Cisplatin, fluorouracil, celecoxib, and RT in resectable esophageal cancer: preliminary results.

Esophageal cancer frequently expresses cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme. In preclinical studies, COX-2 inhibition results in decreased cell proliferation and potentiation of chemotherapy and radiation. We report preliminary results of a phase II study conducted by the Hoosier Oncology Group in patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer. All patients received cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 29 and fluorouracil (5-FU) at 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4 and 29 to 32 with radiation (50.4 Gy beginning on day 1). Celecoxib (Celebrex) was administered at 200 mg orally twice daily beginning on day 1 until surgery and then at 400 mg orally twice daily until disease progression or unexpected toxicities, or for a maximum of 5 years. Esophagectomy was performed 4 to 6 weeks after completion of chemoradiation. The primary study endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints included response rate, toxicity, overall survival, and correlation between COX-2 expression and pCR. Thirty-one patients were enrolled from March 2001 to July 2002. Respective grade 3/4 toxicities were experienced by 58%/19% of patients, and consisted of granulocytopenia (16%), nausea/vomiting (16%), esophagitis (10%), dehydration (10%), stomatitis (6%), and diarrhea (31%). Seven patients (24%) required initiation of enteral feedings. There have been seven deaths so far, resulting from postoperative complications (2), pulmonary embolism (1), pneumonia (1), and progressive disease (3). Of the 22 patients (71%) who underwent surgery, 5 had pCR (22%). We conclude that the addition of celecoxib to chemoradiation is well tolerated. The pCR rate of 22% in this study is similar to that reported with the use of preoperative chemoradiation in other trials. Further follow-up is necessary to assess the impact of maintenance therapy with celecoxib on overall survival.

Phase II study of low-dose topotecan in myelodysplastic syndromes: a Hoosier Oncology Group (HOG) study.

Topotecan has demonstrable activity in high-risk MDS and CMMoL. However, the significant toxicity of topotecan administered at a dose of 2mg/m2 i.v. daily for 5 days as a continuous infusion limits its use in older patients. Therefore, we studied topotecan 1.5mg/m2 per day i.v. over 2 h for three consecutive days in 20 patients with high-risk MDS (12 RAEB; 4 RAEB-T; 4 CMMoL). Cycles were given every 4-6 weeks. Fifteen patients were evaluable for response. Only one patient achieved a durable complete remission (CR). There were three deaths within the first cycle of therapy. Severe myelosuppression was the most common toxicity. Grades 3-4 infections were documented in four patients. We conclude that topotecan administered at this dose and schedule has no clinically significant activity.

Phase II study of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the response rate, duration of response and survival with weekly gemcitabine plus docetaxel in metastatic or unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Forty patients were enrolled, and 38 patients were evaluable for survival and toxicity. Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for response. Nine patients (24%) had locally advanced disease and 29 (76%) had metastatic disease at the time of enrollment. Median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1. Patients received gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) i.v. and docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly for 3 out of 4 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. RESULTS: Patients received a median of 4 cycles (range 1-6) of chemotherapy. An objective response was obtained in 10 patients (27%) with a median duration of 17 weeks. Median survival was 7 months, and 1-year survival was 19.3%. Eight patients experienced at least one form of grade 4 toxicity and 27 patients experienced at least one type of grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel is a well-tolerated regimen with clinical efficacy. The ultimate role of this combination versus single-agent gemcitabine can only be determined by a randomized phase III trial.