First Report of Leveillula taurica Causing Powdery Mildew on Pepper in Maryland.

Pepper plants in large experimental plots in Beltsville, MD developed widespread powdery mildew during the late summer of 2008. Infection was observed in a diversity of accessions that included Capsicum annuum, C. baccatum, C. chinense, and C. frutescens (2). The C. annuum accessions included culinary bell pepper cultivars and breeding lines as well as a diverse collection of ornamental breeding lines, heirlooms, and land races. Significant leaf damage occurred and led to partial defoliation. Extensive coverage of the abaxial surface by white patches of conidia was noted, along with chlorotic regions on the adaxial surface. Conidia were borne singly and were apically tapered, measuring 65.2 ± 3.2 × 14.9 ± 1.9 µm. Cleistothecia were not found on infected leaves (3). PCR amplification of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region using ITS1-2 primers yielded a band that was cloned and sequenced (4). The pathogen was identified as Leveillula taurica based on 100% homology to GenBank Accession No. AY912077. Multiple chili pepper and bell pepper plants were inoculated with conidia from an infected bell pepper plant by placement in an enclosed spore deposition chamber for 1 week, with the infected plant suspended over the test plants. Signs of powdery mildew appeared only on inoculated plants. DNA samples from these inoculated plants were analyzed and verified as L. taurica (a sequence was deposited as GenBank No. GQ167201). A second set of inoculations using the newly infected plants confirmed results of the first test, with mildew developing only on inoculated pepper plants. This disease is new to the mid-Atlantic Region of the United States. It has been reported in greenhouse peppers growing in Ontario, Canada where it has become a recurring problem requiring fungicide intervention (1). Given the wide host range of L. taurica and the systemic nature of infections, it is likely that the fungus has become established in Maryland on perennial host plants. References: (1) R. Cerkauskas. Plant Dis. 83:781, 1999. (2) V. de Souza. Plant Pathol. 52:613, 2003. (3) C. Little. Plant Dis. 90:1358, 2006. (4) G. Saenz. Can. J. Bot. 77:150, 1999.

Improved phytonutrient content through plant genetic improvement.

During the twentieth century, plant breeding and genetics improved the nutritive value of horticultural and agronomic crops, particularly of macronutrients and fiber. Current research focuses more on micronutrients. Successful development of phytonutrient-enriched crop plants will be bolstered by interdisciplinary collaborative research, analytical and biotechnology advances, and public education. Although the melding of plant and nutrition research holds great promise, the genetic enhancement of crop plants for improved phytonutrient content will be challenging. This paper reviews the knowledge base on which genetic enhancement may be based, identifies gaps in scientific knowledge and technical capacities, and suggests a role for the federal government in research.

Enzymic Components of Sucrose Accumulation in the Wild Tomato Species Lycopersicon peruvianum.

Sugar and soluble solids content and invertase (EC 3.2.1.26), sucrose synthase (EC 2.4.1.13), and sucrose phosphate synthase (EC 2.4.1.14) enzyme activities were measured throughout fruit development in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and the green fruited species Lycopersicon peruvianum. Fruit of L. peruvianum accumulated predominantly sucrose, in contrast with hexose accumulation, which is characteristic of L. esculentum. The percentage of soluble solids in ripe L. peruvianum fruit was more than twice that present in L. esculentum and attributed primarily to the high level of sucrose accumulated in L. peruvianum. Low levels of invertase and sucrose synthase activity were associated with the period of significant sucrose accumulation and storage in L. peruvianum. Increased sucrose phosphate synthase activity was observed during the latter stages of fruit development in sucrose-accumulating fruit but was not coincident with maximum rates of sucrose accumulation.