Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 34(10): 2097-102, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26219682

RESUMO

Rapid detection of microorganisms in respiratory specimens is of paramount importance to drive the proper antibiotic regimen to prevent complications and transmission of infections. In the present study, the respiFISH® HAP Gram (-) Panel (miacom diagnostics GmbH, Duesseldorf, Germany) for the etiological diagnosis of hospital-acquired pneumonia was compared with the traditional culture method for the detection of major Gram-negative pathogens in respiratory specimens. respiFISH® combined the classical fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technology with fluorescence-labeled DNA molecular beacons as probes. From September 2011 to January 2012, 165 samples were analyzed: the sensitivity and specificity were 94.39 and 87.93%, respectively. Only six pathogens (3.6%) were not identified with respiFISH®, while seven specimens (3%) provided false-positive results. This beacon-based identification shortens the time to result by at least one work day, providing species-level identification within half an hour. Considering the high sensitivity and specificity and the significant time saving, the introduction of bbFISH® assays could effectively complement traditional systems in microbiology laboratories.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Cultura , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/classificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/diagnóstico , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Pneumonia/microbiologia , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 34(2): 357-65, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25217227

RESUMO

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are an increasing problem in intensive care units (ICUs), and conventional diagnostic methods are not always reliable or timely enough to deliver appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The dosage of fungal antigens in serum is a promising diagnostic technique, but several confounding factors, such as treatment with immunoglobulins (Ig), albumin, or antifungals, could interfere with the correct interpretation of the (1,3)-beta-D-glucan (BG) assay. This study assessed the reliability of the BG assay and the influence of timing and dosage of major confounding factors on circulating levels of IFI biomarkers. 267 ICU patients who underwent a BG assay were retrospectively studied. The timing and dosage of albumin, use of azole treatment, and infusions of intravenous IgG, red blood cells, concentrated platelets, and frozen plasma were analyzed to find possible correlations with the BG results. The sensitivity and specificity of the BG assay were calculated. The BG test in serum showed high sensitivity (82.9 %) but low specificity (56.7 %). The optimal cut-off for the test was 95.9 pg/mL. The mean BG level in proven invasive candidiasis was around 400 pg/mL. The only factor that was found to significantly confound (p < 0.05) the diagnostic performance of the BG assay was the administration of more than 30 g of albumin within 2 days prior to BG testing. The BG assay remains a useful diagnostic test in ICU patients and the levels of BG are useful in evaluating the positive predictive value of this biomarker. The only confounding factor in our study was the use of albumin.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Fungos/sangue , Candida/imunologia , Candidíase Invasiva/diagnóstico , beta-Glucanas/sangue , Idoso , Antifúngicos/sangue , Candida/isolamento & purificação , Candidíase Invasiva/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas/sangue , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Proteoglicanas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Albumina Sérica
3.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 24(3 Suppl): S27-34, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22014923

RESUMO

Perioperative anaphylactic as well as anaphylactoid reactions can be elicited by drugs, diagnostic agents, antiseptics, disinfectants and latex. In some individuals, allergic reactions occur in the absence of any evident risk factor. Previous history of specific safe exposure to a product does not permit to exclude the risk of having a reaction. We have systematically reviewed characteristics in the patient's history or clinical parameters that affect the risk of developing reactions during anesthesia. Evidence shows that patients with previous unexplained reaction during anesthesia are at risk for perioperative allergic reactions. An allergic reaction to an agent is associated with previous reaction to a product that is related with the culprit agent. Multiple surgery procedures, professional exposure to latex and allergy to fruit are associated with an increased frequency of latex allergy. It has been shown that in some instances, allergic perioperative reactions may be more common in atopic patients and in females.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Período Perioperatório/estatística & dados numéricos , Anafilaxia , Corantes/efeitos adversos , Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Imediata , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
4.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 24(3 Suppl): S91-9, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22014931

RESUMO

Hypersensitivity reactions during perioperative period are increasing and may be potentially life-threatening. Therefore, major emphasis is given to prevention. We perform a review to examine which measures should be taken to prevent reactions to products used in elective and emergency surgery. Any patient with a history of previous anaphylaxis or severe reaction during anaesthesia should be referred to allergist for detection of the offending compound. However, the identification of the triggering agent is not always feasible because of the low accuracy of diagnostic tests. In these cases and when emergency surgery is required, it should be considered to replace all drugs administered before the onset of the reaction with alternatives. Furthermore, any cross-reacting agent and latex, especially in patients belonging to populations at-risk for latex allergy should be avoided. In susceptible patients, premedication with antihistamines and corticosteroids might reduce the severity of reaction to drugs or contrast material while it is unclear whether pre-treatment decreases incidence of anaphylactic reactions. There is no evidence that premedication prevents allergic reactions to latex. Overall, physicians should not rely on the efficacy of premedication.


Assuntos
Anestesia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/prevenção & controle , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/imunologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/análise , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/prevenção & controle , Período Perioperatório , Pré-Medicação
5.
J Food Sci ; 72(8): E470-5, 2007 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17995607

RESUMO

Vacuum impregnation (VI) is a food processing method by which air and native solution are removed from porous spaces within a food and replaced by an external solution. In this study, an experimental device based on a previous design was built, including some modifications, in order to investigate the dynamics of the VI process. The device measured the net force exerted by a food sample submitted to the VI process using a load cell. The influence of the vacuum level and sample geometry was well quantified by the experimental procedure and the modified equipment using apple samples (Fuji var.) as a food model. The results indicated that the experimental device proposed in this study, together with the suggested procedure, is a useful tool to investigate the dynamics of VI processes. It is robust and versatile, and has the advantage of not requiring the determination of the water evaporated during the VI process in a separate experiment, which represents an increase in the accuracy of the results.


Assuntos
Manipulação de Alimentos/métodos , Embalagem de Alimentos/métodos , Conservação de Alimentos/métodos , Malus , Comportamento do Consumidor , Humanos , Controle de Qualidade , Vácuo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...