A review of impact testing methods for headgear in sports: Considerations for improved prevention of head injury through research and standards.

Standards for sports headgear were introduced as far back as the 1960s and many have remained substantially unchanged to present day. Since this time, headgear has virtually eliminated catastrophic head injuries such as skull fractures and changed the landscape of head injuries in sports. Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is now a prevalent concern and the effectiveness of headgear in mitigating mTBI is inconclusive for most sports. Given that most current headgear standards are confined to attenuating linear head mechanics and recent brain injury studies have underscored the importance of angular mechanics in the genesis of mTBI, new or expanded standards are needed to foster headgear development and assess headgear performance that addresses all types of sport-related head and brain injuries. The aim of this review is to provide a basis for developing new sports headgear impact tests for standards by summarizing and critiquing: 1) impact testing procedures currently codified in published headgear standards for sports and 2) new or proposed headgear impact test procedures in published literature and/or relevant conferences. Research areas identified as needing further knowledge to support standards test development include defining sports-specific head impact conditions, establishing injury and age appropriate headgear assessment criteria, and the development of headgear specific head and neck surrogates for at-risk populations.

Bicycle helmets are highly effective at preventing head injury during head impact: head-form accelerations and injury criteria for helmeted and unhelmeted impacts.

Cycling is a popular form of recreation and method of commuting with clear health benefits. However, cycling is not without risk. In Canada, cycling injuries are more common than in any other summer sport; and according to the US National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration, 52,000 cyclists were injured in the US in 2010. Head injuries account for approximately two-thirds of hospital admissions and three-quarters of fatal injuries among injured cyclists. In many jurisdictions and across all age levels, helmets have been adopted to mitigate risk of serious head injuries among cyclists and the majority of epidemiological literature suggests that helmets effectively reduce risk of injury. Critics have raised questions over the actual efficacy of helmets by pointing to weaknesses in existing helmet epidemiology including selection bias and lack of appropriate control for the type of impact sustained by the cyclist and the severity of the head impact. These criticisms demonstrate the difficulty in conducting epidemiology studies that will be regarded as definitive and the need for complementary biomechanical studies where confounding factors can be adequately controlled. In the bicycle helmet context, there is a paucity of biomechanical data comparing helmeted to unhelmeted head impacts and, to our knowledge, there is no data of this type available with contemporary helmets. In this research, our objective was to perform biomechanical testing of paired helmeted and unhelmeted head impacts using a validated anthropomorphic test headform and a range of drop heights between 0.5m and 3.0m, while measuring headform acceleration and Head Injury Criterion (HIC). In the 2m (6.3m/s) drops, the middle of our drop height range, the helmet reduced peak accelerations from 824g (unhelmeted) to 181g (helmeted) and HIC was reduced from 9667 (unhelmeted) to 1250 (helmeted). At realistic impact speeds of 5.4m/s (1.5m drop) and 6.3m/s (2.0m drop), bicycle helmets changed the probability of severe brain injury from extremely likely (99.9% risk at both 5.4 and 6.3m/s) to unlikely (9.3% and 30.6% risk at 1.5m and 2.0m drops respectively). These biomechanical results for acceleration and HIC, and the corresponding results for reduced risk of severe brain injury show that contemporary bicycle helmets are highly effective at reducing head injury metrics and the risk for severe brain injury in head impacts characteristic of bicycle crashes.

Changes in gastrointestinal morphology associated with obstructive jaundice.

Bacterial translocation has been consistently demonstrated in experimental models of obstructive jaundice. An important factor which promotes this phenomenon is physical injury of the intestinal mucosa. Some previous studies have presented suggestive evidence of this, following bile duct ligation. The aims of this study were to analyse objectively intestinal mucosal morphometric characteristics, to examine for evidence of bacterial translocation, and to assess enterocytes for ultrastructural abnormalities. Adult female Wistar rats were assigned to one of three groups: control (n=8), bile duct ligation (BDL; n=11), or sham operation (n=10). One week later, portal blood, mesenteric lymph nodes, liver, and spleen were harvested and cultured aerobically and anaerobically for evidence of bacterial translocation. Segments of jejunum, ileum, caecum, and large bowel were examined histologically, using light microscopy and morphometrically, using an image analysis system. Electron microscopy was performed on regions of the gastrointestinal tract where significant morphometric alterations had been identified. Significant bacterial translocation was identified following BDL (63. 6% BDL vs. 0% sham vs. 0% control, p<0.01, Fisher's exact test). There was a significant reduction in total mucosal thickness (standard error) [650 microm (23) BDL vs. 731 microm (27) sham vs. 744 microm (95) control] and villous height [451 microm (20) BDL vs. 515 microm (18) sham vs. 559 microm (79) control] in jaundiced animals, compared with sham-operated and control animals (p<0.02, Mann-Whitney U-test). Electron microscopy revealed oedematous change associated with mild inflammation, disruption of desmosomes, and the formation of lateral spaces between enterocytes. In addition, enterocytes showed vacuolation of their cytoplasm and mitochondrial swelling. Increased numbers of bacteria appeared to be attached to the mucosa. These data provide evidence of physical disruption of intestinal mucosa in jaundiced animals, most marked in the distal ileum. Significant bacterial translocation occurs following bile duct ligation and this supports the hypothesis of gut barrier dysfunction with obstructive jaundice.