/fisiopatologia , Medição da Dor , Paraplegia/diagnóstico , Paraplegia/psicologia , Paraplegia/reabilitação , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Quadriplegia/diagnóstico , Quadriplegia/psicologia , Quadriplegia/reabilitação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/psicologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 50(10): 3216-21, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22814461

RESUMO

Respiratory virus infections cause significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Timely diagnosis is needed to provide optimal clinical care. Diagnostic tests routinely available at most institutions are limited by poor sensitivity and a slow turnaround time. We collected 90 respiratory samples from 87 immunocompromised patients (56 bronchoalveolar lavage and 34 nasopharyngeal aspirate samples) in order to compare the performance of routine respiratory virus testing available at our institution to the FilmArray respiratory panel assay, a novel diagnostic tool which utilizes multiplex PCR to test for 21 respiratory pathogens with a 1-h turnaround time. Samples with discordant results and 13 samples with concordant results underwent further verification testing by laboratory-developed real-time PCR. The FilmArray assay identified viral pathogens in more samples than did clinical testing (30/90 versus 16/90; McNemar P = 0.001). Most of the additional viral pathogens identified by the FilmArray respiratory panel assay that were confirmed by verification testing were pathogens not assessed by routine clinical tests, including rhinovirus/enterovirus, human metapneumovirus, and coronavirus. The FilmArray respiratory panel assay allowed for increased identification of respiratory viral pathogens in this cohort of immunocompromised patients.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Viroses/diagnóstico , Vírus/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Virologia/métodos , Vírus/classificação , Vírus/genética , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...