Technical considerations for isolated limb perfusion: A consensus paper.

BACKGROUND: Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a well-established surgical procedure for the administration of high dose chemotherapy to a limb for the treatment of advanced extremity malignancy. Although the technique of ILP was first described over 60 years ago, ILP is utilised in relatively few specialist centres, co-located with tertiary or quaternary cancer centres. The combination of high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy and the cytokine tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), mandates leakage monitoring to prevent potentially serious systemic toxicity. Since the procedure is performed at relatively few specialist centres, an ILP working group was formed with the aim of producing technical consensus guidelines for the procedure to streamline practice and to provide guidance for new centres commencing the technique. METHODS: Between October 2021 and October 2023 a series of face to face online and hybrid meetings were held in which a modified Delphi process was used to develop a unified consensus document. After each meeting the document was modified and recirculated and then rediscussed at subsequent meeting until a greater than 90% consensus was achieved in all recommendations. RESULTS: The completed consensus document comprised 23 topics in which greater than 90% consensus was achieved, with 83% of recommendations having 100% consensus across all members of the working group. The consensus recommendations covered all areas of the surgical procedure including pre-operative assessment, drug dosing and administration, perfusion parameters, hyperthermia, leakage monitoring and theatre logistics, practical surgical strategies and also post-operative care, response evaluation and staff training. CONCLUSION: We present the first joint expert-based consensus statement with respect to the technical aspects of ILP that can serve as a reference point for both existing and new centres in providing ILP.

Long-term outcome after surgical resection of non-high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumours without adjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the most common intra-abdominal sarcoma. Risk classification systems, commonly the modified National Institutes of Health consensus criteria, identify tumour properties relating to patient outcomes. However, owing to limited long-term evidence, most guidelines recommend up to 10-year follow-up for all risk groups except very low-risk GIST. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre study included patients who had complete resection of primary, non-metastatic GIST from three Scandinavian sarcoma centres: Gothenburg (2004-2020), Stockholm (2000-2019), and Oslo (2000-2017). Medical records were reviewed for clinical details regarding diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, and recurrence-free and disease-specific survival evaluated. RESULTS: The total cohort consisted of 1213 patients with GIST. High-risk patients and those treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors were excluded. The remaining 649 patients were included in the present analysis: 118 with very low-, 381 with low-, and 150 with intermediate-risk GISTs. Five-year recurrence-free survival rates were 100, 98.5, and 100 per cent for the intermediate-, low-, and very low-risk groups respectively (P = 0.246). Disease-specific survival rates 10 years after surgery were 100, 98.4, and 100 per cent for the intermediate-, low-, and very low-risk groups respectively (P = 0.262). CONCLUSION: Patients with completely resected non-high-risk GISTs have an excellent long-term outcome, irrespective of risk group. Follow-up programmes to detect disease recurrences in these patients are probably not indicated.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) originate from the muscle layer of the gastrointestinal tract. They are divided into risk groups according to size, location, and how quickly they grow. Patients with GIST, regardless of risk group, have been followed with imaging for several years after their tumour has been successfully removed with an operation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether follow-up is necessary for patients in the lower-risk groups. Six hundred and forty-nine patients with GISTs from the lower-risk groups were followed for 5 years (median). Only 1.2 per cent of the patients experienced a recurrence of their cancer. It was concluded that patients with GIST in the lower-risk groups do not need follow-up with imaging after a successful operation.

When sitting down hurts. / Vondt for å sitte.

The image shows a unilocular cyst with a smooth and even inner wall, containing an abundance of spherical sebaceous and hair-like structures.

Cancer therapy with isolated limb perfusion. / Kreftbehandling med isolert ekstremitetsperfusjon.

For locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas and metastases from melanoma located in the extremities, mutilating surgery or amputation may be necessary to achieve local control. Isolated limb perfusion with high-dose chemotherapy may represent an alternative to amputation for this patient group.

Integrating Anatomical, Molecular and Clinical Risk Factors in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Stomach.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant imatinib for 3 years is recommended to patients with high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Risk stratification is inaccurate, and risk assessments are further complicated by the increased use of neoadjuvant treatment. Anatomical criteria for prognostication have not been investigated. METHODS: Clinical, molecular, and anatomical variables were retrospectively studied in a population-based cohort of 295 patients with gastric GIST resected between 2000 and 2018. Gastric subsite was divided into the upper, middle, and lower thirds. Growth pattern was classified as luminal, exophytic, or transmural based on imaging and surgical reports. RESULTS: Of 113 tumors in the upper third of the stomach, 103 (91.2%) were KIT mutated, 7 (6.2%) were PDGFRA mutated, and 104 (92.0%) harbored genotypes sensitive to imatinib. Transmural tumors were strongly associated with a high mitotic index. Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 71% for patients with transmural tumors versus 96% with luminal or exophytic tumors (hazard ratio [HR] 8.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.69-19.36; p < 0.001), and, in high-risk patients, 5-year RFS was 46% for patients with transmural tumors versus 83% with luminal or exophytic tumors (HR 4.47, 95% CI 1.71-11.66; p = 0.001). Among 134 patients with tumors > 5 cm, there were 29 recurrences. Only five patients with exophytic or luminal tumors had recurrent disease, of whom four had tumor rupture. Five-year RFS for patients with exophytic/luminal tumors >5 cm without rupture was 98%. CONCLUSIONS: In the upper third, over 90% of tumors were sensitive to imatinib. Patients with exophytic or luminal tumors without rupture, irrespective of size, had an excellent prognosis and may not benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (EORTC-62092: STRASS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Unlike for extremity sarcomas, the efficacy of radiotherapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma is not established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone on abdominal recurrence-free survival. METHODS: EORTC-62092 is an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study done in 31 research institutions, hospitals, and cancer centres in 13 countries in Europe and North America. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with histologically documented, localised, primary retroperitoneal sarcoma that was operable and suitable for radiotherapy, who had not been previously treated and had a WHO performance status and American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 2 or lower, were centrally randomly assigned (1:1), using an interactive web response system and a minimisation algorithm, to receive either surgery alone or preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery. Randomisation was stratified by hospital and performance status. Radiotherapy was delivered as 50·4 Gy (in 28 daily fractions of 1·8 Gy) in either 3D conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy, and the objective of surgery was a macroscopically complete resection of the tumour mass with en-bloc organ resection as necessary. The primary endpoint was abdominal recurrence-free survival, as assessed by the investigator, and was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all patients who started their allocated treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01344018. FINDINGS: Between Jan 18, 2012 and April 10, 2017, 266 patients were enrolled, of whom 133 were randomly assigned to each group. The median follow-up was 43·1 months (IQR 28·8-59·2). 128 (96%) patients from the surgery alone group had surgery, and 119 (89%) patients in the radiotherapy and surgery group had both radiotherapy and surgery. Median abdominal recurrence-free survival was 4·5 years (95% CI 3·9 to not estimable) in the radiotherapy plus surgery group and 5·0 years (3·4 to not estimable) in the surgery only group (hazard ratio 1·01, 95% CI 0·71-1·44; log rank p=0·95). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were lymphopenia (98 [77%] of 127 patients in the radiotherapy plus surgery group vs one [1%] of 128 patients in the surgery alone group), anaemia (15 [12%] vs ten [8%]), and hypoalbuminaemia (15 [12%] vs five [4%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 30 (24%) of 127 patients in the radiotherapy plus surgery group, and in 13 (10%) of 128 patients in the surgery alone group. One (1%) of 127 patients in the radiotherapy plus surgery group died due to treatment-related serious adverse events (gastropleural fistula), and no patients in the surgery alone group died due to treatment-related serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Preoperative radiotherapy should not be considered as standard of care treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma. FUNDING: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, and European Clinical Trials in Rare Sarcomas.

Multimodal kreftbehandling av gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is a subtype of sarcoma that may occur in any part of the gastrointestinal system, most frequently in the stomach and small intestine. The most common symptoms are bleeding and abdominal pain. In this clinical review, we summarise the progress made with this condition and discuss the recommended diagnostics and treatment of GIST.

Recurrence-Free Survival After Resection of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Classified According to a Strict Definition of Tumor Rupture: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: In gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), rupture is a high-risk feature and an indication for adjuvant treatment; however, the independent impact of rupture on prognosis is uncertain and the term is inconsistently defined. In the present study, a previously proposed definition of 'tumor rupture' was applied on a population-based cohort of gastric GISTs. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for non-metastatic gastric GISTs from 2000 to 2015 were identified in the regional sarcoma database of Oslo University Hospital. Tumor rupture included spillage or fracture, piecemeal resection, incisional biopsy, blood-tinged ascites, gastric perforation, and microscopic adjacent infiltration. Minor defects of tumor integrity were not considered rupture, i.e. core needle biopsy, peritoneal tumor penetration, superficial peritoneal rupture, and R1 resection. Risk was assessed according to the modified National Institutes of Health consensus criteria. RESULTS: Among 242 patients, tumor rupture occurred in 22 patients and minor defects of tumor integrity occurred in 81 patients. Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for patients with tumor rupture, minor defects of tumor integrity, and no defect was 37, 91, and 96%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the high-risk group, 5 year RFS for patients with rupture was 37%, versus 77% without rupture (hazard ratio 3.56, 95% confidence interval 1.57-8.08, p = 0.001). On multivariable analysis, tumor rupture and mitotic index were independently associated with recurrence. Of 13 patients who received adjuvant imatinib after tumor rupture, 11 relapsed. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor rupture according to the present definition was independently associated with recurrence. With tumor rupture, patients relapsed despite adjuvant treatment. Without rupture, prognosis was good, even in the high-risk group.

Prediction of long-term survival in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor: analysis of a large, single-institution cohort.

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients with metastatic GIST become long-term survivors, and a more precise prediction of outcome could improve clinical decision-making. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One-hundred and thirty-three patients diagnosed with metastatic GIST from 1995 to 2013 were identified from the sarcoma database at Oslo University Hospital. Clinical data prospectively registered in the database were supplemented with retrospective review of medical records. Factors associated with survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifteen patients with metastatic GIST were included in the final study cohort. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.9 years (95% CI 5.6-8.3). Factors associated with long-term survival in univariate analysis were good baseline performance status (ECOG ≤1; p < .001), young age (p = .022), oligometastatic disease (OMD) (≤3 metastases; p < .001), maximum tumor diameter <5 cm (p < .001), surgery for metastatic disease (p = .005), surgery of the primary tumor (p < .001), normal baseline hemoglobin level (p = .05), normal baseline albumin level (p = .001) and normal baseline neutrophil count (p = .03). On multivariate analysis, good performance status, small tumor diameter and, OMD were the factors associated with long-term survival. Five and 10-year OS for patients with OMD were 89% and 71%, respectively, compared to 38% and 20% for patients with polymetastatic disease (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this single-institution cohort of patients, OMD was as a strong prognostic factor in patients with metastatic GIST. Patients with OMD had an outcome similar to patients with high-risk localized disease, and should be regarded as a separate category among patients with metastatic GIST.