The safety profile of nefazodone.

Comprehensive review of safety data from approximately 3500 patients who received nefazodone in premarketing clinical trials demonstrates the drug to be very well tolerated, with a favorable side effect profile compared with other antidepressant drugs. Nefazodone treatment was associated with fewer side effects than were the control drugs. The incidence of side effects was generally low, and treatment discontinuations for adverse effects were less frequent with nefazodone than with imipramine and comparable with fluoxetine. No late-appearing side effects or toxicity emerged during the long-term treatment (1 year or longer) of several hundred patients. There were no drug-related fatalities and no evidence that nefazodone caused specific organ toxicity, although some cardiovascular side effects were noted (e.g., asymptomatic reduced systolic blood pressure, asymptomatic sinus bradycardia). Experience in 488 elderly patients treated with nefazodone yielded no evidence of increased susceptibility of older patients to nefazodone-associated adverse experiences, including those pertaining to the cardiovascular system. However, treatment should be initiated at a reduced dose in elderly patients because of reduced hepatic clearance of nefazodone in this age group. Final dose range may be similar in healthy younger and older patients. Although nefazodone may interact with some other medications (e.g., increases at steady state in AUC: alprazolam, twofold; triazolam, fourfold), drug-drug interactions involving patients have been clinically minor. On the basis of the inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme by nefazodone in vitro, coadministration of terfenadine or astemizole with nefazodone is contraindicated because nefazodone can increase the plasma levels of these two drugs. Extensive clinical experience provides substantial evidence that nefazodone is an extremely safe and effective treatment for depression, with important advantages over existing therapies. Therapeutic benefits include a low incidence of clinically troublesome side effects and lack of unwanted psychic activation, sexual dysfunction, weight change, and the cardiotoxicity of other antidepressants.

Gepirone treatment of atypical depression: preliminary evidence of serotonergic involvement.

This is a report of a controlled trial of gepirone, a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT1A) partial agonist azapirone related to buspirone, in the treatment of atypical depression. The azapirones are of particular interest because their highly selective actions on the serotonergic system may possibly make them useful pharmacologic probes and potentially selective therapeutic agents. Sixty outpatients meeting Columbia criteria for definite or probable atypical depression were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 8-week clinical trial at a single site. The dosage schedule was fixed flexible, with 10-mg capsules given on a thrice-daily schedule, with doses of up to 120 mg daily. The response rate at 8 weeks for the intention-to-treat sample analyzed with the last observation carried forward was 62% (18 of 29 patients) for gepirone and 20% (6 of 30 patients) for placebo (chi 2 = 9.1; df = 1; p < 0.001). Robust and consistent drug-placebo differences are seen across virtually all rating scales post-treatment. The effect of gepirone was consistent across the levels of concomitant variables, including duration of episode and presence of dysthymia or panic. Gepirone is a novel antidepressant that holds promise for the treatment of atypical depression and that may be of heuristic value because of its relatively specific actions on the serotonergic system.

Use of buspirone in patients with generalized anxiety disorder and coexisting depressive symptoms. A meta-analysis of eight randomized, controlled studies.

This report presents the results of a retrospective analysis of pooled efficacy data from eight studies in which buspirone was compared to placebo in 520 patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). In addition to evaluating overall efficacy in the composite patient data base, four criteria were used to identify subsets of patients with GAD who had coexisting depressive symptoms of at least moderate intensity: (1) a score of > or = 2 on the Hamilton Anxiety (HAM-A) Rating Scale item 6 (depressed mood), (2) a score of > or = 2 on the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) Rating Scale item 1 (depressed mood), (3) a HAM-D total score of > or = 18, or (4) a HAM-D Retardation Factor value (items 1, 7, 8, and 14) greater than the median for the group. Overall, patients treated with buspirone demonstrated significant (p < or = 0.001) improvement over baseline in total HAM-A scores compared to patients who received placebo. Buspirone also produced significant (p < or = 0.001) global improvement compared to placebo as assessed by the attending physician. Of the GAD patients stratified according to the four criteria for coexisting depressive symptoms, a substantial percentage (44-64%) of the total patient sample exhibited significant depressive symptoms as part of their anxiety disorder. Patients with GAD and coexisting depressive symptoms of at least moderate intensity exhibited significantly greater improvement with buspirone compared to placebo treatment regardless of the stratification criterion used. They also responded at least as well or better to buspirone therapy as did those with GAD who had less intense depressive symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)