Adult fecundity, host plant preferences, field activity and parasitism in the leaf weevil Phyllobius pyri (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).

Adults of the leaf weevil Phyllobius pyri (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) feed on a wide variety of broadleaved trees and occasionally cause severe defoliation in newly established farm woodlands. There is little information, however, on the relative susceptibility of different tree species to damage or on the habitat associations of adults and larvae of P. pyri, which might indicate the conditions that predispose trees to attack. Captures of adult P. pyri in emergence and flight traps in the current study indicated population densities in grassland of 0.5-6.4 adults per m2 at emergence but higher densities up to 13.5 per m2 in young pine plantations, where there was a mixture of grassy patches and young, naturally regenerating birch trees. The close proximity of larval food resources (grass roots) and a favoured adult host-plant, which also occurs in young farm woodlands, provided ideal conditions for P. pyri and allowed high population densities to develop. Feeding and performance experiments indicated that cherry, birch, oak and hornbeam were most susceptible to P. pyri, whereas field maple, hawthorn, rowan, lime and especially ash were resistant. Adult female P. pyri emerged in May reproductively immature and fed on tree foliage for 15.9+/-0.9 days before laying their first batch of eggs. Adults lived for 33.3+/-1.5 days, on average, and females laid a mean of 191.9+/-34.5 eggs (maximum=589) during their lifetime. Eggs hatched after 16-20 days. During 2003 and 2004, 11-16% of adult P. pyri were parasitised by Pygostylus falcatus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and 19-29% were parasitised by Rondania fasciata (Diptera: Tachinidae).

Dieback and recovery in poplar and attack by the hornet clearwing moth, Sesia apiformis (Clerck) (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae).

A survey of 801 poplar trees in central east England in 1999 demonstrated a correlation between crown dieback and infestation by hornet clearwing moth (Sesia apiformis), induced by a period of drought in 1995-1996. To determine whether trees colonised by S. apiformis would subsequently deteriorate and die or whether they could recover despite infestation and damage to the stem, all trees in the original survey were re-assessed in 2001, 2003 and 2005. The repeat surveys showed that trees with 70% or less crown dieback in 1999 replaced their canopy and generally improved by 2005, irrespective of the numbers of S. apiformis in the stem, whereas trees that had 75% or more crown dieback in 1999 either died or declined further. The presence of S. apiformis did not prevent tree recovery, and there was little evidence that infestation slowed the rate of recovery. Populations of S. apiformis, measured in terms of the numbers of adult emergence holes visible in the base of the trees, decreased between 2001 and 2005 at the same time as the amount of dieback visible in the canopy of the poplars markedly decreased. However, the fall in numbers of emergence holes at this time reflected a decline in larval establishment 2-3 years earlier, and indicated that the moth population had responded to a more rapid restoration in the internal state of the trees, which was not reflected immediately by the gradual replacement of dead branches and reduction in dieback symptoms.

Resource limitation of tephritid flies on lesser burdock, Arctium minus (Hill) Bernh. (Compositae).

The intensity of resource exploitation by phytophagous insects is usually considered to reflect population size. For populations of two flowerhead-attacking tephritid flies, however, the resources utilised were not related to the numbers of searching adults. Tephritis bardanae Schrank attacked 11-13% of the total flowerheads each year, and Cerajocera tussilaginis (Fab) 17-65%, despite much wider and uncorrelated variation in adult numbers. Analysis of field data showed that the proportion of flowerheads used was not limited by poor flowerhead quality, but was restricted by (1) the synchronisation of adult activity with the appearance of flowerheads at the correct age for oviposition, and (2) by factors which influenced the ability of female flies to locate available heads. These restrictions were more severe in T. bardanae and explained its relatively low rate of infestation. Both tephritids tended to avoid flowerheads in open areas. The processes governing resource exploitation in each tephritid operated independently of the other, and a partial separation of the two species between flowerhead types and habitats arose simply because of their different timing of attack.

Evidence for an oviposition-deterring pheromone in Tephritis bardanae (Schrank) (Diptera: Tephritidae).

Female Tephritis bardanae (Schrank) exhibit a characteristic ovipositor-dragging behaviour immediately after laying eggs into a flowerbud of Arctium minus (Hill) Bernh. To establish whether this behaviour is associated with an oviposition-deterring pheromone (ODP), female T. bardanae were presented with clean, unattacked flowerbuds and fly activity was monitored using video recording equipment. The distribution of oviposition and fly behaviour were analysed. Avoidance of attacked buds was revealed by the oviposition pattern becoming overdispersed. Spacing out of eggs continued until, on average, each bud contained one egg-batch, after which the distribution became more random or clumped. Analysis of fly behaviour showed that attacked and unattacked buds received similar numbers of visits, but fewer oviposition attempts were made on attacked buds. This behaviour was consistent with use of a contact pheromone deterring repeated oviposition and applied to the bud surface during ovipositor-dragging. Avoidance of attacked buds should increase the efficiency of resource use by T. bardanae populations in the field; however, distributions of egg-batches in flowerhead samples collected from Monks Wood NNR, Cambridgeshire, during 1983-1985, were highly clumped and did not provide supportive evidence. This suggests that the effectiveness of oviposition deterrence in the field is reduced, because the active life of ODP under natural conditions is short, and/or because wild females frequently experience high oviposition drive due to scarcity of suitable flowerbuds.