Education of physicians-in-training can decrease the risk for vascular catheter infection.

BACKGROUND: Procedure instruction for physicians-in-training is usually nonstandardized. The authors observed that during insertion of central venous catheters (CVCs), few physicians used full-size sterile drapes (an intervention proven to reduce the risk for CVC-related infection). OBJECTIVE: To improve standardization of infection control practices and techniques during invasive procedures. DESIGN: Nonrandomized pre-post observational trial. SETTING: Six intensive care units and one step-down unit at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: Third-year medical students and physicians completing their first postgraduate year. INTERVENTION: A 1-day course on infection control practices and procedures given in June 1996 and June 1997. MEASUREMENTS: Surveys assessing physician attitudes toward use of sterile techniques during insertion of CVCs were administered during the baseline year and just before, immediately after, and 6 months after the first course. Preintervention and postintervention use of full-size sterile drapes was measured, and surveillance for vascular catheter-related infection was performed. RESULTS: The perceived need for full-size sterile drapes was 22% in the year before the course and 73% 6 months after the course (P < 0.001). The perceived need for small sterile towels at the insertion site decreased reciprocally (P < 0.001). Documented use of full-size sterile drapes increased from 44% to 65% (P < 0.001). The rate of catheter-related infection decreased from 4.51 infections per 1000 patient-days before the first course to 2.92 infections per 1000 patient-days 18 months after the first course (average decrease, 3.23 infections per 1000 patient-days; P < 0.01). The estimated cost savings of this 28% decrease was at least $63000 and may have exceeded $800000. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of infection control practices through a course is a cost-effective way to decrease related adverse outcomes. If these findings can be reproduced, this approach may serve as a model for physicians-in-training.

A cloud adult: the Staphylococcus aureus-virus interaction revisited.

BACKGROUND: Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is common among health care workers, but outbreaks caused by such carriers are relatively uncommon. We previously reported outbreaks of S. aureus skin infections that affected newborn infants and were attributed to an S. aureus nasal carrier who had had an associated upper respiratory tract infection (UR) during the outbreak period. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the contribution of a nasal methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) carrier (physician 4) who contracted a URI to an outbreak of MRSA infections that involved 8 of 43 patients in a surgical intensive care unit during a 3-week period. DESIGN: An epidemiologic study of an outbreak of MRSA infections and a quantitative investigation of airborne dispersal of S. aureus associated with an experimentally induced rhinoviral infection. SETTING: A university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 43 patients in a surgical intensive care unit and 1 physician. MEASUREMENTS: Molecular typing was done, and risk factors for MRSA colonization were analyzed. Agar settle plates and volumeric air cultures were used to evaluate the airborne dispersal of S. aureus by physician 4 before and after a rhinoviral infection and with or without a surgical mask. RESULTS: A search for nasal carriers of MRSA identified a single physician (physician 4); molecular typing showed that the MRSA strain from physician 4 and those from the patients were identical. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified exposure to physician 4 and duration of ventilation as independent risk factors for colonization with MRSA (P < or = 0.008). Air cultures showed that physician 4 dispersed little S. aureus in the absence of a URI. After experimental induction of a rhinovirus URI, physician 4's airborne dispersal of S. aureus without a surgical mask increased 40- fold; dispersal was significantly reduced when physician 4 wore a mask (P < or = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Physician 4 became a "cloud adult," analogous to the "cloud babies" described by Eichenwald and coworkers who shed S. aureus into the air in association with viral URIs. Airborne dispersal of S. aureus in association with a URI may be an important mechanism of transmission of S. aureus.

Nosocomial infections: validation of surveillance and computer modeling to identify patients at risk.

To estimate the accuracy of routine hospital-wide surveillance for nosocomial infection, the authors performed a validation study at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, a 900-bed tertiary care institution, by daily concurrent surveys of all patients' charts. The study extended over a 10-month period from January to October 1987. The sensitivity and specificity of the reported data were 80.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 72.2-89.2) and 97.5% (95% CI 96.4-98.5), respectively. The predictive values of positive or negative reports of an infection were 75.3% (95% CI 66.3-84.2) and 98.1% (95% CI 97.3-99.1), respectively. In a separate analysis, the data entry system was reviewed for eight descriptive variables among all patients with infections (n = 443) identified over a 2-month period. The data entry was found to be 94-99% accurate. To improve the efficiency of current surveillance, the authors used data gathered during the study to develop a computer model for the identification of patients with a high probability of having a nosocomial infection. The use of stepwise logistic regression identified five variables which independently predicted infection: age of the patient (years), days of antibiotics, days of hospitalization, and the number of days on which urine and/or wound cultures were obtained. Optimal sensitivity and specificity (81.6% and 72.5%, respectively) were found when the model examined patients with an 8% or higher a priori probability of infection; this figure corresponded to a review of 33% of the patients' charts. Increasing the a priori probability would progressively increase specificity and reduce both sensitivity and the number of charts needed for review. If it is prospectively validated, the model may provide a more efficient mechanism by which to conduct hospital-wide surveillance.

Reliability of reporting nosocomial infections in the discharge abstract and implications for receipt of revenues under prospective reimbursement.

Proper reporting of discharge diagnoses, including complications of medical care, is essential for maximum recovery of revenues under the prospective reimbursement system. To evaluate the effectiveness of abstracting techniques in identifying nosocomial infections at discharge, discharge abstracts of patients with nosocomial infections were reviewed during September through November of 1984. Patients with nosocomial infections were identified using modified Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definitions and trained surveillance technicians. Records which did not include the diagnosis of nosocomial infections in the discharge abstract were identified, and potential lost revenues were estimated. We identified 631 infections in 498 patients. On average, only 57 per cent of the infections were properly recorded and coded in the discharge abstract. Of the additional monies which might be anticipated by the health care institution to assist in the cost of care of adverse events, approximately one-third would have been lost due to errors in coding in the discharge abstract. Although these lost revenues are substantial, they constitute but a small proportion of the potential costs to the institution when patients acquire nosocomial infections.

Usefulness of a test for slime production as a marker for clinically significant infections with coagulase-negative staphylococci.

The usefulness of a test for slime production as a marker for clinically significant infections with coagulase-negative staphylococci and its implications for therapy were examined. Hospital records were reviewed for 59 patients from each of whom more than one isolate of coagulase-negative staphylococci was obtained. In patients with a prosthetic device, 81% of 59 infectious episodes were due to a slime-positive coagulase-negative staphylococci. In contrast, 22 noninfectious episodes (in which the organisms were contaminants) were equally distributed between episodes due to slime-positive or slime-negative isolates (P = .005). Only 32% of infections caused by slime-positive organisms, in contrast to 100% of infections caused by slime-negative organisms, were improved by treatment with antibiotics alone (P = .02). Prosthetic device removal in addition to antibiotic treatment significantly improved the outcome in patients with infections due to slime-positive organisms when compared with treatment with antibiotics alone (93% vs. 32% improvement; P = .00025).