Sequence and functional differences in the ATPase domains of CHD3 and SNF2H promise potential for selective regulability and drugability.

Chromatin remodelers use the energy of ATP hydrolysis to regulate chromatin dynamics. Their impact for development and disease requires strict enzymatic control. Here, we address the differential regulability of the ATPase domain of hSNF2H and hCHD3, exhibiting similar substrate affinities and enzymatic activities. Both enzymes are comparably strongly inhibited in their ATP hydrolysis activity by the competitive ATPase inhibitor ADP. However, the nucleosome remodeling activity of SNF2H is more strongly affected than that of CHD3. Beside ADP, also IP6 inhibits the nucleosome translocation of both enzymes to varying degrees, following a competitive inhibition mode at CHD3, but not at SNF2H. Our observations are further substantiated by mutating conserved Q- and K-residues of ATPase domain motifs. The variants still bind both substrates and exhibit a wild-type similar, basal ATP hydrolysis. Apart from three CHD3 variants, none of the variants can translocate nucleosomes, suggesting for the first time that the basal ATPase activity of CHD3 is sufficient for nucleosome remodeling. Together with the ADP data, our results propose a more efficient coupling of ATP hydrolysis and remodeling in CHD3. This aspect correlates with findings that CHD3 nucleosome translocation is visible at much lower ATP concentrations than SNF2H. We propose sequence differences between the ATPase domains of both enzymes as an explanation for the functional differences and suggest that aa interactions, including the conserved Q- and K-residues distinctly regulate ATPase-dependent functions of both proteins. Our data emphasize the benefits of remodeler ATPase domains for selective drugability and/or regulability of chromatin dynamics.

Elucidation of the functional roles of the Q and I motifs in the human chromatin-remodeling enzyme BRG1.

The Snf2 proteins, comprising 53 different enzymes in humans, belong to the SF2 family. Many Snf2 enzymes possess chromatin-remodeling activity, requiring a functional ATPase domain consisting of conserved motifs named Q and I-VII. These motifs form two recA-like domains, creating an ATP-binding pocket. Little is known about the function of the conserved motifs in chromatin-remodeling enzymes. Here, we characterized the function of the Q and I (Walker I) motifs in hBRG1 (SMARCA4). The motifs are in close proximity to the bound ATP, suggesting a role in nucleotide binding and/or hydrolysis. Unexpectedly, when substituting the conserved residues Gln758 (Q motif) or Lys785 (I motif) of both motifs, all variants still bound ATP and exhibited basal ATPase activity similar to that of wildtype BRG1 (wtBRG1). However, all mutants lost the nucleosome-dependent stimulation of the ATPase domain. Their chromatin-remodeling rates were impaired accordingly, but nucleosome binding was retained and still comparable with that of wtBRG1. Interestingly, a cancer-relevant substitution, L754F (Q motif), displayed defects similar to the Gln758 variant(s), arguing for a comparable loss of function. Because we excluded a mutual interference of ATP and nucleosome binding, we postulate that both motifs stimulate the ATPase and chromatin-remodeling activities upon binding of BRG1 to nucleosomes, probably via allosteric mechanisms. Furthermore, mutations of both motifs similarly affect the enzymatic functionality of BRG1 in vitro and in living cells. Of note, in BRG1-deficient H1299 cells, exogenously expressed wtBRG1, but not BRG1 Q758A and BRG1 K785R, exhibited a tumor suppressor-like function.