Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Gen Med ; 15: 33-43, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35018112

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Currently, colorectal cancer has become a common gastrointestinal malignancy that usually occurs in the colon and rectum, and ferroptosis plays a vital role in the pathology and progression of colorectal tumors. METHODS: A total of 627 patients (51 normal and 644 tumor samples) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-COAD and TCGA-READ were included in the study. Lasso and Cox's regression was employed to analyze the characteristic lncRNAs in colorectal cancer samples, and a distinctive prognostic model of ferroptosis-related lncRNAs was established. By analyzing the divergence between the high and low-risk groups of ferroptosis-related lncRNAs, 15 characteristic lncRNAs related to the prognosis of colorectal cancer were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier analysis, operation characteristic curve (ROC), nomogram, and gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) further confirmed the validity of the characteristic prognostic model with ferroptosis-related lncRNAs. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed a high-risk group of ferroptosis-related lncRNA interrelated with a poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. AUC estimates of 1 -, 3 -, and 5-year survival rates for ferroptosis-related lncRNA characteristic models were 0.745, 0.767 and 0.789. GSEA analysis showed that immune and malignancy-related pathways were active in the high-risk score group. In addition, differential analyses of immune function, including Checkpoint, cytolytic, HLA, and T cell co-inhibition, differed significantly betwixt low - and high-risk groups.CD160, TNFRSF18, CD27, PDCD1, CD200R1, ADORA2A, TNFRSF14, LAIR1, CD244, CD40, TNFRSF4, CD70, TNFSF14, TNFRSF25, CD276, HHLA2, VTCN1, LAG3, TNFSF18, and other immune checkpoints had different expressions betwixt the high- and low-risk group. CONCLUSION: Fifteen kinds of lncRNAs with different expressions (AP003555.1, AC099850.3, AL031985.3, LINC01857, STPG3-AS1, AL137782.1, AC124067.4, AC012313.5, AC083900.1, AC010973.2, ALMS1-IT1, AC013652.1, AC133540.1, AP006621.2, AC018653.3) were closely associated with poor prognosis of colorectal cancer. These indicators were significantly correlated with the overall survival (OS) rate and could be used as prognostic evaluation criteria.

2.
Sensors (Basel) ; 16(7)2016 Jun 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27347964

RESUMO

In the inversion of land surface temperature (LST) from satellite data, obtaining the information on land surface emissivity is most challenging. How to solve both the emissivity and the LST from the underdetermined equations for thermal infrared radiation is a hot research topic related to quantitative thermal infrared remote sensing. The academic research and practical applications based on the temperature-emissivity retrieval algorithms show that directly measuring the emissivity of objects at a fixed thermal infrared waveband is an important way to close the underdetermined equations for thermal infrared radiation. Based on the prior research results of both the authors and others, this paper proposes a new approach of obtaining the spectral emissivity of the object at 8-14 µm with a single-band CO2 laser at 10.6 µm and a 102F FTIR spectrometer. Through experiments, the spectral emissivity of several key samples, including aluminum plate, iron plate, copper plate, marble plate, rubber sheet, and paper board, at 8-14 µm is obtained, and the measured data are basically consistent with the hemispherical emissivity measurement by a Nicolet iS10 FTIR spectrometer for the same objects. For the rough surface of materials, such as marble and rusty iron, the RMSE of emissivity is below 0.05. The differences in the field of view angle and in the measuring direction between the Nicolet FTIR method and the method proposed in the paper, and the heterogeneity in the degree of oxidation, polishing and composition of the samples, are the main reasons for the differences of the emissivities between the two methods.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...