Influence of Magnetic Field Strength on Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Parameters in Diffusion MRI of the Calf.

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the dependence of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) parameters measured in the human calf on B0. Methods: Diffusion-weighted image data of eight healthy volunteers were acquired using five b-values (0-600 s/mm2) at rest and after muscle activation at 0.55 and 7 T. The musculus gastrocnemius mediale (GM, activated) was assessed. The perfusion fraction f and diffusion coefficient D were determined using segmented fits. The dependence on field strength was assessed using Student's t-test for paired samples and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A biophysical model built on the three non-exchanging compartments of muscle, venous blood, and arterial blood was used to interpret the data using literature relaxation times. Results: The measured perfusion fraction of the GM was significantly lower at 7 T, both for the baseline measurement and after muscle activation. For 0.55 and 7 T, the mean f values were 7.59% and 3.63% at rest, and 14.03% and 6.92% after activation, respectively. The biophysical model estimations for the mean proton-density-weighted perfusion fraction were 3.37% and 6.50% for the non-activated and activated states, respectively. Conclusions: B0 may have a significant effect on the measured IVIM parameters. The blood relaxation times suggest that 7 T IVIM may be arterial-weighted whereas 0.55 T IVIM may exhibit an approximately equal weighting of arterial and venous blood.

Velocity-compensated intravoxel incoherent motion of the human calf muscle.

PURPOSE: To determine whether intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) describes the blood perfusion in muscles better, assuming pseudo diffusion (Bihan Model 1) or ballistic motion (Bihan Model 2). METHODS: IVIM parameters were measured in 18 healthy subjects with three different diffusion gradient time profiles (bipolar with two diffusion times and one with velocity compensation) and 17 b-values (0-600 s/mm2) at rest and after muscle activation. The diffusion coefficient, perfusion fraction, and pseudo-diffusion coefficient were estimated with a segmented fit in the gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles. RESULTS: Velocity-compensated gradients resulted in a decreased perfusion fraction (6.9% ± 1.4% vs. 4.4% ± 1.3% in the GM after activation) and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (0.069 ± 0.046 mm2/s vs. 0.014 ± 0.006 in the GM after activation) compared to the bipolar gradients with the longer diffusion encoding time. Increased diffusion coefficients, perfusion fractions, and pseudo-diffusion coefficients were observed in the GM after activation for all gradient profiles. However, the increase was significantly smaller for the velocity-compensated gradients. A diffusion time dependence was found for the pseudo-diffusion coefficient in the activated muscle. CONCLUSION: Velocity-compensated diffusion gradients significantly suppress the IVIM effect in the calf muscle, indicating that the ballistic limit is mostly reached, which is supported by the time dependence of the pseudo-diffusion coefficient.

Influence of saturation effects on biexponential liver intravoxel incoherent motion.

PURPOSE: Studies on intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging in the liver have been carried out with different acquisition protocols. The number of acquired slices and the distances between slices can influence IVIM measurements due to saturation effects, but these effects have often been disregarded. This study investigated differences in biexponential IVIM parameters between two slice settings. METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers (21-30 years) were examined at a field strength of 3 T. Diffusion-weighted images of the abdomen were acquired with 16 b values (0-800 s/mm2 ), with four slices for the few slices setting and 24-27 slices for the many slices setting. Regions of interest were manually drawn in the liver. The data were fitted with a monoexponential signal curve and a biexponential IVIM curve, and biexponential IVIM parameters were determined. The dependence on the slice setting was assessed with Student's t test for paired samples (normally distributed IVIM parameters) and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (non-normally distributed parameters). RESULTS: None of the parameters were significantly different between the settings. For few slices and many slices, respectively, the mean values (SDs) for D $$ D $$ were 1.21 µm 2 / ms $$ 1.21{\upmu \mathrm{m}}^2/\mathrm{ms} $$ ( 0.19 µm 2 / ms $$ 0.19\kern0.3em {\upmu \mathrm{m}}^2/\mathrm{ms} $$ ) and 1.20 µm 2 / ms $$ 1.20{\upmu \mathrm{m}}^2/\mathrm{ms} $$ ( 0.11 µm 2 / ms $$ 0.11\kern0.3em {\upmu \mathrm{m}}^2/\mathrm{ms} $$ ); for f $$ f $$ they were 29.7% (6.2%) and 27.7% (3.6%); and for D * $$ {D}^{\ast } $$ they were 8.76 ⋅ 10 - 2 mm 2 / s $$ 8.76\cdot {10}^{-2}{\mathrm{mm}}^2/\mathrm{s} $$ ( 4.54 ⋅ 10 - 2 mm 2 / s $$ 4.54\cdot {10}^{-2}\kern0.3em {\mathrm{mm}}^2/\mathrm{s} $$ ) and 8.71 ⋅ 10 - 2 mm 2 / s $$ 8.71\cdot {10}^{-2}{\mathrm{mm}}^2/\mathrm{s} $$ ( 4.06 ⋅ 10 - 2 mm 2 / s $$ 4.06\cdot {10}^{-2}\kern0.3em {\mathrm{mm}}^2/\mathrm{s} $$ ). CONCLUSION: Biexponential IVIM parameters in the liver are comparable among IVIM studies that use different slice settings, with mostly negligible saturation effects. However, this may not hold for studies that use much shorter TR.