Comparison of self-assessment and expert assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals.

OBJECTIVES: Occupational assessments of chemical exposure are often inadequate because of difficulties in obtaining sufficient numbers of measurements by trained professionals (experts). The objective of this study was to determine whether workers can provide unbiased data via self-assessments of exposure facilitated by the use of simple passive monitors for personal sampling. METHODS: Untrained workers obtained personal measurements of their exposures to gaseous contaminants (terpenes in sawmills and styrene in reinforced plastics factories) with passive monitors and written instructions. To study the validity of the self-assessments, an occupational hygienist performed exposure measurements on the same occupational groups after the workers had obtained two or more measurements independently. The potential bias of the self-assessments was evaluated by comparing the self-assessments with the expert assessments in mixed-effects statistical models. RESULTS: A total of 153 terpene (97 self and 56 expert) and 216 styrene (159 self and 57 expert) measurements were obtained from four sawmills and six reinforced plastics factories, respectively. No significant differences in the geometric mean exposures were observed between the self-assessments and the expert assessments in 3 of 4 sawmills and 5 of 6 reinforced plastics factories (P > 0.10). The potential bias of the self-assessments of exposure ranged from less than 0.1% to 102% and was less than 17% in 9 of the 10 groups investigated. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that untrained, unsupervised workers are able to collect consistently unbiased exposure data by employing currently available passive monitors.

Self-assessment of exposure--a pilot study of assessment of exposure to benzene in tank truck drivers.

Occupational hygienists or safety engineers perform exposure assessments, mostly with very little participation by the workers. The objective of our study is to involve the workers themselves in the assessment and measurement procedure, the self-assessment method (SAE). A pilot study has been carried out involving tank truck drivers at a company transporting gasoline. The drivers were supposed to decide themselves when, and how often, they wanted to measure benzene exposure by using diffusive samplers that were then sent by mail for analysis. After every measurement they received their own results in a personal document for interpretation. The company management also received a document, which summarized all the drivers' measurements. Expert measurements, with the same type of sampler, were also accomplished to evaluate the self-assessments. The geometric mean and the 95 percent confidence intervals of the measurements made by the drivers (29 measurements) was 0.17 (0.11-0.26), and by an occupational hygienist (8 measurements) 0.12 mg/m3 (0.04-0.37). The results show that the drivers technically can perform SAE. Interviews with the workers and the management indicated that some kind of organizational support within the company is needed to implement the method into the regular internal control of the working environment.

Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor at a workstation and at a personal.

With the introduction of picture and archiving communicating systems an alternative image display for the wards might be a personal computer (PC). The intention with this study was to evaluate the diagnostic image quality of the monitor of a PC compared to that of a workstation. Eighty-five digital radiographs of a chest phantom with simulated tumors in the mediastinum and right lung were saved on optical discs. The examination were reviewed by 4 radiologists on a monitor at a workstation and at a PC, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed. No significant difference was found between performance of the PC and the workstation.