Medical school origins of award-winning psychiatrists; analysis of a complete national dataset.

BACKGROUND: Britain attracts doctors from all over the world to work in the National Health Service. Elucidating the educational backgrounds of award-winning doctors working in the country is potentially an important medical education issue and a merit award audit. Using the British clinical merit award schemes as outcome measures, we identify medical school origins of award-winning doctors who have been identified as having achieved national or international prominence. METHODS: The Clinical Excellence Awards/Distinction Awards schemes select doctors in Britain who are classified as high achievers, with categories for national prominence and above. We used this outcome measure in a quantitative observational analysis of the 2019-20 dataset of all 901 award-winning doctors. Pearson's Chi-Square test was used where appropriate. RESULTS: Five university medical schools (London university medical schools, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Aberdeen and Cambridge) accounted for 59.1% of the psychiatrist award-winning doctors in the 2019 round, despite the dataset representing 85 medical schools. 84.1% of the psychiatrist award-winners were from European medical schools, compared to 92.1% of the non-psychiatrist award-winners. International medical graduates accounted for 22.7% of the award-winning psychiatrists. Psychiatrists with the lower grade national awards came from a more diverse educational background of 17 medical schools. IMGs represented diverse medical schools from five continents and were most represented in the lowest grade of national merit awards at 24.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the award-winning psychiatrists originated from only five medical schools. A greater diversity of medical school origin existed for the lowest grade national psychiatrist award-winners. International medical graduates contributed substantially to these award-winners; psychiatrist award-winners were more likely to be international medical graduates (22.7%) than non-psychiatrist award-winners (10.8%). This study not only indicates educational centres associated with the production of award-winners but also provides students with a roadmap for rational decision making when selecting medical schools.

Early career doctors' experiences of psychiatry placements: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: On completion of a medical degree, junior doctors in the UK undergo a 2 year Foundation Programme. Since 2016, 45% of Foundation Programme doctors are required to undertake a psychiatry placement during foundation training. During this time, recruitment to Core Psychiatry Training has fluctuated, dropping to a 69% fill rate in 2017. METHODS: With the support of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, Health Education England and the UK Foundation Programme Office, a large-scale study was formulated utilising semi-structured focus groups. These exploring participant experiences help to understand how and if the psychiatry foundation placements are valuable, and their potential influence on a trainee choosing psychiatry as a career. A framework analysis was used to analyse data. RESULTS: Seventy-four participants across 10 foundation schools in England participated. Experiences and perceptions were split into three broad themes; pre-placement, during placement, and post-placement. Within these, 12 sub-themes emerged. Doctors valued independence and responsibility especially if accompanied by a level of support from seniors. They also enjoyed working as part of a multi-disciplinary team. However, there were clear issues around staffing levels, stigma attached to psychiatry, and out of hours working. DISCUSSION: The pre-placement perceptions of psychiatry as a specialty as well as the trainees' personal priorities for career selection were influenced by psychiatry placement experiences. The results have important implications for the recruitment to the specialty and need to be considered when designing and constructing placement aims.