Impact of acute care surgery on timeliness of care and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature

Background: Dedicated emergency general surgery (EGS) service models were developed to improve efficiency of care and patient outcomes. The degree to which the EGS model delivers these benefits is debated. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify whether the EGS service model is associated with greater efficiency and improved outcomes compared to the traditional model. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science (Core Collection) databases from their earliest date of coverage through March 2017. Primary outcomes for efficiency of care were surgical response time, time to operation and total length of stay in hospital. The primary outcome for evaluating patient outcomes was total complication rate. Results: The EGS service model generally improved efficiency of care and patient outcomes, but the outcome variables reported in the literature varied. Conclusion: Development of standardized metrics and comprehensive EGS databases would support quality control and performance improvement in EGS systems.

Contexte: Des modèles dédiés de services de chirurgie générale d'urgence (CGU) ont été développés pour améliorer l'efficience des soins et les résultats chez les patients. On ne s'entend toutefois pas sur l'ampleur des bénéfices conférés par le modèle CGU. Nous avons procédé à une revue systématique de la littérature afin de vérifier si le modèle CGU est associé à une plus grande efficience et à de meilleurs résultats comparativement au modèle classique. Méthodes: Nous avons interrogé les bases de données MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus et Web of Science (collection centrale) depuis la plus ancienne couverture du sujet et jusqu'à mars 2017. Les paramètres principaux pour l'efficience des soins étaient le temps de réponse, le délai avant l'intervention et la durée totale du séjour hospitalier. Le paramètre principal pour l'évaluation des résultats chez les patients était le taux de complications total. Résultats: Le modèle de service CGU améliore généralement l'efficience des soins et les résultats chez les patients, mais dans la littérature, les paramètres mesurés varient. Conclusion: Le développement de paramètres standardisés et de bases de données globales sur la CGU appuierait le contrôle de la qualité et l'amélioration du rendement des systèmes CGU.

Synoptic operative reporting: assessing the completeness, accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of synoptic reporting for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

OBJECTIVE: Synoptic reporting (SR) is one solution to improve the quality of operative reports. However, SR has not been investigated in bariatric surgery despite an identified need by bariatric surgeons. SR for RYGB was developed using quality indicators (QIs) established by a national Delphi process. The objective of this study is to assess the completeness, accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of synoptic versus narrative operative reports (NR) in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). METHODS: A NR and SR were completed on 104 consecutive RYGBs. Two evaluators independently compared the reports to QIs. Completeness and accuracy measures were determined. Reliability was calculated using Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LOA). Time to complete SR and NR was also compared. RESULTS: The mean completion rate of SR was 99.8% (±SD 0.98%) compared to 64.0% (±SD 6.15%) for NR (t = 57.9, p < 0.001). All subsections of SR were >99% complete. This was significantly higher than for NR (p < 0.001) except for small bowel division details (p = 0.530). Accuracy was significantly higher for SR than NR (94.2% ± SD 4.31% vs. 53.6% ± SD 9.82%, respectively, p < 0.001). Rater agreement was excellent for both SR (0.11, 95% LOA -0.53 to 0.75) and NR (-0.26, 95% LOA -4.85 to 4.33) (p = 0.242), where 0 denotes perfect agreement. SR completion times were significantly shorter than NR (3:55 min ± SD 1:26 min and 4:50 min ± SD 0:50 min, respectively, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: The RYGB SR is superior to NR for completeness and accuracy. This platform is also both reliable and efficient. This SR should be incorporated into clinical practice.

Electronic synoptic reporting: assessing the completeness of synoptic and narrative reports for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Operative reporting is the foundation of surgical communication. The quality indicators (QIs) contained in these reports can be used to document the performance of processes that affect patient care and may afford quality assurance with improvement in healthcare. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the degree to which the electronic synoptic report (SR) documents the operative QIs compared with narrative reports (NR) for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The time to report availability on patient chart was also identified as a secondary measure. SETTING: Academic center, public hospital, Canada. METHODS: A total of 40 prospectively collected RYGB synoptic reports and 40 case-matched historical NRs were compared against checklist QIs that were established by a national Delphi process. These checklist QIs are validated and have high interrater agreement at our institution. Time from dictation to report availability on patient chart was measured. RESULTS: SR had a mean completion of 99.7% (±standard deviation [SD] 1.3%) compared with 64.0% (±SD 6.3%) for NR (t = 36.0, P<.0001). All subsections of SR were>99% complete and significantly higher than NR (P<.001). The mean time from NR dictation to report availability was 4.14 days (SD±3.17, range 0-10 d). All SRs were in the operative area after the procedure and were available immediately. CONCLUSION: The RYGB synoptic report is superior to the narrative report for inclusion of accepted quality indicators and time to availability. Important elements, including process of care, demographic characteristics, and anatomic-related data, were often missing from the NR. SR is a promising method for improving documentation for RYGB.