Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Twin Res Hum Genet ; 16(1): 112-6, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23046551

RESUMO

The population-based Northern Survey of Twin and Multiple Pregnancy (NorSTAMP, formerly the Multiple Pregnancy Register) has collected data since 1998 on all multiple pregnancies in North of England (UK) from the earliest point of ascertainment in pregnancy. This paper updates recent developments to the NorSTAMP and presents some early mortality data from the first 10 years of data collection (1998-2007). Since 2005, mothers have been asked to give explicit consent for their identifiable data to be held by the survey, in line with changing guidance and legal frameworks for identifiable data. In 2009, regional standards of care for multiple pregnancies were developed, agreed, and disseminated. During 1998-2007, 4,865 twin maternities (pregnancies with at least one live birth or stillbirth) were registered, with an average twinning rate of 14.9 per 1,000 maternities. The overall stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates in twins were 18.0/1,000 births and 23.0/1,000 live births respectively. Stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates were significantly higher in monochorionic than dichorionic twins: 44.4 versus 12.2 per 1,000 births (relative risk [RR] 3.6, 95% Confidence Intervals [CI] 2.6-5.1), and 32.4 versus 21.4 per 1,000 live births (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.04-2.2) respectively. There was no significant improvement during this period in either stillbirth or neonatal mortality rates in either chorionicity group. This population-based survey is an important source of data on multiple pregnancies, which allows monitoring of trends in multiple birth rates and pregnancy losses, providing essential information to support improvements in clinical care and for epidemiological research.


Assuntos
Coeficiente de Natalidade/tendências , Mortalidade Infantil , Vigilância da População , Gravidez Múltipla , Sistema de Registros , Natimorto/epidemiologia , Gêmeos , Estudos de Coortes , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez
2.
Prenat Diagn ; 27(1): 77-80, 2007 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17154226

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a strategy of daily biophysical profile (BPP) for pregnancies with small-for-gestational-age twins and with absent or reversed end diastolic flow (AREDF) in the umbilical artery of one twin and to assess the latency interval between detection and delivery in monochorionic (MC) and dichorionic (DC) twin pregnancy. METHODS: A search of the Fetal Medicine Database was carried out between 2000 and 2005 at a single tertiary centre to identify all cases with AREDF in the umbilical artery with one small-for-gestational-age twin. Active monitoring with daily BPP was undertaken, once the estimated fetal weights (EFW) was >or= 500 g and at a gestational age of >or= 24 weeks in both twins. Delivery was timed on the basis of an abnormal BPP, two equivocal BPP within 12 h or gestational age of >or= 32(+0) weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-two MC and 17 DC twin pregnancies were identified. There were no fetal losses in the viable actively monitored MC (19) and DC (13) twins. There was a longer latency interval in the MC group at 21.7 days versus 14.4 days in the DC group (p = 0.13). Delivery was indicated for an abnormal BPP (57.8% MC vs 30.8% DC). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of daily BPP can be used to monitor preterm twin fetuses with AREDF, prolonging pregnancy with an acceptable perinatal outcome.


Assuntos
Retardo do Crescimento Fetal/etiologia , Resultado da Gravidez , Gêmeos Dizigóticos , Gêmeos Monozigóticos , Artérias Umbilicais/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Gravidez , Gravidez de Alto Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 16(3): 278-85, 2002 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12123442

RESUMO

Acute antenatal transfer to specialist centres is an accepted practice but few or no regular data are collected regarding the numbers of transfers performed or subsequent pregnancy outcome. We wished to determine the numbers, and the maternal and fetal outcomes following acute antenatal transfer between consultant obstetric units in the former Northern Region of the UK over a 12-month period (1 January-31 December 99). This is a geographically defined population in terms of provision of perinatal services. All acute antenatal transfers were notified centrally. Data pertaining to each transfer were collected at the time of transfer. Subsequent maternal and fetal outcomes were determined from patient records and neonatal databases. The regional annual acute antenatal transfer rate was 3.7 per 1000 deliveries. Most were for fetal reasons, although transfer rates varied between hospitals. The decision to transfer was influenced by distance and availability of paediatric staff. Even units that have similar characteristics show considerable variation in their transfer rates. No adverse incidents occurred during transfer and no major changes in maternal management occurred following transfer. Twenty-four per cent of women remained undelivered following transfer. Women with preterm labour in the absence of ruptured membranes were less likely to deliver than those transferred for other reasons and if they did deliver, their infants were also less likely to need intensive care. We believe audit of acute antenatal transfers should be routinely undertaken. Numbers of transfers might be reduced if delivery and the need for neonatal intensive care could be predicted with greater accuracy. The psychological and financial costs of transfer to women and healthcare providers need to be addressed.


Assuntos
Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Programas Médicos Regionais/organização & administração , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Obstetrícia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Perinatologia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
4.
Twin Res ; 5(5): 436-9, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12537872

RESUMO

A regional population-based Multiple Pregnancy Register was established in 1998, with the aim of collecting detailed information on multiple pregnancies to enable research into mortality and morbidity in multiples. Multiple pregnancies are notified to the Register as soon as they are detected, irrespective of whether they resulted in a spontaneous abortion, termination of pregnancy or registered birth. Nine hundred and twenty-six twin pregnancies were recorded during 1998-99, giving a twinning rate of 14.8 per 1000 maternities (rate at birth 13.0 per 1000 maternities). Sixty one per cent of twin pregnancies were detected before 13 weeks of gestation. Chorionicity was determined in 82.6% of 849 twin maternities with at least one stillbirth or livebirth. The fetal loss rate before 24 weeks of gestation was 10.5% (194/1852). The perinatal and infant mortality rates were 40.6 per 1000 births and 32.6 per 1000 livebirths respectively. A prospective Multiple Pregnancy Register not only allows monitoring of trends in multiple birth rates and mortality, but also etiological research and long-term follow-up studies.


Assuntos
Coeficiente de Natalidade , Prole de Múltiplos Nascimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Gravidez Múltipla/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Aborto Espontâneo/epidemiologia , Declaração de Nascimento , Coeficiente de Natalidade/tendências , Doenças em Gêmeos/epidemiologia , Doenças em Gêmeos/genética , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Morte Fetal/epidemiologia , Humanos , Mortalidade Infantil , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Morbidade , Gravidez , Gravidez de Alto Risco , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA