Local tumour control and patient survival after ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for small choroidal melanoma.

AIM: To report local tumour control, metastasis and survival rates of patients with small choroidal melanoma (CM) after treatment with ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) plaque brachytherapy. METHODS: Retrospective case series of 353 consecutive eyes with small CM (thickness ≤2.5 mm and largest basal diameter ≤16 mm) treated with Ru-106 brachytherapy at the London Ocular Oncology Service, between October 2004 and May 2019. RESULTS: The final cohort included 310 eyes and tumour recurrence was observed in 52 (17%) eyes. Ocular retention rate was 96%. Metastatic disease and tumour-related death occurred in 18 (5.8%) and 12 (3.9%) patients, respectively. Metastases were diagnosed after a median of 54 (54±35; range 3.6-118) months from initial treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimates for tumour recurrence, melanoma-related metastases and survival were 17% (95% CI 13.3% to 22.9%), 4.8% (95% CI 2.6% to 8.5%) and 98% (95% CI 94.4% to 99.1%) at 5 years and 26% (95% CI 18.3% to 35.3%), 16% (95% CI 8.7% to 27.7%) and 92% (95% CI 84.5% to 95.7%) at 10 years, respectively. On multivariable analysis, factors predictive for tumour recurrence included juxtapapillary location, larger plaque and final tumour thickness, and for metastasis exudative retinal detachment. CONCLUSION: Small CMs treated with Ru-106 brachytherapy show recurrence and death rates of 17% and 2% at 5 years and 26% and 8% at 10 years. As small CMs have better prognosis than large tumours, early treatment is the key for better survival outcomes.

Subconjunctival Ocular Argyrosis following Treatment with Ruthenium 106 Brachytherapy for Choroidal Melanoma.

Introduction: Ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) brachytherapy is one of the commonest eye-sparing treatments for choroidal melanoma. These patients require long-term surveillance of the treated tumour remnant to ensure there is no local recurrence. New or progressive pigmented lesions in treated eyes are often regarded as suspicious - especially if there are concerns of extra-scleral extension. Case Presentations: We present two cases of posterior choroidal melanoma treated five and 10 years previously with Ru-106. Both cases developed subconjunctival dark/black lesions on the anterior surface of the eye in the quadrant of the conjunctival peritomy during Ru-106 treatment. Both had similar findings on histopathology: black, non-organic, particulate foreign material of varying confluence deposited on elastin and collagen fibres. Energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis confirmed the material contained silver. Discussion: The Ru-106 applicator consists of a radioactive core of Ru-106 encapsulated within pure silver as a radiation shield. During surgical insertion, stainless steel suture needles and forceps can occasionally scratch the applicator's silver eyelets and scatter microscopic particles of elemental silver into the operative field. These particles were likely deposited within the subconjunctival tissues of these patients during brachytherapy administration, leading to localised ocular argyrosis. Iatrogenic ocular argyrosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of new pigmented lesions in patients treated with Ru-106 brachytherapy. This study is the first to unequivocally identify the cause of some post-brachytherapy ocular surface pigmentation as caused by silver.

Long-term visual outcomes after ruthenium plaque brachytherapy for posterior choroidal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: To assess the long-term visual outcomes in patients with posteriorly located choroidal melanoma treated with ruthenium plaque brachytherapy between January 2013 and December 2015. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive patients treated with ruthenium plaque brachytherapy for post-equatorial choroidal melanoma with available Snellen visual acuity before and after treatment, and the development and treatment of radiation complications. RESULTS: There were 219 patients with posterior choroidal melanoma treated with ruthenium plaque brachytherapy. Median follow up was 56.5 months, range 12-81 months. Final visual acuity was ≥6/12 in 97 (44.3%) patients, 6/12 to 6/60 in 57 (26.0%), <6/60 in 55 (25.1%) and 10 (4.6%) eyes were enucleated. Radiation maculopathy was the most common radiation complication encountered, occurring in 53 (24.2%) patients. Of these, final visual acuity was 6/12 in 10 patients (18.9%), 6/12 to 6/60 in 26 (49.1%), <6/60 in 16 (30.2%) and 1 eye (1.9%) was enucleated. Twenty-five (47%) with radiation maculopathy were treated with intravitreal anti-angiogenic therapy, 27 (51%) were monitored and one (2%) was treated with scatter photocoagulation. Eyes treated with intravitreal anti-angiogenic therapy had better final vision than those observed or treated with retinal laser (chi-square, p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, close proximity to the optic nerve and fovea, and large or notched plaque type was associated with final vision worse than 6/12. CONCLUSION: Most patients treated with ruthenium plaque brachytherapy for posterior choroidal melanoma retain 6/60 vision, with almost half retaining 6/12 vision at long term follow up.

Ruthenium plaque radiotherapy in the current era of retinoblastoma treatment.

BACKGROUND: Two major treatment modalities for retinoblastoma, intraarterial chemotherapy (IAC) and intravitreal chemotherapy (IVitC), have superseded external beam radiotherapy for eye salvage. In this new setting our objectives were to evaluate the indications for plaque radiotherapy, complications, and recurrence rates. METHODS: Retrospective detailed review of patient's charts was performed for all subjects treated with plaque radiotherapy for retinoblastoma between January 2015 and December 2020. RESULTS: A total of 12 eyes of 12 patients were included. Mean age at plaque insertion was 45 months (median 29, range 17-150). The treatment dose was 40 Gy to the tumor apex. The indication for plaque radiotherapy was salvage therapy in 11 eyes (92%) and primary treatment in one eye (8%). At last follow-up from plaque insertion (mean 36 months, range 3-67), four (33%) patients had visual acuity better than 0.5 LogMAR and four (33%) had visual acuity worse than 1.0 LogMAR. Radiation-related complications were: one (8%) vitreous haemorrhage, two (16%) non-proliferative radiation retinopathy and one (8%) cataract. Recurrence was detected in four (33%) patients at a mean of 7.8 months (median 5, range 1-20) post-plaque. Globe salvage rate was 75%, as three eyes required enucleation, one to treat recurrence of the tumor treated with plaque and two to treat recurrence of other tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In the current era of retinoblastoma management, a role for plaque radiotherapy remains for salvage or primary treatment in eyes with localised active tumor, providing tumor control in 66%. Close observation is recommended to both detect recurrence and radiation-related complications.

Secondary Enucleations for Uveal Melanoma: A 7-Year Retrospective Analysis.

PURPOSE: To describe the indications for secondary enucleations in uveal melanoma and analyze associations and outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent secondary enucleation for uveal melanoma in the London Ocular Oncology Service, between 2008 and 2014, were retrieved from medical records analyzed. Cox regression model was performed to analyze associations with secondary enucleation and metastases and Kaplan-Meier estimates to assess the probability of metastatic spread and death. RESULTS: During the study period 515 enucleations were performed for uveal melanoma, 99 (19%) of which were secondary enucleations. Tumors were located at the ciliary body in 21 eyes (21%), juxtapapillary in 31 (31%), and choroid elsewhere in 47 (48%). Primary treatment included Ru(106) plaque radiotherapy, proton beam radiotherapy, and transpupillary thermotherapy in 85, 11, and 3 eyes, respectively. Indications for secondary enucleation were tumor recurrence in 60 (61%), neovascular glaucoma in 21 (21%), and tumor nonresponse in 18 eyes (18%). Twenty patients (20%) were diagnosed with metastasis and 12 out of 20 died of metastatic spread. On multivariate analysis, juxtapapillary tumor location was found to associate with tumor nonresponse (P = .004) and nonresponding patients with metastatic spread (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Indications for secondary enucleations for uveal melanoma were tumor recurrence, neovascular glaucoma, and tumor nonresponse. This review identified a possible high-risk group (nonresponse), which proved radioresistant to treatment. These tumors were more frequently found in the juxtapapillary location and were associated with metastatic spread.

The use of strontium-90 Beta radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for conjunctival melanoma.

Background/Aims. To report the safety and efficacy of strontium (Sr(90)) beta radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for conjunctival melanoma. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken from 1999 to 2007 of all patients who underwent Sr(90) beta radiotherapy for incompletely excised conjunctival melanoma. Failure of treatment was defined as recurrence of a conjunctival melanoma at the same location following beta radiotherapy. Results. Twenty patients underwent Sr(90) beta radiotherapy for incompletely excised conjunctival melanoma. Median follow-up interval was 59 months (8-152). All patients had conjunctival melanoma involving the bulbar conjunctiva. Underlying diagnoses included PAM with atypia in 60% (12 of 20), PAM without atypia in 15% (3 of 20), and de novo conjunctival melanoma in 25% (5 of 20). Following Sr(90) beta radiotherapy, in 90% (18 out of 20) local control was achieved and visual acuity was not affected in any patient. Three patients (15%) had dry eye symptoms, episcleritis, and descemetcoele, respectively. No cataract or secondary glaucoma was reported. Conclusions. Sr(90) treatment is a very effective adjuvant treatment after excisional biopsy and cryotherapy for conjunctival melanoma with a local success rate of 90%. The treatment is not associated with significant side effects and visual acuity is not affected.