Open reduction and internal fixation of paediatric maxillozygomatic complex fractures: An 11-year multicentric retrospective study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Paediatric maxillozygomatic complex (MZC) fractures are uncommon, and there is a scarcity of data regarding their surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to analyse choices and outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for MZC fractures among 14 maxillofacial centers around the world. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicentric retrospective observational study included patients ≤16 years of age with quadripod MZC fractures treated with ORIF from January 2011 and December 2022. The following data were collected: age, gender, dentition stage (deciduous, mixed, and permanent), cause of injury, type of fracture, surgical approach, site of osteosynthesis (infraorbital rim, zygomaticomaxillary buttress, frontozygomatic, and zygomaticotemporal sutures), material (titanium or resorbable) and number of plates used, and outcome. The minimum follow-up was 6 months. Statistical analyses were performed with Fisher's exact test or chi-squared test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (mean age, 12.3 years) with quadripod MZC fractures were included. Seventy-two percent of patients received a single-point fixation. The zygomaticomaxillary buttress was the most common site for fixation, both in single-point and two-point fixation schemes, especially in combination with the frontozygomatic suture. Increasing age was associated with a higher rate of plate removal (p < .001). Postoperative complications included 5 (7.8%) cases of wound infections, 2 (3.1%) infraorbital paraesthesia, 1 (1.6%) ectropion. Residual facial asymmetry was found in 5 (7.8%) patients and was not associated with the type of fixation (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the possibility of using ORIF, even with a single point of fixation, for the treatment of displaced quadripod MZC fractures in the paediatric population. The zygomaticomaxillary buttress was the preferred site of fixation and allowed for adequate stabilization with no external scars and a low risk of tooth damage. Future prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to establish definitive surgical protocols and clarify the surgical decision-making.

Pediatric mandibular fractures: Surgical management and outcomes in the deciduous, mixed and permanent dentitions.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Mandibular fractures are the most frequent type of pediatric facial traumatic injury, but their treatment remains controversial. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the surgical treatment and long-term outcomes of dentate mandibular fractures in children and adolescents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with mandibular fractures in the dentate area who were surgically treated in the period from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2020, were included. The following data were collected: age, gender, cause and mechanism of injury, fracture site and type, associated maxillofacial fractures, the timing of surgical treatment, Facial Injury Severity Scale (FISS) score, surgical approach, number and thickness of plates, hospitalization stay and outcome. Patients were divided into three groups: deciduous (≤6 years, group A), mixed (7-12 years, group B), and permanent (13-18 years, group C) dentitions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: During the study 91 patients (male: female ratio, 3.8:1), 4 in group A, 12 in group B, and 75 in group C, with 65 single and 52 double fractures were included. An intraoral approach was used in 87% of patients. In group C, 90% of patients were treated with fixation schemes consistent with those suggested in the literature for adults, versus 75% in groups A and B. Median follow-up time was 20 months. No tooth germ injury or facial asymmetry was observed and only six group C patients had post-operative malocclusions. Hardware removal occurred in 22% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This 20-year retrospective study shows that open reduction and internal fixation of pediatric dentate mandibular fractures caused no tooth germ damage or disturbances of mandibular growth in any dentition stage. Internal fixation schemes were similar to those used for adults, although it was necessary to adapt hardware size and position according to tooth and patient age.

Comparison of Efficacy among Three Dermal Substitutes in the Management of Critical Lower-Limb Wounds: The Largest Biases-Reduced Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Literature.

Background and objectives: The skin recently became the main focus of regenerative medicine and, in this context, skin substitutes are fully entering into the plastic surgeon's armamentarium. Among the various types of skin substitutes, dermal substitutes (DSs) are the most used. Our study aims to retrospectively compare three renowned and extremely similar DS in the management of critical lower limb wounds in the largest cohort analysis currently present in literature. Materials and Methods: We followed a strict protocol of application and evaluation of the DS for each patient and wound and, after a meticulous bias reduction process, we compared final outcomes in terms of efficacy and speed in achieving the defect coverage. Results: Among patients who did not receive a skin graft after the DS, we registered a wound healed surface of 50% for Pelnac, 52% for Integra, and 19% for Nevelia, after 30 days from the external silicon layer removal; among those who received a skin graft after the DS, we observed a significantly lower mean percentage of graft take after 7 days with Pelnac (53%) compared to Integra and Nevelia (92% and 80%, respectively). The overall percentage of wound healed surface obtained after 30 days from the external silicon sheet removal, either with or without skin graft, was 71% for Pelnac, 63% for Integra and 63% for Nevelia. We also ran a sub-group analysis only including grafted wounds with a negative microbiological test and the mean percentage of graft take was similar this time. Eventually, we assessed the influence of the wound's "chronicity" on its healing, comparing the mean graft take only in "acute" wounds who received a skin graft and it resulted 63% for Pelnac, 91% for Integra and 75% for Nevelia. Conclusions: Integra demonstrates the highest rate of skin graft viability and the highest rate of skin graft takes after 7 days. Pelnac shows the quickest induction of secondary healing in acute wounds. Nevelia is not different from Integra and shows a superior graft take compared to Pelnac, but features the lowest secondary healing induction rate. No differences exist between the three DSs in terms of wound healing after 30 days from the skin graft or from the removal of the external silicon layer.