A look to the past, directions for the future.

This article represents the history of primary care and behavioral health integration at Group Health Cooperative (GHC) over the last decade, and foreshadows probable futures for this work into the next decade. To build from a logical progression, the article responds to a series of questions: 1. Why integrate primary care and behavioral health? 2. What has been done so far and how well has it worked? 3. Keeping the end in mind, what's the idealized picture of integration for the future? 4. How to get from here to there? What will help or hinder the effort? and 5. Again, why make these efforts to integrate?

Experimental avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment.

Syndromal classification is a well-developed diagnostic system but has failed to deliver on its promise of the identification of functional pathological processes. Functional analysis is tightly connected to treatment but has failed to develop testable, replicable classification systems. Functional diagnostic dimensions are suggested as a way to develop the functional classification approach, and experiential avoidance is described as 1 such dimension. A wide range of research is reviewed showing that many forms of psychopathology can be conceptualized as unhealthy efforts to escape and avoid emotions, thoughts, memories, and other private experiences. It is argued that experiential avoidance, as a functional diagnostic dimension, has the potential to integrate the efforts and findings of researchers from a wide variety of theoretical paradigms, research interests, and clinical domains and to lead to testable new approaches to the analysis and treatment of behavioral disorders.

Mind and body primary mental healthcare: new model for integrated services.

Primary mental healthcare is different from consultation-liaison psychiatry and behavioral medicine yet has elements of both. This approach calls for complete integration of behavioral health services within the primary care and general medical setting. Primary care providers, rather than mental health specialists, retain direction of patient care. In this model, developed at the Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, primary behavioral health clinicians are on site, not on call.

Quality and customers: Type 2 change in mental health delivery within health care reform.

The traditional separation of mental health and medical programs is problematic because mental health issues are inseparable from the larger medical system. By contrast, a collaborative primary care model of mental health care, augmented and supported by secondary specialty mental health services, has the potential to optimize quality and cost goals while reinforcing health care reform principles. The flexibility of mental health treatment in this delivery structure provides opportunities to customize services according to patient and purchaser expectations.

New dimensions in behavioral health/primary care integration.

The case is made for the integration of primary care and behavioral health services in the HMO. Key features of a successfully integrated behavioral health service are offered, along with brief reports of integration efforts at a number of HMOs across the United States. The author believes that better value and cost efficiencies result from integration.

Quality and customers: a planning approach to the future of mental health services in a health maintenance organization.

Mental health service delivery is both a health care and business arrangement, and is accordingly impacted by national changes in both areas. HMO mental health services in the current health reform zeitgeist are being called on to provide more efficient, comprehensive integrated care. A planning effort is presented which is organized around (1) a quality improvement effort aimed at understanding who are the "customers" (patient, medical community, mental health staff, and client employer) and what they need and (2) coordination and integration with the HMO larger organizational plan and efforts. The unique benefits of staff model HMOs are discussed relative to mental health service.

Prediction of suicide intent in hospitalized parasuicides: reasons for living, hopelessness, and depression.

This study examined the risk prediction efficiency of the Reasons for Living Inventory Survival and Coping Beliefs Scale, Beck Hopelessness Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, and the Life Experiences Survey with a sample of 51 newly hospitalized parasuicides. The index of suicidal potential chosen for this study was suicide intent as measured by Beck's Suicide Intent Scale. Regression analyses indicated that the Survival and Coping Beliefs Scale emerged as the single most important predictor of suicide intent. Hopelessness and depression made secondary and nonsignificant contributions. Hopelessness was a significant predictor of suicide intent when analyzed apart from Survival and Coping Beliefs, but not among a subsample of 43 repeat parasuicides. Classification analyses showed that neither hopelessness nor survival and coping beliefs were accurate at classifying low- or high-intent parasuicides. Factors contributing to the efficacy of survival and coping beliefs as a risk prediction index are discussed, as is the false-negative dilemma in suicide risk assessment and prediction.

Depression, hopelessness, and suicidal behavior in Chinese and American psychiatric patients.

The authors compared 37 patients in the People's Republic of China and 46 patients in the United States who were having difficulty with suicidal thinking or behavior. Hopelessness, reasons for living, and suicidal efficacy showed none of the expected relationships with suicidal intent among the Chinese patients, but the two groups were similar on many variables theoretically related to suicidality. Chinese patients were less likely to communicate suicidal intent and rated suicide as less effective at solving problems. The authors examine such variations in the light of possibly different cultural approaches to suicidal behavior.

The 24 hours before hospitalization: factors related to suicide attempting.

Fifty-nine psychiatric inpatients were interviewed concerning the psychological and environmental events that occurred in the 24 hours prior to their hospitalization. Independent raters then performed a content evaluation of these accounts, allowing for comparisons among patients admitted for a suicide attempt, suicide ideation, or non-suicide-related complaints. Results showed that suicide attempters were more likely to have used alcohol or marijuana and less likely to have contacted a health care professional than suicide ideators, even when past history of suicide behavior was controlled for. Suicide ideators were more likely to have contacted a mental health professional. Implications for suicide risk assessment and intervention are discussed.

Modeling effects on suicidal behavior.

Knowledge of suicidal behavior, i.e., psychiatric patients indicating that they have an acquaintance or relative who has attempted or committed suicide, has been cited as a risk factor in the assessment of suicide potential. The authors evaluated psychiatric patients hospitalized for a suicide attempt (N = 30), serious suicidal ideation (N = 26), or other non-suicide-related reasons (N = 20) and also a control group of 18 patients admitted for orthopaedic surgery. Information derived from a structured clinical interview revealed that suicide attempters have fewer suicidal models than individuals in the other patient groups, and they are more interpersonally distant from the models they do know. Depression level was not positively related to the recall and reporting of suicidal models. Measures assessing suicide-related beliefs revealed that suicide attempters rated suicide as an effective solution for problems to a greater extent that did patients in the remaining three groups. The implications of these results for social learning models of suicidal behavior are discussed.

Diseases from fish and shellfish ingestion.

Fish- and shellfish-acquired diseases are a common but often unrecognized group of food-borne illnesses with considerable epidemiologic importance. They present with a spectrum of gastrointestinal and neurologic symptoms, but the history of pertinent ingestion establishes the diagnosis. Treatment is generally supportive, and recovery with minimal or no residua is the rule. State and local health authorities should be notified of all suspected cases because of the frequent occurrence of multiple cases from one source.