Improving the prediction of malignancy in cytologically suspicious thyroid nodules.

BACKGROUND: Fine needle cytology aspirates (FNA) classified as THY4 are a heterogeneous group suspicious for malignancy [papillary thyroid cancer (PTC)], which is confirmed in 50-80% of cases after surgery. AIM: To better stratify THY4 FNA specimens for the relative risk of malignancy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 78 thyroid nodules classified as THY4 because of the presence of atypical cells, hypercellular trabeculae and/or intranuclear inclusions (ICI), in the absence of papillae. Two subgroups were identified: group 1 (38 nodules), showing ICI with (no.=17) or without (no.=21) trabeculae and cellular atypia, and group 2 (40 nodules), showing trabeculae and atypia but without ICI. RESULTS: PTC was detected at histology in 56/78 of the patients (71.8%). Malignancy occurred in 36/38 (94.7%) of the patients in group 1 and in 20/40 (50.0%) of the patients in group 2. Therefore, the positive predictive value (PPV) for PTC was 97.3% in the ICI+ specimens (group 1), with a sensitivity of 64.3% and specificity of 95.2%. When only ICI was present, without atypia and trabeculae, the PPV and specificity were similar (95.0 and 95.2%, respectively), but the sensitivity was decreased (48.7%). In specimens without ICI (group 2), the PPV was only 50.0%; however, combined with young age (<40 yr) and male gender, it reached a value similar to that of group1. CONCLUSIONS: In ICI+ specimens compared to ICI-, the risk of PTC is nearly doubled, since PPV increases from 50.0% to 97.3%. This observation suggests that surgery should be considered mandatory in all lesions classified THY4 at FNA, although the relevant difference in terms of cancer risk between ICI- vs ICI+ nodules might be an useful information for both the clinician and the patient.

Influence of glucose load on cardiovascular and humoral responses to a cold pressure test.

To investigate the relationship between insulin and reactivity to the cold pressure test four groups of mildly obese patients (12 per group: normotensive, essential hypertensive, normotensive (N-NIDD) and hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetics (H-NIDD)) underwent a standardised oral glucose tolerance test. During the test, BP and heart rate were monitored and venous blood samples were obtained at 0, 60 and 120 minutes to determine serum levels of glucose, insulin (microU/ml), sodium, potassium (mEq/I), renin activity (ng/ml/hour), aldosterone, noradrenaline and adrenaline. The cold pressure tests were performed before glucose ingestion (I-CPT) and again at 60 minute after ingestion (II-CPT). As expected, glucose ingestion caused a significant increase in glycaemia and serum insulin; the latter rose significantly more at 60 minutes in normotensives (85 +/- 6) and essential hypertensives (83 +/- 5) than in N-NIDD (30 +/- 4) and H-NIDD (29 +/- 3). Plasma K significantly decreased in normotensives (4.4 +/- 0.1 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.1, P < 0.05) and essential hypertensives (4.3 +/- 0.1 vs. 3.5 +/- 0.1, P < 0.05) but did not change in either N-NIDD or H-NIDD. PRA significantly increased in normotensives (0.6 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.1, P < 0.01) and essential hypertensives (0.8 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.2, P < 0.05) but did not change in N-NIDD or H-NIDD. Plasma sodium and catecholamines did not change in any group. I-CPT induced similar reactivity in all the groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the lisinopril + hydrochlorothiazide and captopril + hydrochlorothiazide combinations in the treatment of essential arterial hypertension]. / Valutazione della sicurezza e dell'efficacia delle associazioni lisinopril + idroclorotiazide e captopril + idroclorotiazide nel trattamento dell'ipertensione arteriosa essenziale.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the combinations of lisinopril (LIS) 20 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg and captopril (CAP) 50 mg + HCTZ 25 mg in moderately hypertensive patients not adequately controlled by LIS or CAP alone. The study was multicentre (11 centres), open, random and carried out in parallel groups. After two weeks' placebo run in patients were randomly assigned to LIS 10-20 mg/o.d. or CAP 25-50 mg/b.i.d. treatment for 6 weeks. After this, patients with supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) greater than 90 mmHg were treated with the combinations LIS 20 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg/o.d. or CAP 50 mg + HCTZ 25 mg/o.d. for 4 weeks; this dose was doubled if DBP was found to be greater than 90 mmHg after 2 weeks' combined therapy. A total of 175 patients were enrolled (92 females and 83 males) of which 153 completed the study. The LIS + HCTZ association caused a significant reduction of DBP in comparison to the other combined treatment (88.1 +/- 0.7 vs 90.3 +/- 0.7; p = 0.026). The statistical analysis of mean SBP values showed no significant difference between the two groups (144.0 +/- 1.3 vs 146.8 +/- 1.3; p = 0.15). At the end of the study 79.5% of patients treated with LIS + HCTZ presented normal results (DBP less than or equal to 90 mmHg), whereas the percentage of similar results in the comparison group was 72%. The percentage of "responder" patients to therapy (DBP reduced by 10 mmHg or more in relation to basal values) was 96.3% in the LIS + HCTZ group and 86.7% in the CAP + HCTZ group. In the CAP + HCTZ group 0.6% of patients reported adverse reactions, while only 0.3% were observed in the LIS + HCTZ group.

Persistent albuminuria in normotensive non-insulin-dependent (type II) diabetic patients: comparative effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-adrenoceptor blockers.

1. Some non-insulin-dependent (type II) diabetic patients show albuminuria without arterial hypertension. In these patients, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce urinary albumin excretion without producing any changes in systemic blood pressure and renal haemodynamics. However, up to now it has not been clear whether these favourable renal effects are specifically related to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition or not. 2. Twelve type II diabetic outpatients with persistent macroalbuminuria (greater than 300 mg/daily on at least three consecutive occasions), without any other signs of renal disease and whose blood pressure was persistently below 140/90 mmHg, were studied. 3. In a randomized sequence and in a double-blind fashion, after a 2-month run-in period, patients were allocated to receive 5 mg of enalapril or 50 mg of atenolol daily for the next 6 months. At the end of this first period and after 6 months on placebo in a cross-over fashion, active treatment was replicated. Blood pressure and urinary albumin excretion were measured every 2 months, whereas the other variables studied were determined at the end of each period. 4. Kidney function and blood pressure did not change significantly, whereas albuminuria decreased significantly, after both of the drugs. 5. These data suggest that the inhibition of tissue angiotensin formation and the consequent reduction in glomerular permeability, rather than changes in renal and systemic haemodynamics, are the common mechanisms by which both enalapril and atenolol decreased albuminuria in our patients.

Comparative effects of enalapril, atenolol and chlorthalidone on blood pressure and kidney function of diabetic patients affected by arterial hypertension and persistent proteinuria.

Arterial hypertension and proteinuric nephropathy are common features in diabetic patients. In streptozotocin-diabetic rats, it has been possible to reduce the blood pressure and proteinuria by converting enzyme inhibitors, and so slowing the decline of kidney function. These results have been confirmed in diabetic patients affected by arterial hypertension and persistent proteinuria. However, up to now it has not been clear if these favorable renal effects are related specifically to converting enzyme inhibition. In the attempt to clarify this last point, from a practical as well as from a speculative point of view, 12 type 2 diabetic outpatients affected by mild to moderate arterial hypertension and persistent macroalbuminuria (greater than 250 mg/daily, at least on three consecutive occasions) without any other signs of renal diseases were studied. In a randomized sequence and in a double blind fashion, after a washout period of 3 weeks, the patients underwent pharmacological treatment which consisted of enalapril 20 mg o.d., chlorthalidone 12.5 mg o.d., atenolol 50 mg o.d. and placebo o.d. Each treatment lasted 45 days. Kidney function, blood pressure and heart rate were checked at the beginning and at the end of each treatment, while urinary albumin excretion was measured at the end of the 4th, 5th, and 6th week of each treatment. Blood pressure significantly decreased in a similar fashion after each active treatment, while kidney function did not change significantly. Urinary albumin excretion rate significantly decreased after enalapril and atenolol, but did not change after chlorthalidone. According to these results we can hypothesize that the inhibition of tissue angiotensin formation and its related change on the glomerular permeability, rather than renal and systemic hemodynamic features, seem to be the common mechanisms by which both enalapril as well as atenolol decrease the albuminuria in our patients.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in normotensive type II diabetics with persistent mild proteinuria.

To evaluate the effect of enalapril on proteinuria, 16 normotensive type II diabetics with persistent proteinuria were studied. At random, the patients were allocated to enalapril (5 mg once a day) or placebo, in a double-blind fashion, for 12 months. Blood pressure, heart rate, urinary albumin excretion, plasma renin activity and aldosterone, blood glucose, serum fructosamine, urine urea and body weight were checked monthly during the run-in period and every 2 months during the treatment period. The kidney function was studied at the beginning of the study and during the sixth and 12th months. Enalapril decreased urinary albumin excretion in our patients in the absence of any effect on blood pressure and kidney function. Our data may be interpreted on the basis of a direct vascular effect of enalapril that is probably related to a tissue mechanism consisting of reduced angiotensin formation, increased kinins, or both, or of other unknown factors.

Hemodynamic, renal, and humoral effects of the calcium entry blocker nicardipine and converting enzyme inhibitor captopril in hypertensive type II diabetic patients with nephropathy.

We compared the effect of nicardipine, a dihydropiridine derivative calcium entry blocker (CEB), with that of captopril (CAP), a converting-enzyme inhibitor (CEI), and that of the two drugs combined, on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and renal function in 12 hypertensive type II diabetic outpatients with nephropathy (persistent proteinuria greater than 500 mg/24 h) according to a 2 x 2 factorial design. For 4-week treatments, the patients received nicardipine (NIC) 20 mg t.i.d., CAP 50 mg b.i.d., NIC plus CAP, and matched placebo. Each active treatment significantly reduced BP, with an additive effect of NIC and CAP combined versus either drug alone. HR did not change. Effective renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GRF) were unmodified, but renal vascular resistances (RVRs) were significantly reduced by the three active treatments. Filtration fraction (FF) did not change with NIC or with NIC plus CAP and was significantly reduced with CAP. Urinary albumin excretion (UAE) was significantly reduced by each active treatment to a similar extent. Plasma renin activity (PRA) increased significantly with NIC plus CAP only and did not change when the drugs were administered singly. Plasma aldosterone, glucose, potassium, fructosamine, and urinary sodium and volume did not change during the trial. We conclude that the two drugs singly and combined are useful for treatment of hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDD) patients with persistent proteinuria.

Systemic and renal effects of chronic angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition with captopril in hypertensive diabetic patients.

Nine outpatients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus and persistent macroalbuminuria were studied. After 1 month of placebo, the patients were treated with 50 mg captopril twice a day for the following 6 months. Blood pressure and urinary albumin excretion were significantly reduced but no relationship was found between these two variables. No changes were detected in the renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate, filtration fraction, renal vascular resistance or metabolic pattern. Captopril significantly reduced blood pressure and albuminuria without any change in the renal function. The decrease in albuminuria may be related to the reduction in blood pressure as well as to a direct effect of captopril on glomerular haemodynamics.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition with a low dose of enalapril in normotensive diabetics with persistent proteinuria.

Angiotensin II is the main regulator of both glomerular haemodynamics and glomerular capillary permeability. An alteration in the function of intrarenal angiotensin II seems to be the cause of diabetic glomerulopathy in animals and humans. In order to investigate the renal effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril (5 mg once a day), 24 normotensive diabetic patients with persistent proteinuria, after a 3-month run-in period, were randomly allocated to receive the active drug (12 patients) or the corresponding placebo, for the 6 months. Effective renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate, renal vascular resistance and filtration fraction were measured at the end of the run-in and the treatment periods. Blood pressure, heart rate, urinary albumin excretion, plasma renin activity and aldosterone, blood glucose, serum fructosamine and body weight were checked monthly during the run-in and every 2 months during the treatment period. Enalapril decreased urinary albumin excretion in the normotensive diabetic patients without any changes in systemic blood pressure or glomerular haemodynamics. These results indicate that ACE inhibition interferes with the glomerular capillary permeability induced by angiotensin II.

Humoral and hemodynamic effects of nitrendipine versus clonidine in patients with essential hypertension.

A single-blind, randomized controlled study was conducted to assess and compare the antihypertensive effectiveness and the effects on glucose tolerance and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone balance of nitrendipine (Bay e 5009), a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, and clonidine. Twenty-six outpatients with uncomplicated mild to moderate essential hypertension were randomly allocated to receive 20 mg of nitrendipine or 0.25 mg of clonidine (slow-release formulation) daily for five weeks. One patient in the clonidine group dropped out. Both treatments significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressures with negligible modifications in heart rate. However, diastolic blood pressure was reduced significantly more (P less than 0.001) with nitrendipine. Accordingly, 12 of 13 patients given nitrendipine attained the goal of diastolic pressure less than or equal to 90 mmHg, according to criteria of the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program, while only three of 12 patients in the clonidine group achieved this goal. Side effects were mild and transient in both treatment groups. No definite trends in plasma renin activity or plasma aldosterone concentration, or in blood glucose or immunoreactive insulin (measured both in fasting conditions and after an oral glucose tolerance test), were evident when baseline and posttreatment values were compared. The results of this study suggest that nitrendipine is an effective and safe antihypertensive agent and is devoid of adverse effects on glucose tolerance and renin-aldosterone homeostasis.

Humoral and haemodynamic interactions between clonidine and nifedipine in human essential hypertension.

Acute administration of nifedipine (NIF), a calcium entry blocker (CEB), in animals reduces the hypotensive effect of clonidine (CLN), an alpha-adrenergic agonist. In order to evaluate possible negative interactions between NIF and CLN in man during chronic treatment with these drugs, 12 patients with mild to moderate uncomplicated essential hypertension received either NIF (20 mg twice daily), CLN (0.25 mg once daily), the two drugs together at the same doses, or their matched placebos for a 2-week period each. NIF (-13.5% versus placebo) and CLN (-10.2% versus placebo) decreased blood pressure significantly and when combined, blood pressure was further decreased (-17.1% versus placebo). Heart rate was increased by NIF and NIF + CLN but unchanged by CLN alone. Plasma renin activity (PRA) tended to increase with NIF, decreased with CLN (P < 0.05) and was unchanged with NIF + CLN. Plasma aldosterone did not vary during any of the phases of the trial. These results indicate that NIF and CLN do not interact negatively on blood pressure control in essential hypertensive subjects.

The role of endogenous opioids in the baroreflex dysfunction of dialysis patients.

We studied the effect of the opiate antagonist naloxone on the response to Valsalva manoeuvre in nine dialysis patients, in six diabetics with normal renal function whose response to Valsalva manoeuvre was similar to that of dialysis patients and in eight healthy subjects. Naloxone caused a progressive increase in the subnormal Valsalva ratio in dialysis patients but it did not cause any change in diabetics nor in healthy subjects. The increase in Valsalva ratio observed in dialysis patients was due to restoration of the parasympathetically mediated reflex bradycardia of the release phase of the manoeuvre. Endogenous opioids may be responsible for the baroreflex dysfunction of dialysis patients.

Influence of food on acute and chronic effects of captopril in essential hypertensive patients.

To determine if food reduces the hemodynamic and humoral effects of captopril in patients with essential hypertension, we performed two studies. In the acute study, 15 inpatients with uncomplicated essential hypertension randomly received a single oral dose of placebo or captopril (25 mg) while fasting or after eating, or captopril (50 mg) after eating. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured every 30 min up to 4 h (and up to 10 h in six out of the 15 patients), while plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone, and serum angiotensin-converting enzyme were measured 2 h after dosing. Compared with placebo, captopril significantly reduced mean blood pressure (p less than 0.001), serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (p less than 0.005), and aldosterone (p less than 0.001), increased plasma renin activity (p less than 0.05), and did not change heart rate; there was no difference between the fasting and the fed state. In the six patients followed up to 10 h, captopril both before and after food significantly and similarly reduced mean blood pressure up to 8 h (p less than or equal to 0.05). In the chronic study, 10 patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension, while having prolonged (3-12 months) treatment with captopril (50 mg twice a day), were asked to take captopril for 1 month 1 h before eating and for another month during or immediately after eating. The sequence was randomized, and blood pressure, heart rate, plasma renin activity, serum angiotensin-converting enzyme, and plasma aldosterone were measured at the end of each period 12 h after last dosing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hemodynamic and humoral interactions between captopril and nifedipine.

Nine patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension received, according to a randomized sequence, captopril (25 mg three times daily), nifedipine (10 mg three times daily), and both drugs for 1 week, with each treatment period separated by a 1-week interval during which a placebo was given. Captopril significantly reduced blood pressure and plasma aldosterone, increased plasma renin activity (PRA), and did not change heart rate. Nifedipine exerted a similar effect on blood pressure and PRA, but it increased heart rate and did not change aldosterone. Captopril plus nifedipine further reduced blood pressure and increased PRA, did not change heart rate, and reduced aldosterone to values similar to those after captopril alone. The hypotensive effect of captopril was highly predictable by basal PRA values, and that of nifedipine by age, while PRA increments induced by captopril were unrelated to those induced by nifedipine. These data indicate that: 1) captopril and nifedipine exert an additive effect on blood pressure and renin; 2) captopril counteracts the heart rate increase induced by nifedipine; 3) nifedipine does not influence the aldosterone inhibition induced by captopril. It is suggested that the association of the two drugs can be usefully employed in the treatment of hypertension.