Use of modern three-dimensional imaging models to guide surgical planning for local control of pediatric extracranial solid tumors.

INTRODUCTION: In complex pediatric surgical oncology, surgical planning is contingent upon data gathered from preoperative imaging. Three-dimensional (3D) modeling and printing has been shown to be beneficial for adult presurgical planning, though pediatric literature is less robust. The study reviews our institutional experience with the use of 3D image segmentation and printed models in approaching resection of extracranial solid tumors in children. METHODS: This is a single institutional series from 2021 to 2023. Models were based on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies, optimized for 3D imaging. The feasibility and creation of the models is reviewed, including specific techniques, software, and printing materials from our institution. Clinical implications for surgical planning are also described, along with detailed preoperative and intraoperative images. RESULTS: 3D modeling and printing was performed for four pediatric patients diagnosed with extracranial solid tumors. Diagnoses included Ewing sarcoma, hepatoblastoma, synovial sarcoma, and osteosarcoma. No intraoperative complications or discrepancies with the preoperative 3D-printed model were noted. No evidence of local recurrence was identified in any patient thus far. CONCLUSION: Our institutional series demonstrates a wide spectrum of clinical application for 3D modeling and printing technology within pediatric surgical oncology. This technology may aid in surgical planning for both resection and reconstruction, can be applied to a diverse breadth of diagnoses, and may potentially augment patient and/or family education about their condition.

Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Appendix in Children and Adolescents: A Clinicopathologic Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pediatric neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the GI tract are rare and appendiceal NET are typically incidental. Few studies have been done in the pediatric population and practice guidelines are mainly based on adult data. There are currently no diagnostic studies specific for NET. Our study aimed to identify clinical, radiological, and pathological findings in pediatric appendiceal NET, test criteria for follow up surgical treatment, review potential prognostic pathological findings, and possible pre-operative diagnostic radiological studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective data search was conducted for well-differentiated NET of the appendix in patients ≤21 years between 1/1/2003 and 7/1/2022. Available clinical, radiologic, pathological, and follow-up information was recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with appendiceal NET were identified. No masses were reported in the patients who underwent presurgical imaging. Appendectomy samples showed NET (0.2->4 cm), most located in the tip. Most cases were WHO G1 (34/37), with negative margins (n = 25). Sixteen cases extended to the subserosa/mesoappendix (pT3). Lymphovascular (6), perineural (2), and both lymphovascular and perineural invasion were also noted (2). The specified tumor stages were pT1 (10/37), pT3 (16/37), and pT4 (4/37). Patients who underwent laboratory testing for chromogranin A (20) and urine 5HIAA (11) had normal limits. Subsequent surgical resection was recommended in 13 cases and performed in 11. To date, all patients have no recurrent or additional metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that all pediatric well-differentiated appendiceal NET were incidentally found as part of acute appendicitis management. Most NET were localized with low-grade histology. Our small cohort support the previously suggested management guidelines with follow up resection in certain cases. Our radiologic review didn't identify a best modality for NET. Comparing cases with and without metastatic disease, no tumors under 1 cm had metastasis, but serosal and perineural invasion along with G2 status were associated with metastasis in our limited study.

Review at a multidisciplinary tumor board impacts critical management decisions of pediatric patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Optimal cancer care requires a multidisciplinary approach. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary tumor board on the treatment plans of children with solid tumors. PROCEDURES: The records of 158 consecutive patients discussed at a formal multidisciplinary pediatric tumor board between July 2012 and April 2014 were reviewed. Treatment plans were based on clinical practice guidelines and on current Children's Oncology Group protocols. Alterations in radiologic, pathologic, surgical, and medical interpretations were analyzed to determine the impact on changes in recommendations for clinical management. RESULTS: Overall, 55 of 158 children (35%) had alterations in radiologic, pathologic, medical, or surgical interpretation of clinical data following multidisciplinary discussion. Of these, 64% had changes to the initial recommendation for clinical management. Review of imaging studies resulted in interpretation changes in 30 of 158 patients studied (19%), with 12 clinical management changes. Six of 158 patients (3.9%) had changes in pathologic interpretation, with four patients (2.5%) requiring treatment changes. In eight patients (5%), a change in medical management was recommended, while in 11 patients (7%) there were changes in surgical management that were based solely on discussion and not on interpretation of imaging or pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Formal multidisciplinary review led to alterations in interpretation of clinical data in 35% of patients, and the majority led to changes in recommendations for treatment. Comprehensive multidisciplinary tumor board incorporated into the care of children with cancer provides additional perspectives for families and care providers when delineating optimal treatment plans.