RESUMO
When observers are asked to localize the peripheral position of a small probe with respect to the mid-position of a spatially extended comparison stimulus, they tend to judge the probe as being more peripheral than the mid-position of the comparison stimulus. This relative mislocalization seems to emerge from differences in absolute localization, that is the comparison stimulus is localized more towards the fovea than the probe. The present study compared saccadic behaviour and relative localization judgements in three experiments and determined the quantitative relationship between both measures. The results showed corresponding effects in localization errors and saccadic behaviour. Moreover, it was possible to estimate the amount of the relative mislocalization by means of the saccadic amplitude.
RESUMO
In the Fröhlich effect, the perceived onset of a moving stimulus is displaced in the direction of motion. Previously, we observed that pointing movements produced a Fröhlich effect only when the onset position was highly predictable. Here, we show that relative judgments are not affected by spatial predictability if the relative judgment task is performed in isolation. However, when the two tasks vary randomly from trial to trial, effects of spatial predictability carry over to the perceptual task. Thus, observers' intentions before stimulus onset determine the way position signals are processed. An account in terms of sensory and motor maps is discussed.
Assuntos
Julgamento/fisiologia , Percepção de Movimento/fisiologia , Ilusões Ópticas/fisiologia , Adulto , Fixação Ocular , Humanos , Estimulação Luminosa/métodos , Desempenho Psicomotor , PsicofísicaRESUMO
When observers pursue a moving target with their eyes, they use predictions of future target positions in order to keep the target within the fovea. It was suggested that these predictions of smooth pursuit (SP) eye movements are computed only from the visual feedback of the target characteristics. As a consequence, if the target vanishes unexpectedly, the eye movements do not stop immediately, but they overshoot the vanishing point. We compared the spatial and temporal features of such predictive eye movements in a task with or without intentional control over the target vanishing point. If the observers stopped the target with a button press, the overshoot of the eyes was reduced compared to a condition where the offset was computer generated. Accordingly, the eyes started to decelerate well before the target offset and lagged further behind the target when it disappeared. The involvement of intentionally-generated expectancies in eye movement control was also obvious in the spatial trajectories of the eyes, which showed a clear flexion in anticipation of the circular motion path we used. These findings are discussed together with neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the SP eye movements.