Perinatal influences on the development of asthma and atopy in childhood.

BACKGROUND: In most children with asthma and atopy, onset of disease occurs early in life, indicating a crucial role of in utero and early childhood environment. However, only a small part of this burden of disease established early in life has been explained. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of early environmental exposures on the development of asthma and atopy within the setting of an affluent urban population. METHODS: The authors followed 526 German children from birth to 5 years of age. Parental interviews in pregnancy and then yearly assessed the health of the child and environmental characteristics. Endotoxin and allergens in house dust were measured at 3 months. Atopic sensitization was assessed at 1 and 5 years. RESULTS: In atopic mothers, acute atopic symptoms during pregnancy were associated with increased risk of early atopic dermatitis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-3.02) and allergic rhinitis at 5 years (aOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.01-4.41). Further, maternal illnesses during pregnancy (ie, repeated common colds) increased the risk of asthma at 5 years (aOR 2.31, 95% CI 1.12-4.78). Endotoxin in the child's mattress was inversely associated with atopic sensitization (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97) and asthma (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.93). A contrasting effect of early endotoxin and mite exposure was observed for mite sensitization: mite exposure increased the risk of mite sensitization at 5 years (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.11-1.53), whereas endotoxin exposure was inversely associated with mite sensitization (aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.95). CONCLUSION: Factors affecting the in utero environment, such as maternal atopy and infections, and bacterial exposure in pregnancy or early life may act as immunomodulators enhancing or inhibiting the development of asthma and atopy in childhood.

Protection from childhood asthma and allergy in Alpine farm environments-the GABRIEL Advanced Studies.

BACKGROUND: Studies on the association of farm environments with asthma and atopy have repeatedly observed a protective effect of farming. However, no single specific farm-related exposure explaining this protective farm effect has consistently been identified. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine distinct farm exposures that account for the protective effect of farming on asthma and atopy. METHODS: In rural regions of Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, 79,888 school-aged children answered a recruiting questionnaire (phase I). In phase II a stratified random subsample of 8,419 children answered a detailed questionnaire on farming environment. Blood samples and specific IgE levels were available for 7,682 of these children. A broad asthma definition was used, comprising symptoms, diagnosis, or treatment ever. RESULTS: Children living on a farm were at significantly reduced risk of asthma (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.59-0.78; P< .001), hay fever (aOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.36-0.52; P< .001), atopic dermatitis (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93; P= .004), and atopic sensitization (aOR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.48-0.61; P< .001) compared with nonfarm children. Whereas this overall farm effect could be explained by specific exposures to cows, straw, and farm milk for asthma and exposure to fodder storage rooms and manure for atopic dermatitis, the farm effect on hay fever and atopic sensitization could not be completely explained by the questionnaire items themselves or their diversity. CONCLUSION: A specific type of farm typical for traditional farming (ie, with cows and cultivation) was protective against asthma, hay fever, and atopy. However, whereas the farm effect on asthma could be explained by specific farm characteristics, there is a link still missing for hay fever and atopy.

The GABRIEL Advanced Surveys: study design, participation and evaluation of bias.

Exposure to farming environments has been shown to protect substantially against asthma and atopic disease across Europe and in other parts of the world. The GABRIEL Advanced Surveys (GABRIELA) were conducted to determine factors in farming environments which are fundamental to protecting against asthma and atopic disease. The GABRIEL Advanced Surveys have a multi-phase stratified design. In a first-screening phase, a comprehensive population-based survey was conducted to assess the prevalence of exposure to farming environments and of asthma and atopic diseases (n = 103,219). The second phase was designed to ascertain detailed exposure to farming environments and to collect biomaterial and environmental samples in a stratified random sample of phase 1 participants (n = 15,255). A third phase was carried out in a further stratified sample only in Bavaria, southern Germany, aiming at in-depth respiratory disease and exposure assessment including extensive environmental sampling (n = 895). Participation rates in phase 1 were around 60% but only about half of the participating study population consented to further study modules in phase 2. We found that consenting behaviour was related to familial allergies, high parental education, wheeze, doctor diagnosed asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis, and to a lesser extent to exposure to farming environments. The association of exposure to farm environments with asthma or rhinoconjunctivitis was not biased by participation or consenting behaviour. The GABRIEL Advanced Surveys are one of the largest studies to shed light on the protective 'farm effect' on asthma and atopic disease. Bias with regard to the main study question was able to be ruled out by representativeness and high participation rates in phases 2 and 3. The GABRIEL Advanced Surveys have created extensive collections of questionnaire data, biomaterial and environmental samples promising new insights into this area of research.

The association of psychosocial factors with nausea and vomiting during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify predictors for nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (NVP). STUDY DESIGN: A large German health insurance company provided data on prescription reimbursements and socio-demographics for all women giving birth between June 2000 and May 2001. The prescribed drugs were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code. The data was linked to the database of the Bavarian Perinatal Study in psychosocial variables as possible predictors of NVP. RESULTS: The risk of developing NVP was two times higher for non-smokers than for smokers (OR=2.03 KI [1.02-4.05]) and dropped about 3% (OR=0.97 KI [0.94-0.99]) with every year of age. Being single raised the risk of NVP by about 50% (OR=1.49 KI [1.24-1.79]) compared to women who lived with a partner, and among these women living alone, working lowered the adjusted risk about two thirds (OR=0.34 KI [0.24-0.49]) compared to women who did not work. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial variables have a clear influence on nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. Physicians should be aware of this fact when seeing women asking for treatment.

Antibiotics in pregnancy: analysis of potential risks and determinants in a large German statutory sickness fund population.

PURPOSE: Antibiotics are frequently prescribed drugs in pregnancy. The purpose of the study was to analyse the use, the potential risks and the determinants of systemic antibiotic prescriptions during pregnancy. METHODS: A large, nation-wide acting German statutory sickness fund provided prescription data and personal data of 41,293 pregnant women. For this study, all prescriptions of systemic antibiotics (ATC: J01) dispensed to each woman during a 21-month period were analysed. We used the FDA risk classification system and enrolled a literature search to identify potentially harmful antibiotics. To investigate the impact of geographical and socio-economic determinants in antibiotic prescribing, a multivariate logistic regression model was performed. RESULTS: Of the 41,293 women, 19.7% received at least one antibiotic drug during pregnancy. There was a shift to relatively safe and reduced antibiotic drug use during pregnancy. Prescribing of contraindicated antibactericals or potentially harmful drugs was seen in 521 women (1.3% of all women). In the logistic regression, being younger than 21 years (adjusted OR 2.14, 95%CI 1.80-2.53) or being welfare recipient (adjusted OR 1.57, CI 1.25-2.00) was strongly associated with higher antibiotic use. Significantly lower antibiotic use was seen in 5 of 16 German federal states (OR 0.74-0.83). CONCLUSIONS: About 20% of pregnant women received antibiotics, and 1.3% received a harmful drug. To minimise the risks, detailed guidelines are needed for the antibiotic treatment during pregnancy.