Pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol delivered as a combination dry powder via a capsule-based inhaler and a multi-dose inhaler.

AIM: To compare salmeterol (SALM) and fluticasone propionate (FP) systemic exposure following inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) from a unit-dose capsule-based inhaler (Rotacaps(®)/Rotahaler(®)) and a multi-dose dry powder inhaler (Diskus(®)) in healthy volunteers. METHODS: An open-label, randomised, repeat-dose, cross-over, adaptive design study (n = 36 in each part) evaluated SFC 50/250 µg and SFC 50/100 µg in Rotacaps used with two types of Rotahaler inhalers (airflow resistance similar to (S) and lower than (L) Diskus) versus the Diskus. Primary endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval [AUC0-τ] and maximum plasma concentration [Cmax]. RESULTS: SFC 50/250 µg Rotacaps/Rotahaler (S) showed 1.2-1.9-fold greater FP and SALM systemic exposure compared with Diskus. FP and SALM systemic exposure were comparable to DISKUS following SFC 50/250 µg Rotacaps/Rotahaler (L) (90% CI of ratio of Rotahaler to DISKUS within 0.8-1.25) for salmeterol (AUC0-τ and Cmax) and FP (AUC0-τ). Following SFC 50/100 µg Rotacaps/Rotahaler (L), FP and SALM systemic exposures were 1.2-1.4 fold higher in terms of FP (AUC0-τ and Cmax) and salmeterol (Cmax) compared with Diskus. SFC at both doses and via both inhalers was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: SFC 50/250 µg Rotacaps/Rotahaler (L) showed comparable systemic exposure to Diskus in terms of FP AUC and SALM AUC and Cmax. These results merit further progression of SFC 50/250 µg Rotacaps/Rotahaler (L) to phase 3 clinical evaluation in asthma and COPD patients. The lack of pharmacokinetic comparability between the inhalers for SFC 50/100 µg requires further evaluation.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiling of a P2X7 receptor allosteric modulator GSK1482160 in healthy human subjects.

AIMS: This paper describes findings from the first-in-human study for GSK1482160, an orally available allosteric P2X7 receptor modulator. The study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety and tolerability of the compound in healthy subjects. METHODS: Escalating single doses of up to 1 g were administered to healthy subjects in a single-blind and placebo-controlled fashion. Safety, tolerability, blood drug concentrations and ex vivo Il-1ß production in blood were evaluated. RESULTS: Drug concentration peaked within 3.5 h of dosing under fasting conditions and declined thereafter with a relatively short half-life of less than 4.5 h. Exposure was proportional to dose with between subject variability of less than 60%. A PK/PD model quantified Il-1ß as a function of drug exposure. The model allowed simulation of in vivo pharmacology for various untested dose levels and regimens. Furthermore, the mechanistic model supported the hypothesis that the compound reduces the efficacy of ATP at the P2X7 receptor without affecting its affinity. No major safety or tolerability concerns were identified in this small study (n = 29), except for one case of asymptomatic accelerated idioventricular rhythm at the top dose. CONCLUSION: The model-based approach maximized analysis power by integrating all biomarker data and revealed mechanistic insight into the pharmacology of P2X7 modulation by GSK1482160. Simulations by this model ultimately led to the discontinuation of the development of this compound. The therapeutic relevance of the P2X7 receptor remains to be tested in patients. The mechanistic-model-based approach can be applied widely to drug development.

A statistical assessment of QT data following placebo and moxifloxacin dosing in thorough QT studies.

The ICH guidelines indicate that a single "thorough QT study" should be conducted to evaluate the effects of new drugs on cardiac repolarization. A positive control, such as moxifloxacin, is required to be assessed as part of the thorough QT study to validate the assay sensitivity of each study. In order to better understand the effect of moxifloxacin, a meta-analysis of nine thorough QT studies has been undertaken to assess the overall moxifloxacin effect. The data was analyzed using a repeated measures mixed model to test various covariance structures to identify the most suitable model for this and future meta-analyses of thorough QT studies.