Brief communication: Test of a method to identify double-zonal osteon in polarized light microscopy.

OBJECTIVES: Double-zonal osteons (DZ) have been of interest in paleopathological research because they might be linked to physiological pathology. DZ are thought to be evidence of arrested osteon formation with a brief but abrupt increase in mineralization of lamellae occurring during bone remodeling. Originally identified from microradiographs as hypermineralized rings, recent studies have identified DZ from linear polarized light microscopy (PLM). However, PLM does not guarantee the adequate detection of DZ since PLM captures bone birefringence and not hyper-mineralization. Scanning electron microscopy with backscatter electrons (BSE-SEM) allows observation of DZ by detecting differences in mineralization. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether DZ, as identified by BSE-SEM, can indeed be identified with PLM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample consists of an archaeological collection of adult midshaft femurs (n = 30) from St. Matthew cemetery, Quebec City (1771-1860). DZ were identified and counted independently with PLM and BSE-SEM for the same sections. Results from both methods were compared. RESULTS: Chi-square test shows that there was no significant difference between the two methods (p = 0.404). No significant bias was found on Bland-Altman analysis and Cohen's kappa shows a substantial agreement between the two methods (Κ = 0.66). PLM shows a good accuracy (sensitivity 79%, specificity 99.4%) and reliability (Positive Predictive Value: 86.71%; Negative Predictive Value: 99.45%). DISCUSSION: These findings indicate that the two methods are interchangeable. PLM, using our proposed protocol, is reliable to accurately identify DZ. We discuss how PLM and BSE-SEM that measure different features of the bone tissue can converge on the identification of DZ.

Modeling and remodeling responses to normal loading in the human lower limb.

Limb bones are designed to be strong enough to support the body and yet be energetically conservative during locomotion. Bones of the distal segment, which are relatively costly to move, are often more slender than bones of the proximal segments, even though they must sustain proportionally greater loads. As a result, they are expected to experience a higher incidence of microdamage. With this constraint in mind, Lieberman and Crompton (1998 Principles of Animal Design, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 78-86) proposed that bones response to strain varies along the proximo-distal axis of the limb. In order to avoid fatigue fractures due to the accumulation of microdamage, the distal segment, in comparison to the proximal segment, will have an increase in remodeling events to replace damaged bone. In this paper, we test the hypothesis of Lieberman and Crompton (1998) with respect to the human lower limb. With a sample of adult individuals, we compare tibiae and femora for mid-diaphyseal cross-sectional geometry and Haversian remodeling differences. Our results indicate that the human limb is not designed like that of quadrupedal cursorial animals. The tibia is not less resistant in bending and torsion, and does not remodel more than the femur. Our findings fail to support the hypothesis of Lieberman and Crompton (1998) and suggest, instead, that the human lower limb is not designed like a cursorial animal limb. In addition, our results support previous observations that remodeling is not uniform within the cross section of a bone, probably a reflection of different loading histories within the different regions of the cross section.

Population-specific histological age-estimating method: a model for known African-American and European-American skeletal remains.

Previously developed histological age-estimating methods have been based on samples lacking interpopulation variability. A comparison of age-associated rib histomorphometrics between an European-American sample and an African-American sample indicates that ethnicity can have a significant effect on osteon population density (OPD), osteon cross-sectional area (On.Ar), and relative cortical area (Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar). Based upon these findings, new histological age-predicting formulae are presented that are recommended when estimating age for African-American or European-American skeletal remains. A general formula that is applicable to remains of unknown ethnicity is also provided.