A Comparison of Precision and Safety using Three Recognized Ultrasound-Guided Approaches to Cervical Medial Branch Blocks: A Cadaver Study.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) guidance is widely used for needle positioning for cervical medial branch blocks (CMBB) and radiofrequency ablation, however, limited research is available comparing different approaches. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the accuracy and safety of 3 different US-guided approaches for CMBB. STUDY DESIGN: A cadaveric study divided into ultrasound-guided needle placement and fluoroscopy evaluation stages. SETTING: Department of Pathology, Forensic, and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University. METHODS: Sonographically guided third occipital nerve (TON), C3, C4, C5 and C6 medial branch injections and radiology evaluations were performed.The 3 approaches compared were:1. ES (published by Eichenberger-Siegenthaler): US probe in the coronal plane to visualize the cervical articular pillars, needle approach out of the plane, from anterior to posterior.2. Fi (published by Finlayson): US probe in the transverse plane to visualize a cervical articular pillar and its lamina, needle approach in the plane, from posterior to anterior.3. FiM (Modified Finlayson approach): Needles are placed as in Fi, but then adjusted with a coronal view of the cervical articular pillars.Fluoroscopy images were taken and later evaluated, for "crude", "high precision" and "dangerous" placement. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-five needle placements were assessed (10 were excluded, as no anterior-posterior fluoroscopy images were saved). Interobserver agreement on position of needle placement between the 5 observers was very high; the Fleiss' Kappa was 0.921. For crude placement, no significant differences were identified between various approaches; (77.6%, 79.5%, and 75.6% for the ES, Fi, and FiM respectively). However, for placement in predefined high-precision zones, ES resulted in significantly more success (ES: 42.9%, Fi: 22.7%, and FiM: 24.4%, P = 0.032). Fi and FiM resulted in no dangerous placements, while ES led to the potential compromise of the exiting nerve root and vertebral artery on three occasions. In 10% of the placements, the levels were identified wrongly, with no difference between the various approaches. LIMITATIONS: Feedback from a live patient, may prevent some existing nerve root injections, unlike in a cadaver. Though a higher number of needles were placed in this study than in most available publications, the number is still low at each individual medial branch level. CONCLUSION: Fi proved safer than ES. Fi was equally successful in targeting the articular pillar, however, ES proved the most successful in placing the needle in the center of the articular pillar. Adding another, (coronal) US view to check needle position in FiM did not improve safety or precision. Identifying CMB levels with the US is challenging with all approaches, therefore we still recommend using fluoroscopy for level identification. While there were pros and cons with either procedure, the efficacy findings of previous papers were not replicated on elderly cadavers with arthritic necks.

Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Lumbar Zygapophyseal Joint Pain Using a V-Shaped Active Tip Needle: An Observational Retrospective Study.

Background: Lumbar zygapophyseal joint dysfunction represents one of the major sources of chronic low back pain. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using a V-shaped active tip needle may offer a larger lesion of the medial branch nerves, improving clinical outcome. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and the feasibility of RFA using V-shaped active tip needles. Methods: This is a single-center observational retrospective study. Clinical records were screened and analyzed if they met the following inclusion criteria: adult patients (>18 years), diagnosis of chronic lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain, failure of conservative treatments, ability to provide informed consent for data analysis and publication. Exclusion criteria: lumbar pain not related to zygapophyseal joints, previous spinal/lumbar surgery, incomplete data, absence or withdrawal of informed consent. The primary outcome of the study was a change in pain intensity at follow-up. The secondary outcomes were the evaluation of quality-of-life improvement, the occurrence of adverse events and the impact on post-procedural analgesic consumption. For these purposes, pre- and post-treatment numeric rating scale (NRS), neuropathic pain 4 questions (DN4), EuroQoL - EQ-5D-3L, EQ-VAS, EQ-index and North American Spine Society (NASS) index were retrieved and analysed. Results: Sixty-four patients were included. 7.8% of patients at 1-month (CI95% 0.026, 0.173), 37.5% at 3-month (CI95% 0.257, 0.505), 40.6% at 6-month (CI95% 0.285, 0.536) and 35.9% at 9-month (CI95% 0.243, 0.489) follow-up reported a reduction of more than 80% in NRS Statistical analysis indicated a significant change in NRS, DN4, EQ-index and EQ-5D-VAS (p-value <0.001) at the different time-points. Conclusion: RFA using a V-shaped active tip needle might be a feasible and effective treatment for chronic lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain.

Whiplash injury successfully treated with prolotherapy: a case report with long-term follow up.

Background: Chronic whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) can develop after flexion/extension injuries and may be refractory to standard-of-care therapies. Aim: To present successful treatment of severe, longstanding, treatment resistant WAD with prolotherapy. Materials & methods: Four, monthly sessions of fluoroscopically guided prolotherapy with phenol-glycerin-glucose. Electronic data on pain (visual analog score), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), pain interference, depression, anxiety, sleep and quality of life were collected with University of Washington's (WA, USA) online tool for a total of 21 months. This study conforms to the Case Report Guidelines (CARE). Results: Significant improvement was achieved and maintained through 18 months after treatment in all assessed pain and functional measures. Conclusion: Regenerative medicine, including prolotherapy may be an appropriate treatment option for carefully selected patients with WAD.