Longitudinal screening and management of fatigue, pain, and emotional distress associated with cancer therapy.

GOALS OF WORK: Fatigue, pain, and emotional distress are common symptoms among patients with cancer. We sought to learn about patient perceptions of these symptoms and their treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At a baseline assessment and two monthly follow-up assessments, we asked a diverse sample of patients with solid tumor or lymphoma (N = 99) about their fatigue, pain and distress, their treatment for these symptoms, and their satisfaction with treatment via standardized questionnaires and semistructured interviews. MAIN RESULTS: In this observational study, patients reported fatigue, pain, emotional distress, and general quality of life at expected levels. Across all assessments, at least half of our sample experienced at least some fatigue, pain, or distress. On the whole, patients and providers do communicate about these concerns, and at least 75% of patients found these discussions helpful when they occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Improved symptom identification and communication may optimize the detection of those at risk of morbidity and decreased quality of life because of excess symptom burden.

Use of a single-item screening tool to detect clinically significant fatigue, pain, distress, and anorexia in ambulatory cancer practice.

Fatigue, pain, distress, and anorexia are four commonly encountered symptoms in cancer. To evaluate the usefulness of a single-item screening for these symptoms, 597 ambulatory outpatients with solid tumors were administered a self-report screening instrument within the first 12 weeks of chemotherapy. Patients rated the severity of each symptom on a 0-10 scale, at its worst over the past three days, with higher ratings associated with higher symptom levels. From this sample, 148 patients also completed a more comprehensive assessment of these symptoms. Two criteria were used to determine optimal cut-off scores on the screening items: 1) the sensitivity and specificity of each screening item to predict clinical cases using receiver-operating characteristics analysis and 2) the proportion of patients at each screening score who reported that some relief of the target symptom would significantly improve their life. Optimal cut-off scores ranged from 4 to 6 depending on the target symptom (area under the curve range=0.68-0.88). Use of single-item screening instruments for fatigue, pain, distress, and anorexia may assist routine clinical assessment in ambulatory oncology practice. In turn, such assessments may improve identification of those at risk of morbidity and decreased quality of life due to excess symptom burden.

Aripiprazole augmentation in treatment-resistant bipolar depression: early response and development of akathisia.

There is growing evidence that atypical antipsychotics may be effective in the treatment of acute bipolar depression. Results from randomized, placebo-controlled trials support the use of quetiapine monotherapy and a combination of olanzapine-fluoxetine in the depressed phase of bipolar disorder, while only limited data exists regarding the use of aripiprazole in this population. To assess the potential effectiveness of aripiprazole in treating acute bipolar depression, a chart review was conducted on 12 patients with treatment-resistant bipolar disorder (I, II, and not otherwise specified [NOS]) who received aripiprazole augmentation for the relief of an acute major depressive episode. After 8 weeks of treatment, 4 of 12 (33%) patients demonstrated a response, defined as a 50% reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. In addition, 5 of 12 (42%) patients newly developed akathisia. This report, though limited by its small sample size and naturalistic design, suggests that the usefulness of aripiprazole in the treatment of bipolar depression may be limited by akathisia.