SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF STRENGTH TRAINING IN SPINAL AND BULBAR MUSCULAR ATROPHY: A CASE REPORT.

Objective: Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy is characterized by slow-progressive muscle weakness, decreased functional performance and falls. Research into the use of exercise in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy has shown equivocal to negative results, although authors suggest that patients with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy may benefit from both increased exercise intensity and shorter bout duration. The aim of this case report is to explore the safety of a moderate intensity strength training programme coupled with dynamic balance and function-specific training in a patient with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Case report: A 56-year-old man with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy presented with multiple falls and declining performance in physical, vocational, and recreational activities. Examination revealed several musculoskeletal impairments that were sub-clinical to mild compared with an SBMA natural history cohort. Intervention and outcome: A 15-week moderate intensity exercise programme combining weight-lifting and functional exercises was performed under clinical supervision. Exercise volume, frequency and intensity were adjusted based on patient-reported outcomes and muscle damage blood markers. Performance-based and self-reported functional improvements occurred that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference. The intervention was well tolerated and the patient nearly doubled his baseline 10-repetition maximums for weight-lifting exercises. Conclusion: Exercise therapy combining weight-lifting and upright functional training led to meaningful performance improvements in this case of a patient with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy and relatively low disease burden.

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma in a patient on Fingolimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: There are multiple case reports in the literature describing an association between fingolimod and cutaneous neoplasms. OBJECTIVE: Investigate and report a case of a primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma in a patient on fingolimod for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: Case Report. RESULTS: The patient developed a primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma after seven years of treatment with fingolimod. The patient is currently in complete remission after cessation of treatment, surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. CONCLUSION: This case report highlights the first primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma associated with fingolimod treatment. It should be considered a rare, but potential adverse effect of fingolimod.

The Erlanger chest pain evaluation protocol: a one-year experience with serial 12-lead ECG monitoring, two-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing to identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We determine the overall use of a 6-step accelerated chest pain protocol to identify and exclude acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to confirm previous findings of the use of serial 12-lead ECG monitoring (SECG) in conjunction with 2-hour delta serum marker measurements to identify and exclude acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted over a 1-year period from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 1999, in 2,074 consecutive patients with chest pain who underwent our accelerated evaluation protocol, which includes 2-hour delta serum marker determinations in conjunction with automated SECG for the early identification and exclusion of AMI and selective nuclear stress testing for identification and exclusion of ACS. In patients not undergoing emergency reperfusion therapy, physician judgment was used to determine patient disposition at the completion of the 2-hour evaluation period: admit for ACS, discharge or admit for non-ACS condition, or immediate emergency department nuclear stress scan for possible ACS. A positive protocol was defined as a positive result in 1 or more of the 6 incremental steps in our chest pain evaluation protocol: (1) initial ECG diagnostic of acute injury or reciprocal injury; (2) baseline creatine kinase (CK)-MB level of 10 ng/mL or greater and index of 5% or greater or cardiac troponin I level of 2 ng/mL or greater; (3) new/evolving injury or new/evolving ischemia on SECG; (4) increase in CK-MB level of +1.5 ng/mL or greater or cardiac troponin I level of +0.2 ng/mL or greater in 2 hours; (5) clinical diagnosis of ACS despite a negative 2-hour evaluation; and (6) reversible perfusion defect on stress scan compared with on resting scan. All patients were followed up for 30-day ACS, which was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary arteriography revealing stenosis of major coronary artery of 70% or greater not amenable to percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass grafting, life-threatening complication, or cardiac death within 30 days of ED presentation. RESULTS: Discharge diagnosis in the 2,074 study patients consisted of 179 (8.6%) patients with AMI, 26 (1.3%) patients with recent AMI (decreasing curve of CK-MB), and 327 (15.8%) patients with 30-day ACS. At 2 hours, sensitivity and specificity for MI (AMI or recent AMI) of SECG plus delta serum marker measurements was 93.2% and 93.9%, respectively (positive likelihood ratio 15.3; negative likelihood ratio 0.07). At the completion of the full ED evaluation protocol (positive result in >or=1 of the 6 incremental steps), sensitivity and specificity for 30-day ACS was 99.1% and 87.4%, respectively (positive likelihood ratio 7.9; negative likelihood ratio 0.01). CONCLUSION: An accelerated chest pain evaluation strategy consisting of SECG, 2-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing in conjunction with physician judgment identifies and excludes MI and 30-day ACS during the initial evaluation of patients with chest pain.

Use of baseline ST-vector magnitude to identify electrocardiographic injury in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction.

No information is currently available regarding optimal cut-off values of the ST-vector magnitude (ST-VM) for predicting acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in emergency department (ED) chest pain patients undergoing vectorcardiographic (VCG) monitoring. A prospective observational study was performed in 1,722 chest pain patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and absence of bundle branch block (BBB) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on initial ECG who underwent continuous VCG ST-segment monitoring during the initial ED evaluation. Three cut-off values for baseline ST-VM are reported and represent the smallest values in which the positive likelihood ratio (+LR) for AMI is greater than 5, 10, and 20, respectively. AMI occurred in 158 of 1,722 patients (9.2%) without BBB or LVH on initial ECG. Optimal cut-off values at the predetermined +LR values of 5, 10, and 20, were 121 microV (sensitivity, 41.8%; specificity, 92.0%), 151 microV (sensitivity, 29.1%; specificity, 97.1%), and 175 microV (sensitivity, 25.9%; specificity, 98.7%), respectively. Combining the earlier-mentioned cut-off values with physician judgment of initial pretest probability (high, intermediate, or low, respectively) resulted in a relative increase in identification of injury of 37.5% as compared with the ED physician's interpretation of initial ECG (41.8% v 30.4%; P <.0001), and 65.2% as compared with the official ECG interpretation (41.8% v 25.3%; P <.0001). Increasing ST-VM results in increasing likelihood of AMI. Clinical studies need to be performed to determine if ST-VM cut-off values of 121, 151, and 175 microV in conjunction with physician pretest probability of AMI can be used as criterion for emergent reperfusion therapy in patients without LVH or BBB on the initial ECG.