Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dalton Trans ; 45(8): 3340-61, 2016 Feb 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26791942

RESUMO

Based on a rational ligand design for stabilizing high-valent {Fe(µ-O)2Fe} cores, a new family of dinucleating bis(tetradentate) ligands with varying terminal donor functions has been developed: redox-inert biomimetic carboxylates in H4julia, pyridines in susan, and phenolates in H4hilde(Me2). Based on a retrosynthetic analysis, the ligands were synthesized and used for the preparation of their diferric complexes [(julia){Fe(OH2)(µ-O)Fe(OH2)}]·6H2O, [(julia){Fe(OH2)(µ-O)Fe(OH2)}]·7H2O, [(julia){Fe(DMSO)(µ-O)Fe(DMSO)}]·3DMSO, [(hilde(Me2)){Fe(µ-O)Fe}]·CH2Cl2, [(hilde(Me2)){FeCl}2]·2CH2Cl2, [(susan){FeCl(µ-O)FeCl}]Cl2·2H2O, [(susan){FeCl(µ-O)FeCl0.75(OCH3)0.25}](ClO4)2·0.5MeOH, and [(susan){FeCl(µ-O)FeCl}](ClO4)2·0.5EtOH, which were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, FTIR, UV-Vis-NIR, Mössbauer, magnetic, and electrochemical measurements. The strongly electron-donating phenolates afford five-coordination, while the carboxylates and pyridines lead to six-coordination. The analysis of the ligand conformations demonstrates a strong flexibility of the ligand backbone in the complexes. The different hydrogen-bonding in the secondary coordination sphere of [(julia){Fe(OH2)(µ-O)Fe(OH2)}] influences the C-O, C[double bond, length as m-dash]O, and Fe-O bond lengths and is reflected in the FTIR spectra. The physical properties of the central {Fe(µ-O)Fe} core (d-d, µ-oxo → Fe(III) CT, νas(Fe-O-Fe), J) are governed by the differences in terminal ligands - Fe(III) bonds: strongly covalent π-donation with phenolates, less covalent π-donation with carboxylates, and π-acceptation with pyridines. Thus, [(susan){FeCl(µ-O)FeCl}](2+) is oxidized at 1.48 V vs. Fc(+)/Fc, which is shifted to 1.14 V vs. Fc(+)/Fc by methanolate substitution, while [(julia){Fe(OH2)(µ-O)Fe(OH2)}] is oxidized ≤1 V vs. Fc(+)/Fc. [(hilde(Me2)){Fe(µ-O)Fe}] is oxidized at 0.36 V vs. Fc(+)/Fc to a phenoxyl radical. The catalytic oxidation of cyclohexane with TONs up to 39.5 and 27.0 for [(susan){FeCl(µ-O)FeCl}](2+) and [(hilde(Me2)){Fe(µ-O)Fe}], respectively, indicates the potential to form oxidizing intermediates.

2.
Chem Commun (Camb) ; (19): 2637-9, 2009 May 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19532905

RESUMO

Oxidation of the diferric complex [LFe(III)OFe(III)L] to the monoradical complex [LFe(III)OFe(III)L ](+) and the diradical complex [L Fe(III)OFe(III)L ](2+) is followed by a decay into monomeric complexes including a highly reactive putative [LFe(IV)[double bond, length as m-dash]O] complex.


Assuntos
Compostos Férricos/química , Oxigênio/química , Eletroquímica , Oxirredução , Análise Espectral
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...