Tracheal extubation of the adult intensive care patient with a predicted difficult airway - a narrative review.

Management of the difficult airway is an important, but as yet poorly-studied, component of intensive care management. Although there has been a strong emphasis on prediction and intubation of the difficult airway, safe extubation of the patient with a potentially difficult airway has not received the same attention. Extubation is a particularly vulnerable time for the critically ill patient and, because of the risks involved and the consequences of failure, it warrants specific consideration. The Royal College of Anaesthetists 4th National Audit Project highlighted differences in the incidence and consequences of major complications during airway management between the operating room and the critical care environment. The findings in the section on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine reinforce the importance of good airway management in the critical care environment and, in particular, the need for appropriate guidelines to improve patient safety. This narrative review focuses on strategies for safe extubation of the trachea for patients with potentially difficult upper airway problems in the intensive care unit.

A preliminary evaluation of plasma b-type natriuretic peptide as a screening test for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in non-cardiac intensive care.

Left ventricular filling and thus diastolic function are frequently monitored and managed in critical care. However, scant data exist regarding possible screening tests for diastolic dysfunction in the intensive care unit (ICU). The present study aimed to evaluate plasma b-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) as a marker of diastolic dysfunction in a single-centre cohort of 'non-cardiac' ICU patients. The ICU is non-cardiac in that it provides mixed medical/surgical services with the exception of cardiology, cardiac surgery and solid organ transplantation. Clinical data were recorded over the first 24 hours of ICU stay for 32 consecutive patients. Transthoracic echocardiogram and blood collection for BNP assay were then performed. Diastolic dysfunction was demonstrated in 34% (n=11). Mean ± standard deviation BNP values were higher with diastolic dysfunction (238 ± 195 vs 72 ± 78 pg/ml; P=0.003). A BNP threshold of >43 pg/ml yielded a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 59%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82. BNP correlated independently with E/e' (R=0.425; P=0.015) (E/e': peak early transmitral velocity [E]/early diastolic mitral annular velocity [e']) but not left ventricular ejection fraction (P=0.8), illness severity (Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II; P=0.3) or fluid balance (P=0.4). Diastolic dysfunction was common in this cohort of non-cardiac ICU patients and was independently associated with a significantly higher BNP. The potential application as a screening test for diastolic dysfunction is likely to require a threshold lower than previously proposed for heart failure.

A comparison of transcutaneous Doppler corrected flow time, b-type natriuretic peptide and central venous pressure as predictors of fluid responsiveness in septic shock: a preliminary evaluation.

Aortic corrected flow time (FTc) is easily measured by Doppler techniques. Recent data using transoesophageal Doppler suggest that it may predict fluid responsiveness in critical care. This use of FTc has not previously been evaluated in septic shock, nor have any studies incorporated transcutaneously measured FTc. Furthermore, no comparison has been made between FTc, plasma B-type natriuretic peptide concentration (BNP) or central venous pressure. The aim of this preliminary study was to compare FTc, BNP and central venous pressure as predictors of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients without cardiac dysrhythmia. This was a prospective study of 10 consecutive adult septic shock patients (in sinus rhythm; 60% mechanically ventilated) treated with intravenous fluid challenge (4% albumin 250 ml over 15 minutes) in a mixed medical/ surgical tertiary intensive care unit. Mean + SD Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 21.8 +/- 12.7. Haemodynamic assessment incorporating transcutaneous aortic Doppler (USCOM) occurred before and five minutes after fluid challenge. Concurrent with initial assessment, blood samples were collected for BNP assay (ADIVA Centaur). Four patients demonstrated an increase in stroke volume > or = 15% (responders). Percent change in stroke volume strongly correlated with baseline FTc (r = -0.81, P = 0.004) but not BNP (r = -0.3, P = 0.4) or central venous pressure (r = -0.4, P = 0.2). Baseline FTc < 350 ms discriminated responders from non-responders (P = 0.047). Our data support FTc as a better predictor of fluid responsiveness than either BNP or central venous pressure in septic shock. Transcutaneous aortic Doppler FTc offers promise as a simple, completely non-invasive predictor of fluid responsiveness and should be evaluated further

A clinician's guide to predicting fluid responsiveness in critical illness: applied physiology and research methodology.

Intravenous fluid administration is often used in critical care with the goal of improving haemodynamics and consequently tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery. While inotropic and vasoactive drugs are often necessary to correct haemodynamic instability, resuscitation usually begins with fluid therapy. As fluid challenge can result in clinical deterioration, the ability to predict haemodynamic response is desirable. In this way it might be possible to avoid unnecessary volume replacement in critically ill patients. Cardiac preload is a concept that accounts for the relationship between ventricular filling and stroke volume. It has been challenging to apply this concept to clinical practice. For this reason, the study of fluid responsiveness is of increasing research and clinical interest. The clinical application of predicting fluid responsiveness requires an understanding of relevant physiological principles. Furthermore, an improved understanding of these principles should assist the clinician in appraising published data, which has been characterised by significant methodological differences. This review aims to assist the clinician by detailing the physiological principles that underlie the prediction of fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. In addition, the potential importance of methodological differences in the cutrent literature will be considered.

B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations and myocardial dysfunction in critical illness.

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is the first biomarker of proven value in screening for left ventricular dysfunction. The availability of point-of-care testing has escalated clinical interest and the resultant research is defining a role for BNP in the investigation and treatment of critically ill patients. This review was undertaken with the aim of collecting and assimilating current evidence regarding the use of BNP assay in the evaluation of myocardial dysfunction in critically ill humans. The information is presented in a format based upon organ system and disease category. BNP assay has been studied in a spectrum of clinical conditions ranging from acute dyspnoea to subarachnoid haemorrhage. Its role in diagnosis, assessment of disease severity, risk stratification and prognostic evaluation of cardiac dysfunction appears promising, but requires further elaboration. The heterogeneity of the critically ill population appears to warrant a range of cut-off values. Research addressing progressive changes in BNP concentration is hindered by infrequent assay and appears unlikely to reflect the critically ill patient's rapidly changing haemodynamics. Multi-marker strategies may prove valuable in prognostication and evaluation of therapy in a greater variety of illnesses. Scant data exist regarding the use of BNP assay to alter therapy or outcome. It appears that BNP assay offers complementary information to conventional approaches for the evaluation of cardiac dysfunction. Continued research should augment the validity of BNP assay in the evaluation of myocardial function in patients with life-threatening illness.