Building on a novel bootstrapping modelling technique to predict region-wide critical care capacity requirements over the next decade.

We have previously described an open-source data-driven modelling technique that has been used to model critical care resource provision as well as expanded to elective surgery and even whole-hospital modelling. Here, we describe the use of this technique to model patient flow and resource use across the West Yorkshire Critical Care Network, with the advantage that recommendations can be made at an individual unit level for future resource provision, taking into account changes in population numbers and demography over the coming decade. We will be using this approach in other regions around the UK to help predict future critical care capacity requirements.

Does 'fast - track' axillary node clearance following positive core biopsy lead to overtreatment of axilla?

AIMS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the preferred axillary staging procedure, although axillary node clearance (ANC) is still indicated in subgroups of patients. This study aims to review our practice of axillary treatment in node positive cancer, to determine the proportion of patients requiring ANC and to identify if this can be avoided in some patients. METHODS: Retrospective data for all breast cancer patients who underwent surgery between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 were included in this study. The histopathology results of ANC were correlated with axillary ultrasound findings, axillary biopsy or SLNB results and effect of neoadjuvant treatment. These were analysed against the available guidelines to evaluate the current practice. RESULTS: 82 patients out of 520 had ANC (15.7%). Four groups were identified: Group A included 45 patients with nodal infiltration on preoperative biopsy; Group B included 24 patients with nodal infiltration who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT); Group C included 11 patients with involved nodes on SLNB; Group D included 2 patients with axillary recurrence. 35.5% of patients in Group A had only 1-2 positive nodes following ANC. Complete pathological response was observed in 37.5% patients following NACT. No further nodes were subsequently found in a majority of patients who underwent ANC following positive SLNB (63.6%). CONCLUSIONS: 15.7% of breast cancer patients required ANC. Few patients now require ANC following positive SLNB. The practice of direct (fast-track) ANC after axillary biopsy may lead to overtreatment of the axilla, which needs re-evaluation. Targeted axillary dissection could avoid unnecessary axillary dissection in patients with abnormal nodes and in patients who have received NACT.

Tension pneumothorax due to perforated colon.

A very rare case of traumatic diaphragmatic hernia is reported in a 65-year-old woman who presented 46 years after her initial thoracoabdominal injury with tension faecopneumothorax caused by a perforated colon in the chest cavity. She presented in a critical condition with severe respiratory distress, sepsis and acute kidney injury. She had a long-standing history of bronchial asthma with respiratory complications and had experienced progressive shortness of breath for the past year. A recent CT scan had excluded the presence of a diaphragmatic hernia but showed a significantly raised left hemidiaphragm. On admission, chest X-rays showed a significantly raised left hemidiaphragm and mediastinal shift, but the possibility of a diaphragmatic hernia with strangulated bowel in the chest was not suspected until the patient was reviewed by the surgical and intensive care unit consultants the next morning and a repeat CT performed. She had a successful outcome after her emergency operation.

Angiogenin outperforms VEGF, EPCs and CECs in predicting Dukes' and AJCC stage in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Circulating endothelial cells (CECs), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), Willebrand factor (vWf), soluble E-selectin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiogenin are of interest in cancer vascular biology. However, few studies have looked at more than one in combination. We set out to determine which would be best in predicting the Dukes' and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) scores in colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: We recruited 154 patients with colorectal cancer, 29 healthy controls and 26 patients with benign bowel disease. CD34(+) /CD45(-) /CD146(+) CECs and CD34(+) /CD45(-) /CD309[KDR](+) EPCs were measured by flow cytometry, plasma markers by ELISA. RESULTS: All research indices were raised in colorectal cancer (P < 0·05) compared to control groups. Although CECs (P < 0·05), EPCs (P < 0·01) and angiogenin (P < 0·01) increased stepwise across the four Dukes' stages and four AJCC stages, only angiogenin remained significant in multiple regression analysis (P = 0·003 for Dukes, P = 0·01 for AJCC). Angiogenin levels were higher in Dukes' stages C and D compared to stage A, and AJCC stages 4-6 and 7-10 compared to stage 1 (all P < 0·05). Adding a second research marker to angiogenin did not markedly improve this relationship. CONCLUSION: Although we found disturbances in endotheliod cells and plasma markers of the endothelium and growth factors, only angiogenin levels were independently associated with progression of the Dukes' stage and AJCC stage, with the association with Duke's stage being stronger. We suggest that angiogenin is a potential biomarker in risk stratification for colorectal cancer, and may aid clinical decision making.

The endotheliome: a new concept in vascular biology.

As the importance of the endothelium is becoming increasingly recognised, additional tools are needed to assess its functions. Separate studies have looked at different aspects of vascular biology primarily focusing on the central role of the endothelium, i.e. secretion/release of molecules in the plasma, physiological action on other cells, and the presence of endothelial cells themselves in the circulation. Targeting and protecting the endothelium is a promising therapeutic strategy for modifying a number of disease processes but 'ideal' methods to monitor this treatment, like many other tools for assessing endothelial activity, remain elusive. We suggest that a broader view of the endothelium is important, and with it the concept of the assessment of overall vascular function, which fuses different aspects of endothelial activity into a unifying concept. In the present document we review the current understanding of endothelial biology and the methods of its assessment, and hypothesise that a more multifactorial approach to the endothelium will be a crucial determinant of outcomes and treatment strategies for different diseases. This we describe as the 'endotheliome'.

Raman spectroscopy--a new method for the intra-operative assessment of axillary lymph nodes.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy has become the standard surgical procedure for the sampling of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. Intra operative node assessment is currently not offered to the majority of patients but would allow definitive axillary surgery to take place immediately. This would confer benefits both to the patient and to the healthcare system. Our experimental study aims to demonstrate that a Raman spectroscopy probe device could overcome many of the disadvantages of current intra-operative analysis techniques. 38 axillary lymph nodes, 25 negative and 13 positive from 20 patients undergoing breast surgery for invasive breast cancer were assessed using a commercially available Raman spectroscopy probe. Spectra were assessed using principal component fed linear discriminant analysis trained by the histopathology results. Leave one node out cross validation achieved a sensitivity of up to 92% and a specificity of up to 100% in differentiating between normal and metastatic lymph nodes.

Use of multiple drains after mastectomy is associated with more patient discomfort and longer postoperative stay.

BACKGROUND: Seromas constitute a common complication following surgery for breast cancer, and closed drainage is used routinely to reduce its incidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of number of drains on patient discomfort, seroma formation, and hospital stay during the immediate postoperative period after mastectomy for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on a retrospective review of our clinical database, 110 consecutive patients from January 2004 through January 2006 who had undergone a mastectomy and axillary clearance for breast cancer were sent a simple postal questionnaire for collection of data. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients responded (all women; mean age, 69.4 +/- 11.4 years). Twenty-seven patients (38.57%) had 3 drains implanted unilaterally, 24 (34.28%) had 2, and 19 (27.14%) had 1 drain. They were divided into 2 groups: the first group with 1 drain (19 patients) and the other with 2 or 3 drains (51 patients). Median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days (range, 1-8 days); patients with 1 drain had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (median, 2 days [range, 1-4 days] vs. 2 days [range, 1-8 days]; Mann-Whitney U test, P = .02). A total of 15 patients (21.43%) complained of a seroma. There was no difference in seroma rates between groups. Patients who had a single drain implanted had a significantly lower rate of discomfort (median, 2 [range, 1-5] vs. 3 [range, 1-7]; Mann-Whitney U test; P = .04). CONCLUSION: The number of drains used after a mastectomy for breast cancer did not significantly affect the rate or amount of seromas in this study, but the use of a single drain after mastectomy was significantly associated with less discomfort and shorter postoperative hospital stay.

Circulating endothelial cells and circulating progenitor cells in breast cancer: relationship to endothelial damage/dysfunction/apoptosis, clinicopathologic factors, and the Nottingham Prognostic Index.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Abnormal circulating endothelial cell (CEC) and circulating progenitor cell (CPC) numbers are present in cancer, but their relationship with angiogenesis, apoptosis, vascular biology, and prognosis is unclear. We prospectively studied 160 patients with breast cancer and 63 age-matched controls free of breast cancer, measuring CECs (CD45(-)/CD146(+)/CD34(+)) and CPCs (CD45(-)/CD133(+)/CD34(+)) by flow cytometry and plasma markers of endothelial damage/dysfunction (von Willebrand factor), apoptosis (Fas/Fas-L) and angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], angiogenin) by ELISA. These were compared with clinicopathophysiologic features and the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI). An additional blood sample was taken 6 to 8 weeks after surgery from 15 women to test the effect of tumor removal. RESULTS: CECs were significantly higher in the NPI poor prognostic group compared with moderate and good prognostic groups, and the cancer-free controls, whereas CPCs were lower in the poor prognosis group (both P < .05). Levels of von Willebrand factor, VEGF, angiogenin, and Fas-L (but not soluble Fas) were abnormal in breast cancer compared with controls (P < .05), with no relationship to prognosis groups. VEGF (P = .04) and angiogenin (P = .001) were markedly different after surgery. In multivariate analysis, vascular invasion (P < .05) and tumor size (P < .001) were independently associated with CECs. CPCs did not significantly associate with NPI in a linear regression model; age (P < .05) was a negative predictor, whereas Her-2 status (P < .05) positively predicted CPCs. After adjustment, no variable independently predicted CPC levels. CONCLUSIONS: CECs and CPCs demonstrate a strong relationship with NPI groups, but only CECs positively predict higher NPI scores and correlate with tumor invasiveness and size, possibly reflecting total tumor vascular volume.

SELDI-TOF-MS determination of hepcidin in clinical samples using stable isotope labelled hepcidin as an internal standard.

BACKGROUND: Hepcidin is a 25-residue peptide hormone crucial to iron homeostasis. It is essential to measure the concentration of hepcidin in cells, tissues and body fluids to understand its mechanisms and roles in physiology and pathophysiology. With a mass of 2791 Da hepcidin is readily detectable by mass spectrometry and LC-ESI, MALDI and SELDI have been used to estimate systemic hepcidin concentrations by analysing serum or urine. However, peak heights in mass spectra may not always reflect concentrations in samples due to competition during binding steps and variations in ionisation efficiency. Thus the purpose of this study was to develop a robust assay for measuring hepcidin using a stable isotope labelled hepcidin spiking approach in conjunction with SELDI-TOF-MS. RESULTS: We synthesised and re-folded hepcidin labelled with 13C/15N phenylalanine at position 9 to generate an internal standard for mass spectrometry experiments. This labelled hepcidin is 10 Daltons heavier than the endogenous peptides and does not overlap with the isotopic envelope of the endogenous hepcidin or other common peaks in human serum or urine mass spectra and can be distinguished in low resolution mass spectrometers. We report the validation of adding labelled hepcidin into serum followed by SELDI analysis to generate an improved assay for hepcidin. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that without utilising a spiking approach the hepcidin peak height in SELDI spectra gives a good indication of hepcidin concentration. However, a stable isotope labelled hepcidin spiking approach provides a more robust assay, measures the absolute concentration of hepcidin and should facilitate inter-laboratory hepcidin comparisons.

A comparison of plasma versus histologic indices of angiogenic markers in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Over-expression of angiogenic growth factors and their receptors, and high levels of these molecules in the blood, are a common feature of cancer although the relationships between cell expression and plasma levels are unknown. We hypothesized a significant correlation between the expression and cellular distribution of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), its receptor Flt-1, and the angiopoietin receptor Tie-2 with levels of these molecules in the plasma. METHODS: The tissue expression of VEGF, Flt-1, and Tie-2 were investigated by immunohistochemistry, and plasma levels assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 36 patients with breast cancer and 15 with benign breast disease. RESULTS: Despite expected significant differences in plasma levels of the molecules (P<0.03 to <0.001), no significant differences were found in Tie-2, VEGF, and Flt-1 tissue expression between breast cancer and benign disease controls. No significant correlations were observed between plasma levels of their tissue expression. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue expression of Tie-2, VEGF, and Flt-1 may not be an overly sensitive tool for assessing abnormalities of coagulation, platelet activation, and angiogenesis in human cancer. Plasma markers may not be representative of tumor activity, and may not come wholly from tumor cells. Instead these markers may be indicative of endothelial dysfunction in cancer patients.

Hypertension, anti-hypertensive therapy and neoplasia.

The link between cancer, hypertension and anti-hypertensive drug treatment is controversial. Despite numerous studies looking either directly or indirectly at cancer and hypertension, the results are often conflicting and do little to answer the dominant questions of cause and effect. Also, the treatment of hypertension has continued to evolve, with newer therapies being made available including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Whilst the potential link with cancer is thought to be small at worst, with the overall benefits of hypertension far outweighing its negative impacts, the suggestion of a carcinogenic role for either hypertension or its treatment continues to be an emotive issue, and needs firm answers. In this review, we provide an overview establishing the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments presented and highlight possible pharmacophysiological pathways involved.

Changes in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor, angiopoietins, and their receptors following surgery for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a major angiogenic growth factor, is involved in the pathogenesis of cancer. Plasma VEGF is raised in breast cancer and falls after successful surgery. Less is known about angiopoietins 1 and 2 (Ang-1, Ang-2). All three growth factors act on cells via receptors; Flt-1 for VEGF and Tie-2 for the angiopoietins. Cancer is also marked by abnormalities in platelet activation (marked by soluble P selectin) and inflammation (interleukin-6 [IL6]). We hypothesised altered plasma Ang-1, Ang-2, Flt-1 and Tie-2 in breast cancer that would normalize after 3 and 12 months treatment (i.e., surgery plus chemo/radiotherapy). METHODS: Baseline venous blood was obtained from 40 women with breast cancer and 30 age-matched women with benign breast disease (BBD) also requiring surgery. Samples were taken again 3 months and 1 year later. Soluble P selectin, IL6, VEGF, Ang-1, Ang-2, Flt-1 and Tie-2 were measured in citrated plasma by ELISA. RESULTS: Women with breast cancer had raised VEGF (7-fold), Ang-1 (50% higher) and Tie-2 (2-fold), but lower Flt-1 (to 26%), compared to the BBD women that broadly correlated with markers of platelet activation and inflammation. A level of Tie-2 or VEGF >95th percentile of the BBD group correctly identified 68% and 52% of the women with breast cancer. After 3 months of treatment, VEGF and Ang-1 normalized (as did IL6 and soluble P selectin) but Tie-2 was significantly lower only after 1 year. There were no significant changes in the women with BBD. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment for breast cancer (surgery followed by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy) is effective in reducing plasma VEGF, Tie-2 and Ang-1. These may be linked pathogenically with coagulation and inflammation.

Detection and quantification of mature circulating endothelial cells using flow cytometry and immunomagnetic beads: a methodological comparison.

Mature circulating endothelial cells (CECs) are novel cellular markers of endothelial damage/dysfunction. The two main techniques of CEC enumeration are flow cytometry (FC) and immunomagnetic bead (IB) isolation. Both quantify CECs accurately, but a direct comparison of both methods has not been reported. We sought to assess the agreement between the two methods in two patient populations, and a group of healthy subjects, with emphasis given to methodological issues. We included 34 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 60 patients with primary breast cancer (PBC) and 30 healthy controls (HC). We quantified CECs using the IB method [CD146 and FITCUlex europaeus lectin-1] and FC [CD45, CD34 and CD146]. Bland-Altman plots suggested reasonable agreement (<5% of events >2 standard deviations from the mean) between FC and the IB methods for CEC quantification in whole blood in the two disease groups (ACS and PBC), but not among the HCs. There were no statistically significant differences in CEC levels by the two methods amongst all three patient groups. There is reasonable agreement between the FC and the IB methods for mature CEC quantification in whole blood, especially amongst disease groups. The agreement between the two methods appears to weaken in healthy controls, and at lower and higher absolute CEC counts.

Circulating endothelial cells in malignant disease.

Cancer is a disease largely dependent on neoangiogenesis. Cancer neoangiogenesis is often disordered and abnormal, with evidence of coexisting vascular endothelial dysfunction. A novel method of assessing vascular endothelial function in cancer is via the quantification of circulating endothelial cells (CEC). Unusual in healthy individuals, their presence in elevated numbers often indicates substantial vascular endothelial perturbation. Another interesting cell type is the endothelial progenitor cell (EPC), whose numbers increase in the presence of vascular damage. Recent research suggests that EPCs have an important role in tumor vasculogenesis. Another marker being investigated in the context of vascular dysfunction and coagulopathy is the endothelial microparticle (EMP). Thus, CECs, EPCs and EMPs may represent potentially novel methods for evaluating the vascular status of cancer patients. This review will summarize the current position of CECs, EPCs and EMPs in cell biology terms, with particular emphasis on their relationship to malignant disease.

Platelet adhesion in breast cancer: development and application of a novel assay.

The increased risk of thromboembolism in cancer may be related to a prothrombotic or hypercoagulable state, with abnormalities of haemostasis and platelet activation. To further investigate the role of platelets in this disease, we developed and applied a new assay to detect and quantify platelet adhesion to the well-defined subendothelial substrate, fibrinogen. Platelet-rich plasma was obtained from 31 females with breast cancer (13 metastatic, 18 benign), and 30 healthy female controls, re-suspended to 2 x 10(8) cells/ml and 100 microl and incubated for 1 h in microtitre plates pre-coated with fibrinogen (5 mg/ml). The supernatant was carefully aspirated, lysed with Triton X-100 and stored at -70 degrees C as supernatant-platelet lysate. The microtitre wells were carefully washed with saline, bound platelets lysed with Triton, and the lysate stored at -70 degrees C as bound-platelet lysate. P-selectin was determined in supernatant-platelet lysate and bound-platelet lysate for each patient by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Interpreting differences in P-selectin in different lysates as reflective of adhesion, patients with cancer had increased platelet adhesion (absolute and percentage, both P < 0.001) compared with healthy controls. There was also more adhesion (P < 0.001) in metastatic disease compared with non-metastatic disease. Patients with breast carcinomas, and, in particular, those with metastatic disease, have a higher degree of platelet adhesion, which may by quantified by a novel method based on cell lysis. This increase in platelet adhesiveness may be related to an increased risk of thromboembolism in these patients.

Platelet activation, coagulation and angiogenesis in breast and prostate carcinoma.

In health, haemostasis and angiogenesis are tightly regulated processes, but may become deregulated in cancer. Recent evidence suggests that platelet activation may link these processes as platelets can release angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Furthermore, inflammation has also been implicated in regulating both coagulation and angiogenesis, possibly by activating platelets directly and increasing, for example, plasma fibrinogen. We hypothesized relationships between plasma markers of the processes in two common forms of cancer. Plasma levels of VEGF (reflecting angiogenesis), soluble P-selectin, (marking platelet activation), tissue factor [TF], fibrinogen and fibrin D-dimer (coagulation markers), and serum levels of IL-6 (inflammation) were measured by ELISA in 30 patients with biopsy-proven breast cancer, 30 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer, and 30 age- and sex-matched controls for each group. Prostate specific antigen was also measured in the men. Release of VEGF from IL-6 stimulated platelets was assessed by ELISA. Plasma levels of IL-6 (P <0.02), VEGF, soluble P-selectin, fibrinogen, and fibrin D-dimer (all p <0.01) were significantly raised in breast cancer, whereas VEGF, soluble P-selectin, fibrin D-dimer (all p <0.01) and fibrinogen (p <0.05) were significantly raised in prostate cancer. Significant correlations were found between IL-6 and VEGF (p <0.01), and IL-6 and soluble P-selectin (p = 0.038) in breast cancer. Further experiments demonstrated an in vitro IL-6 induced dose-dependent release of VEGF from platelets. In conclusion, strong relationships between IL6 and VEGF, but not with coagulation or platelet markers, and release of VEGF from IL-6 stimulated platelets, suggest a role for inflammation and platelets in angiogenesis.

Coagulopathic complications in breast cancer.

Patients with cancer are highly susceptible to thromboembolic complications, which account for a significant percentage of the morbidity and mortality of the disease. Up to 15% of patients with clinically overt cancer present with venous thromboembolism during the course of their disease. Moreover, patients with cancer represent 20% of all patients in whom deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are diagnosed. This prothrombotic state in cancer can occur due to the ability of tumor cells to directly activate the blood-clotting cascade and cause thrombosis or induce procoagulant properties and inhibit anticoagulant properties of vascular endothelial cells, platelets, monocytes, and macrophages. It also is well established that this prothrombotic tendency in patients with cancer can be enhanced greatly by anticancer treatments, such as surgery and chemotherapy. This phenomenon can be seen in patients with breast cancer, particularly after surgery and chemotherapy. Increased clotting risk also is associated with the use of central venous access devices, commonly used to administer chemotherapeutic agents in patients with cancer. Thrombosis prophylaxis, therefore, should be considered for patients with breast cancer who are at risk before and during intervention. In the current review, the authors discuss the problem of thromboembolism in patients with breast cancer who are undergoing therapy, the mechanisms by which thromboembolisms occur, and the potential strategies by which these events may be prevented. Better understanding of these pathogenetic pathways may lead to the development of more targeted strategies to prevent thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

The hypercoagulable state of malignancy: pathogenesis and current debate.

A hypercoagulable or prothrombotic state of malignancy occurs due to the ability of tumor cells to activate the coagulation system. It has been estimated that hypercoagulation accounts for a significant percentage of mortality and morbidity in cancer patients. Prothrombotic factors in cancer include the ability of tumor cells to produce and secrete procoagulant/fibrinolytic substances and inflammatory cytokines, and the physical interaction between tumor cell and blood (monocytes, platelets, neutrophils) or vascular cells. Other mechanisms of thrombus promotion in malignancy include nonspecific factors such as the generation of acute phase reactants and necrosis (i.e., inflammation), abnormal protein metabolism (i.e., paraproteinemia), and hemodynamic compromise (i.e., stasis). In addition, anticancer therapy (i.e., surgery/chemotherapy/hormone therapy) may significantly increase the risk of thromboembolic events by similar mechanisms, e.g., procoagulant release, endothelial damage, or stimulation of tissue factor production by host cells. However, not all of the mechanisms for the production of a hypercoagulable state of cancer are entirely understood. In this review, we attempt to describe what is currently accepted about the pathophysiology of the hypercoagulable state of cancer. We also discuss whether or not to screen patients with idiopathic deep venous thrombosis for an underlying malignancy, and whether this would be beneficial to patients. It is hoped that a better understanding of these mechanisms will ultimately lead to the development of more targeted treatment to prevent thromboembolic complications in cancer patients. It is also hoped that antithrombotic strategies may also have a positive effect on the process of tumor growth and dissemination.