[Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum: osteosynthesis]. / Periprothetische Frakturen des Acetabulums: Osteosynthese.

In most cases periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum are complex injuries and are extremely challenging for the treating medical team. Over the years the frequency of this overall rare entity has increased due to demographic changes. In recent years several treatment algorithms were published and provided the possibility of developing standardized treatment concepts. The classification of the fractures and a dedicated preoperative strategy are highly important for the quality of patient-centered care. In the literature the frequency of intraoperative fractures was initially given as 0.4%; however, several studies have been published in which a far higher rate of intraoperative fractures was detected by computed tomography (CT), often referred to as so-called occult fractures. The causes are multifactorial and there is significant association with whether cement-free press-fit acetabular cups were used or cemented forms. In approximately 75% of the cases a low energy impact was the cause of the fracture. In these patients systemic processes, such as osteoporotic alterations of the bony substance or the possible presence of low-grade infections should be considered. This article gives an overview of the diagnostics, planning, challenges and osteosynthetic treatment options for periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum.

Balloon Guided Cement Augmentation of Iliosacral Screws in the Treatment of Insufficiency Fractures of the Sacrum - Description of a New Method and Preliminary Results.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Fragility fractures of the pelvic ring in the elderly population are a serious problem in orthopaedics. The treatment options range from conservative treatment to diverse operative options. We present a balloon guided new technique of implanting cement augmented screws aiming at improved implant anchorage and reduced cement leakage. MATERIAL AND METHODS We describe a new technique of balloon- guided cement augmented iliosacral screws. After the balloon has been insufflated and contrast medium has been instillated for leakage detection, iliosacral screws can safely be placed with a relevant cement depot. RESULTS All patients (n = 8) treated in this way were allowed to weight bear on both legs and mobilisation was tolerated the next day after surgery. In the post-operative controls including X-ray and CT scan we noticed no cement leakage. Pain level as measured by the visual analog scale was significantly reduced to pre- surgery (mean 7.6 pre-operatively, mean 2.5 postoperatively). In addition pain medication could be reduced gradually soon after surgery. CONCLUSIONS The described procedure to address fragility fractures of the pelvic ring is a safe and easy to handle method. There are three advantages: First the osteoporotic S1 vertebral body can by stabilised by the amount of cement; second the cement leakage can be prevented by the balloon-compaction of the cancellous bone and the possibility to control the created cavity with contrast medium; third the bone - screw interface is much stronger compared to other procedures and is biomechanically superior against vertical shear stress. In contrast to sacroplasty, the cement application is guided by the previous use of a balloon. Key words:pelvic ring, fragility fracture, osteoporosis, elderly.

[Influence of the pelvic trauma registry of the DGU on treatment of pelvic ring fractures]. / Einfluss des Beckenregisters der DGU auf die Versorgung von Beckenringfrakturen.

Fractures of the pelvic ring are comparatively rare with an incidence of 2-8 % of all fractures depending on the study in question. The severity of pelvic ring fractures can be very different ranging from simple and mostly "harmless" type A fractures up to life-threatening complex type C fractures. Although it was previously postulated that high-energy trauma was necessary to induce a pelvic ring fracture, over the past decades it became more and more evident, not least from data in the pelvic trauma registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU), that low-energy minor trauma can also cause pelvic ring fractures of osteoporotic bone and in a rapidly increasing population of geriatric patients insufficiency fractures of the pelvic ring are nowadays observed with no preceding trauma.Even in large trauma centers the number of patients with pelvic ring fractures is mostly insufficient to perform valid and sufficiently powerful monocentric studies on epidemiological, diagnostic or therapeutic issues. For this reason, in 1991 the first and still the only registry worldwide for the documentation and evaluation of pelvic ring fractures was introduced by the Working Group Pelvis (AG Becken) of the DGU. Originally, the main objectives of the documentation were epidemiological and diagnostic issues; however, in the course of time it developed into an increasingly expanding dataset with comprehensive parameters on injury patterns, operative and conservative therapy regimens and short-term and long-term outcome of patients. Originally starting with 10 institutions, in the meantime more than 30 hospitals in Germany and other European countries participate in the documentation of data. In the third phase of the registry alone, which was started in 2004, data from approximately 15,000 patients with pelvic ring and acetabular fractures were documented. In addition to the scientific impact of the pelvic trauma registry, which is reflected in the numerous national and international publications, the dramatically changing epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures, further developments in diagnostics and the changes in operative procedures over time could be demonstrated. Last but not least the now well-established diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms for pelvic ring fractures, which could be derived from the information collated in registry studies, reflect the clinical impact of the registry.

[Pearls and pitfalls for the treatment of tibial head fractures]. / Outcome und Komplikationen nach proximalen Tibiafrakturen.

BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures requiring surgery are severe injuries of the lower extremity. Depending on the fracture pattern, the age of the patient, the range of activity and the bone quality there is a broad variation in adequate treatment. In the last decade we have had a tremendous development, might it be the angular stable anatomical plates as well as new approaches to the proximal tibia. Nevertheless in the recent literature there are still many complications reported. Not only for sports professionals, recreational athletes or heavy load workers tibial plateau fractures affect leisure, all day activity and professional life. This article reports the treatment algorithm showing different cases, outlines the pitfalls and explains treatment strategies with a detailed x-ray follow-up. CONCLUSION: After a tibial plateau fracture patients are affected in their sporting activity due to an impaired knee function. Despite a long rehabilitation time and programs, physical activity changes to lower impact sports. Among the usual perioperative complications there are the specific complications of postoperative malalignment, implant infections, osteitis of the tibial head, compartment syndrome, secondary loss of reduction, avascular tibial head necrosis, secondary varus or valgus deformity, post-traumatic arthrosis and lesions of the peroneal nerve. In the literature in up to 43% of the cases complications have been noted. Despite surgery the majority of patients cannot return to their previous level of activity. However, overall about 70% of the patients return to sports after a tibial plateau fracture. For a beneficial outcome a detailed fracture analysis with CT scan and precise planning of the surgical strategies and approaches is mandatory.

[Insufficiency fractures of the pelvic ring]. / Insuffizienzfrakturen des Beckenrings.

The demographic changes in society automatically lead to an increase in specific diseases and injuries in the older generation. Therefore, the proportion of osteoporotic and fatigue fractures increases in total and also the absolute number of insufficiency fractures of the pelvic ring. In younger people pelvic ring fractures are mostly due high speed trauma. In the elderly this often occurs by low energy trauma or even with no trauma which is then designated as insufficiency fracture. The problematic of such fractures is insufficiently covered in the conventional classification. Conventional radiological diagnostics must often be supplemented by slice imaging procedures. The therapy forms must be more closely adapted to the general condition and physical health of the patient than by classical fractures and the substantially reduced sustainability of osteosynthesis in altered bones must be taken into consideration.

[Removal of plates and screws. Tips and tricks for problematic cases]. / Implantatentfernung von Platten und Schrauben. Tipps und Tricks für die problematische Metallentfernung.

BACKGROUND: This overview article addresses the different ways of explanting plates and screws. Once the decision has been taken to remove plates and screws, the situation is resolved by skilled performance of surgical procedures. METHOD: In particular, tips and tricks are offered on how to deal with difficult explantations. In general, implant removal is straightforward and without complications. Special techniques, instruments, tips and tricks are important when implant removal becomes problematic due to screw damage, immovable implants, instrument breakage and suchlike. CONCLUSION: This article describes procedures that will put the surgeon on a direct route to implant removal. Keeping strictly to the pathway will inevitably turn problematic implant removal into a straightforward procedure.

[Refracture of long bones after implant removal. An avoidable complication?]. / Refrakturen nach Entfernung von Osteosynthesematerialien. Eine vermeidbare Komplikation?

Refractures of long bones after implant removal are a rare but serious complication, which in most cases make a reoperation necessary. We analysed our own cases and reviewed the scarce literature on this subject. As a result we found that it is possible to reduce this complication by performing thorough preoperative preparation, observing an adequate interim time between initial osteosynthesis and hardware removal, cautiously exposing the weakened bone to force for a certain time period after implant removal and taking the character of the fracture healing into consideration. It is not possible to entirely eradicate this complication because a lot of patients demand the implant removal even though it is known that demineralisation and residual screw holes both induce a reduction of energy-absorbing capacity and therefore predispose the patient to refracture. In some cases the surgeon should recommend that the implants remain in situ.

[Hardware removal after pelvic ring injury]. / Implantatentfernung nach Beckenringfraktur.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic ring fractures are considered as rare injuries. Minimally invasive sacroiliac screw fixation has been used increasingly in recent years as an operative strategy for the treatment of these injuries, if the dorsal pelvic ring needed to be addressed. Treatment options for the anterior pelvic ring comprise plates, screws or external fixation. METHOD: Based on the limited number of publications on this subject and our own experience with 80 patients who suffered pelvic ring B- or C-type injuries during a period of 8 years we are able to show that the indication for hardware removal in the pelvic ring should be strictly defined. RESULTS: In some cases like external fixation, implant-associated infection, malpositioning, allergic implant reaction, critical soft tissue covering, palpable hardware and consolidated juvenile fractures implant removal is certainly indicated. In patients without symptoms and in patients with trauma-associated symptoms which are not definitely associated with the hardware, the removal should be only indicated after thorough consideration of the risks versus the benefits and additionally by taking the initial injury pattern into account. If despite all these objections the hardware removal has been indicated it should always be considered that hardware removal may be challenging with several possible severe complications.

[Hardware removal after spinal instrumentation]. / Metallentfernung an der Wirbelsäule.

Because of the increasing number of patients with surgically treated injuries of the spine we more often have to answer the question of indication for hardware removal. In the cervical spine and after anterior instrumentations of the thoracic and lumbar spine hardware removal is only indicated as part of the management of postoperative complications. After dorsal instrumentation for fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine, implant-associated discomfort is possible. In addition, in non-fusion procedures there is the risk of implant failure. In these cases the hardware should be removed. If the consolidation of the fracture is in doubt, a preoperative CT scan is useful.

[Humerus shaft fractures]. / Humerusschaftfrakturen.

Fractures of the humerus shaft are a common injury, mainly in younger patients and often coming with other injuries. The strategies of treatment are the conservative therapy, which was favoured till the late 1970s, and the operative therapy, including intramedullary nailing, plate osteosynthesis and external fixation. The initial procedure should be chosen according to the primary soft tissue damage and the existence of radial nerve palsy. The aim of treatment must be a usable extremity with anatomical axis, length and rotation.

[Bone tunnel fixation versus suture anchor: mid- and long-term results after distal biceps tendon rupture]. / Transossäre Refixation versus Fadenankerreinsertion, mittel- bis langfristige Ergebnisse nach distaler Bizepssehnenruptur.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the range of movement, isometric and isokinetic postoperative outcome, Morrey score and heterotropic ossifications after refixation of distal biceps tendon rupture with either suture anchor or bone tunnel fixation. METHODS: 48 patients were surgically treated between 1990 and 2005. Elbow function was investigated isometrically and isokinetically with the CYBEX-NORM. The presence and extent of heterotropic ossifications were assessed by A/P and lateral view X-rays. The Morrey score was used to evaluate the clinical outcome. RESULTS: 13 patients received distal biceps refixation with the bone tunnel method and 35 with suture anchors. The range of motion of the elbow was statistically not significantly different except for pronation, which was slightly but significantly reduced after bone tunnel refixation. Isometric and isokinetic results as well as Morrey scores were statistically not different between the two surgical techniques. Both groups showed excellent postoperative results. CONCLUSION: Bone tunnel and suture anchor techniques are both equal and sufficient methods for the refixation of distal biceps tendon ruptures with excellent clinical and functional postoperative results. The slight but significantly reduced pronation after bone tunnel refixation was clinically not relevant.

[Bone tunnel fixation versus suture anchor: mid- and long-term results after distal biceps tendon rupture]. / Transossäre Refixation versus Fadenankerreinsertion, mittel- bis langfristige Ergebnisse nach distaler Bizepssehnenruptur.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the range of movement, isometric and is okinetic postoperative outcome, Morrey score and heterotropic ossifications after refixation of distal biceps tendon rupture with either suture anchor or bone tunnel fixation. METHODS: 48 patients were surgically treated between 1990 and 2005. Elbow function was investigated isometrically and isokinetically with the CYBEX-NORM. The presence and extent of heterotopic ossifications were assessed by A/P and lateral view X-rays. The Morrey score was used to evaluate the clinical outcome. RESULTS: 13 patients received distal biceps refixation with the bone tunnel method and 35 with suture anchors. The range of motion of the elbow was statistically not significantly different except for pronation, which was slightly but significantly reduced after bone tunnel refixation. Isometric and isokinetic results as well as Morrey scores were statistically not different between the two surgical techniques. Both groups showed excellent postoperative results. CONCLUSION: Bone tunnel and suture anchor techniques are both equal and sufficient methods for the refixation of distal biceps tendon ruptures with excellent clinical and functional postoperative results. The slight but significantly reduced pronation after bone tunnel refixation was clinically not relevant.