Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 86(9): 1153-1158, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32812770

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pain control is an important aspect of rib fracture management. With a rise in multimodal care approaches, we hypothesized that transdermal lidocaine patches reduce opioid utilization in hospitalized patients with acute rib fractures not requiring continuous opioid infusion. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult trauma patients with acute rib fractures admitted to the Trauma Service from January 2011 to October 2018. We compared patients who received transdermal lidocaine patches to those who did not and evaluated cumulative opioid consumption, expressed in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Secondary outcomes included the rate of pulmonary complications and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Of the 21 190 trauma admissions, 3927 (18.5%) had rib fractures. Overall, 1555 patients who received continuous opioid infusion were excluded. Of the remaining 2372 patients, 725 (30.6%) patients received lidocaine patches. The mean total MME of patients who received lidocaine patches was 55.7 MME (30.7 MME on multivariate analysis) and was lower than that of patients who did not receive lidocaine patches (P ≤ .01). There was no difference in hospital length of stay (no lidocaine patches vs received lidocaine patches: 6.2 days vs 6.5 days, P = .34) or pulmonary complications (1.7% vs 2.8%, P = .08). DISCUSSION: In admitted trauma patients with acute rib fractures not requiring continuous intravenous opiates, lidocaine patch use was associated with a significant decrease in opiate utilization during the patients' hospital course.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacologia , Lidocaína/farmacologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/prevenção & controle , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Fraturas das Costelas/terapia , Anestésicos Locais/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
J Pediatr Surg ; 55(9): 1766-1772, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32029235

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Liberal use of CT scanning in children with blunt trauma risks unnecessary radiation exposure and cost. Recent literature questions the utility of whole-body CT in stable children without clinical evidence of significant injury, but this is often done based on injury mechanism. The purpose of this study is to quantify the utilization of CT scans of the head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis based on injury severity in these body regions and to assess the impact of American College of Surgeons (ACS) pediatric trauma center designation on CT utilization in children with minor or no injuries. METHODS: We queried the National Trauma Databank for 2014, 2015, and 2016 to identify all patients 14 years and younger. Using Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score as a proxy for injury severity, we analyzed the number of head, thoracic, and abdominal CT scans done for patients at low levels of injury severity (AIS 0-2) in each of these body regions and according to trauma center level designation (ACS I, II, III, standalone pediatric I or II, and non ACS accredited). RESULTS: Of 257,661 children who were entered into the database for any reason, overall CT utilization was 20% for head, 5% for the chest and 9% for the abdomen and pelvis. Children with no injuries or minimal injury to the head were scanned 7% and 46% of the time, respectively, for the chest 3% and 13% and for the abdomen 6% and 30%. For all body regions and all levels of injury severity, level 1 stand-alone pediatric centers displayed significantly lower CT utilization rates than others. CONCLUSION: CT scan rates for children with minimal or no injuries to the head, chest, abdomen and pelvis are significant. Level 1 stand-alone pediatric trauma centers are least likely to perform these studies. Widespread education and acceptance of clinical guidelines for imaging in stable patients throughout trauma systems could alleviate this disparity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III retrospective comparative study.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Abdominais/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
3.
Pediatr Dev Pathol ; 22(1): 75-79, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29890901

RESUMO

Gastrointestinal diaphragm disease is a rare entity characterized by the formation of thin membranous circumferential mucosal septa, resulting in marked narrowing of the intestinal lumen. The most frequent etiology is the chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Idiopathic cases and other possible etiologies have been reported. We present a rare association of diaphragm disease with Crohn's disease in a boy without a history of significant NSAID usage.


Assuntos
Cápsulas Endoscópicas , Doença de Crohn/patologia , Corpos Estranhos , Doenças do Íleo/etiologia , Íleo/patologia , Mucosa Intestinal/patologia , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Adolescente , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Doenças do Íleo/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças do Íleo/patologia , Íleo/diagnóstico por imagem , Mucosa Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução Intestinal/patologia , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...