A rapid stress-testing protocol for the detection of coronary artery disease: comparison of two-stage transesophageal atrial pacing stress echocardiography with dobutamine stress echocardiography.

OBJECTIVES: We compared a new two-stage transesophageal atrial pacing stress echocardiography (TAPSE) protocol with a standard dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) protocol. BACKGROUND: Transesophageal atrial pacing stress echocardiography has been proposed as an efficient alternative to DSE. METHODS: Two-stage TAPSE (85% and 100% of age-predicted maximum heart rate) and DSE (5 to 40 microg/kg/min at 3-min stages with or without atropine) were both performed, in random sequence, in each patient of a study group of 36 patients. Regional wall-motion analysis, patient acceptance (1 = low, 5 = high), hemodynamics and duration for performing and interpreting tests were compared. RESULTS: Transesophageal atrial pacing stress echocardiography was successful in 35 of the 36 patients (feasibility 97%). More TAPSE than DSE studies were called "ischemic" (37% vs. 14%; p = 0.005). Peak heart rate was higher with TAPSE (144 +/- 18 vs. 129 +/- 15 beats/min, p = 0.0001). Peak cardiac index (4.6 +/- 2.1 vs. 5.1 +/- 1.9 liters/min/m2, p = 0.14), patient acceptance score (4.2 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.8 +/- 1.3, p = 0.17) and study duration (14.2 +/- 9.3 vs. 13.3 +/- 3.3 min, p = 0.59) were similar. Recovery time (7.1 +/- 7.6 vs. 16.2 +/- 15.9 min, p = 0.0003) and interpretation time (9.1 +/- 2.8 vs. 13.5 +/- 4.4 min, p = 0.0001) were shorter for TAPSE than for DSE. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage TAPSE permits rapid evaluation of cardiac patients. Peak cardiac index and patient acceptance scores were similar for TAPSE and DSE. Ischemia was detected more often with TAPSE; this result was attributed to the higher peak heart rate obtained with this protocol.

Safety of dobutamine stress echocardiography supervised by registered nurse sonographers.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is widely used for the diagnosis and evaluation of coronary artery disease. Studies examining the safety of this technique typically have involved DSE supervised by physicians. At the Mayo Clinic, experienced registered nurse (RN) sonographers were trained to perform DSE under the direct supervision of a physician. To prove that the safety of DSE was not compromised with the change in supervision, we examined data from 1035 consecutive outpatient studies: 516 patients were monitored by cardiologists or cardiology fellows (group 1) and 519 were monitored by trained RN sonographers (group 2). Risk factors, history of coronary artery disease, stress parameters, and complication rates were similar in both groups. In group 1, one patient experienced sustained ventricular tachycardia requiring treatment. In group 2, one patient experienced ventricular fibrillation during recovery and was successfully resuscitated. Outpatient DSE is safe when supervised by RN sonographers.