PD-1 Inhibitor Aggravate Irradiation-Induced Myocardial Fibrosis by Regulating TGF-ß1/Smads Signaling Pathway via GSDMD-Mediated Pyroptosis.

Cancer therapy has entered a new era with the use of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors. When combined with thoracic radiotherapy, it demonstrates synergistic anti-tumor effects and potentially worsens radiation-induced myocardial fibrosis (RIMF). RIMF is the final stage of radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD) and a potentially fatal clinical complication of chest radiotherapy. It is characterized by decreased ventricular elasticity and distensibility, which can result in decreased ejection fraction, heart failure, and even sudden cardiac death. Pyroptosis, a type of programmed cell death, is mediated by members of the gasdermin (GSDM) family and has been associated with numerous cardiac disorders. The effect of pyroptosis on myocardial fibrosis caused by a combination of radiotherapy and PD-1 inhibitors remains uncertain. In this study, a 6MV X-ray of 20 Gy for local heart irradiation was used in the RIHD mouse model. We noticed that PD-1 inhibitors aggravated radiation-induced cardiac dysfunction and RIMF, concurrently enhancing the presence of CD8+ T lymphocytes in the cardiac tissue. Additionally, our findings indicated that the combination of PD-1 inhibitor and thoracic radiation can stimulate caspase-1 to cleave GSDMD, thereby regulating pyroptosis and liberating interleukin-8 (IL-18). In the myocardium of mice, the manifestation of pyroptosis mediated by GSDMD is accompanied by the buildup of proteins associated with fibrosis, such as collagen I, transforming growth factor ß1 (TGF-ß1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α). Moreover, it was discovered that TFG-ß1 induced the phosphorylation of Smad2/Smad3 when the cardiac underwent PD-1 inhibitor in conjunction with thoracic irradiation (IR). The findings of this research indicate that PD-1 inhibitor worsen RIMF in mice by triggering GSDMD-induced pyroptosis and influencing the TGF-ß1/Smads pathway. While using the caspase-1 inhibitor Z-YVAD-FMK, RIMF can be alleviated. Blocking GSDMD may be a viable strategy for managing myocardial fibrosis caused by the combination of PD-1 inhibitors and radiotherapy.

Impact of thoracic tumor radiotherapy on survival in non-small-cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion treated with targeted therapy: Propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: EGFR-mutant (EGFR-M) and ALK-positive (ALK-P)are common in malignant pleural effusion (MPE) with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (MPE-NSCLC). The impact of thoracic tumor radiotherapy on survival in such patients remains unclear. We aimed to investigate whether thoracic tumor radiotherapy could improve overall survival (OS) in such patients. METHODS: According to whether or not patients accepted thoracic tumor radiotherapy, 148 patients with EGFR-M or ALK-P MPE-NSCLC treated with targeted therapy were classified into two groups: DT group without thoracic tumor radiotherapy and DRT group with thoracic tumor radiotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance clinical baseline characteristics. Overall survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier, compared by log-rank test, and evaluated using Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Median survival time (MST) was 25 months versus 17 months in the DRT group and DT group. The OS rates at 1, 2, 3, 5 years in the DRT group and DT group were 75.0%, 52.8%, 26.8%, 11.1% and 64.5%, 28.4%, 9.2%, 1.8%, respectively (χ2 = 12.028, p = 0.001). Compared with DT group, the DRT group still had better survival after PSM (p = 0.007). Before and after PSM, factors associated with better OS through multivariable analysis were that thoracic tumor radiotherapy, radiotherapy, N0-2 , and ALK-TKIs. Grades 4-5 radiation toxicities were not observed in patients; 8 (11.6%) and 7 (10.1%) out of the DRT group suffered from Grade 3 radiation esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results for EGFR-M or ALK-P MPE-NSCLC showed that thoracic tumor radiotherapy may be crucial factor in improving OS with acceptable toxicities. Potential biases should not be neglected: Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm this result.

Failure pattern and radiotherapy exploration in malignant pleural effusion non-small cell lung cancer treated with targeted therapy.

Purpose: Actionable mutations are common in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)with malignant pleural effusion(MPE)(MPE-NSCLC). The pattern of failure in MPE-NSCLC treated with targeted therapy after MPE control remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the failure pattern of such patients in a cohort study and explore the possibility of radiotherapy. Patients and methods: Computed tomography scans of 86 patients were reviewed in this study. We classified first pattern of failure after MPE control as initial disease sites only (IF), new distant sites only (NF), or IF and NF detected simultaneously (INF). Patients evaluated suitable for radiotherapy after disease progression were divided into two groups: D group without radiotherapy and RD group with radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analyses. Results: Disease progression after MPE control was observed in 42 patients with complete serial imaging. Median time to any progression was 9.5 months. Rate of the IF, NF and INF were 50%, 17% and 33% for all patients,60%,0% and 40% for patients with MPE recurrence (n=10,23.8%) and 47%, 22% and 31% for patients (n=32,76.2%) without MPE recurrence, respectively. Out of 10 patients(23.8%) with MPE recurrence, 7 patients simultaneous underwent primary tumor progression and 5 MPE were cytologically confirmed in 7 patients with examination. The overall survival (OS )rates at 1, 2, 3 years for the RD group and D group were 88.2%, 50.5%, 21.7% and 80.0%, 20.3%, 0%, respectively; the corresponding MST were 26.1 months and 17.5 months, respectively (χ2 = 4.959, p =0.026). Conclusions: Our data indicates that 50% of patients with actionable mutations MPE- NSCLC after MPE control are likely to fail at their initial sites of disease and the use of radiotherapy may bring OS benefits during the course of their disease. Multicenter RCT is necessary to confirm the result in the future.

Preliminary results of randomized phase II study of etoposide plus lobaplatin or etoposide plus cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in the treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

The purpose is to compare the clinical efficacy and toxicity of etoposide plus lobaplatin (EL) or etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy during the treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Forty-two patients with LS-SCLC were randomly divided into EL ( n = 19) or EP ( n = 23) regimens combined with thoracic intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates in the EL and EP cohorts were 50.8, 38.1, and 12.7%; and 56.5, 43.5, and 29.0%, respectively ( P = 0.527), whereas the 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 72.2, 52.5, and 43.8%; and 73.9, 48.4, and 48.4%, respectively ( P = 0.923). The hematological toxicities were similar in two cohorts. However, gastrointestinal reactions were more severe in the EP group. The incidence of nausea and vomiting in EL and EP cohorts were 31.6% vs. 73.9% ( P = 0.006) and 20.1% vs. 60.9% ( P = 0.009), respectively. The two cohorts did not show ≥grade 4 radiation esophagitis and ≥grade 3 radiation pneumonitis. The incidence of acute radiation esophagitis in EL group was lower ( P = 0.038), both groups showed a similar incidence of radiation pneumonitis ( P = 1.000). EL or EP chemotherapy with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy showed similar PFS and OS. The EL group showed milder gastrointestinal toxicity and radiation esophagitis. Radiation pneumonitis and hematological toxicity were similar in the two regimens, which can be tolerated by patients.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Malignant Pleural Effusion May Require Primary Tumor Radiotherapy in Addition to Drug Treatment.

Purpose: The impact of primary tumour radiotherapy on the prognosis for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with controlled malignant pleural effusion (MPE-C) (MPE-C-NSCLC) is unclear. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of primary tumor radiotherapy in patients with MPE-C-NSCLC. Patients and Methods: A total of 186 patients with MPE-C-NSCLC were enrolled and divided into two groups. The patients in the D group were treated with only drugs. Those in the RD group were treated with drugs plus primary tumour radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and the Log rank test was used for between-group analysis and univariate prognostic analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to perform multivariate analyses to assess the impacts of factors on survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was matched based on clinical characteristics, systematic drug treatment and drug response to further adjust for confounding factors. Results: The overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 2, and 3 years for the RD group and D group were 54.4%, 26.8%, and 13.3% and 31.1%, 11.5%, and 4.4%, respectively; the corresponding MSTs were 14 months and 8 months, respectively (χ 2=15.915, p<0.001). There was a significant difference in survival by PSM (p=0.027).Before PSM, multivariate analysis showed that metastasis status (organ≤3 and metastasis≤5), primary tumour radiotherapy, chemotherapy cycles≥4, and drug best response (CR+PR) were independent predictors of prolonged OS. After PSM, primary tumour radiotherapy and drug best response (CR+PR) were independent predictors of prolonged OS were still independent predictors of prolonged OS. There were no grade 4-5 radiation toxicities. Conclusion: For MPE-C-NSCLC, the response of systemic drug treatment plays a crucial role in survival outcomes, and we also should pay attention to primary tumour radiotherapy in addition to systematic drug treatment.

The Effect of PD-1 Inhibitor Combined with Irradiation on HMGB1-Associated Inflammatory Cytokines and Myocardial Injury.

Purpose: To explore the effect of PD-1 inhibitors combined with irradiation on myocardial injury and the changes of HMGB1-associated inflammatory markers. Methods: Four groups of five mice were used, each groupformed by randomly dividing 20 mice (group A control; group B PD-1 inhibitors; group C Irradiation; group D PD-1 inhibitors+irradiation; n = 5 for each). The mice were treated with either PD-1 inhibitors or a 15 Gy dose of single heart irradiation, or both. Hematoxylin-eosin staining assessed the morphology and pathology of heart tissue; Masson staining assessed heart fibrosis; Tunel staining evaluated heart apoptosis; flow cytometry detected CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T lymphocytes in heart tissues; enzyme linked immunosorbent assay evaluated IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-ɑ of heart tissue; Western blot and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) detected the expression of protein and mRNA of HMGB1, TLR-4, and NF-κB p65 respectively. Results: The degree of heart injury, collagen volume fraction (CVF) and apoptotic index (AI) in groups B, C, and D were higher than group A, but the differences between the CVF and AI of group A and group B were not statistical significance (P>0.05). Similarly, the absolute counts and relative percentage of CD3+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes and the concentrations of IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α in heart tissue with group D were significantly higher than the other groups (P<0.05). In addition, compared with group A, the expression of protein and mRNA of HMGB1 and NF-κB p65 in other groups were higher, and the differences between each group were statistically significant while TLR4 was not. In addition, interaction by PD-1 inhibitors and irradiation was found in inflammatory indicators, especially in the expression of the HMGB1 and CD8+ T lymphocytes. Conclusion: PD-1 inhibitors can increase the expression of HMGB1-associated inflammatory cytokines and aggravate radiation-induced myocardial injury.

International consensus on radiotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for most cases. While radiotherapy has historically served as a palliative modality in metastatic NSCLC, considerable advances in its technology and the continuous development of cutting-edge therapeutic agents, such as targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are increasing its role in the multi-disciplinary management of the disease. Methods: International radiotherapy experts were convened to consider and reach consensuses on the clinical utilities of radiotherapy in metastatic NSCLC, with the aim to provide patient-focused, up to date, evidence-based, recommendations to assist cancer specialists in the management of patients with metastatic NSCLC worldwide. Results: Timely radiotherapy can offer rapid symptom alleviation and allow subsequent aggressive treatment approaches in patients with heavy tumor burden and/or oncologic emergencies. In addition, appropriate incorporation of radiotherapy as concurrent, consolidation, or salvage therapy makes it possible to achieve long-term survival, or even cure, for patients with oligo-metastatic disease. Cranial radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of brain metastasis, potentially augmenting the response and prolonging survival associated with targeted agents and ICIs. However, key questions remain, such as the appropriate choice of radiation techniques, optimal sequence of systemic therapies and radiotherapy, and optimal patient selection for such combination strategies. Although a strong rationale for combining radiotherapy and ICIs exists, its optimal parameters in this setting remain to be established. Conclusions: In the modern era, radiotherapy serves not only as a palliative tool in metastatic NSCLC, but also plays active roles in patients with oligo-focal disease, CNS metastasis and receiving ICIs.

Recombinant human endostatin combined with radiotherapy promotes cardiomyocyte apoptosis in rats via TGFß1/Smads/CTGF signaling pathway.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of recombinant human endostatin (ES) (rh-ES) combined with radiation on rat cardiomyocyte apoptosis and the regulatory mechanism of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-ß1)/Sma and Mad-related protein 3 (Smad3)/connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) signaling. METHOD: The primary cardiomyocytes were isolated from neonatal Sprague-Dawley rats for culture in vitro and divided into blank control group (without treatment), 10 Gy radiation + siTGF-ß1 siRNA (gene silencing) group, ES + siTGF-ß1 siRNA group, and 10 Gy radiation + ES + siTGF-ß1 siRNA group. Methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium assay was used to calculate the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of rh-ES on cardiomyocytes. Adenoviral vector was constructed for virus packaging to silence TGF-ß1 expression in cardiomyocytes. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blot were carried out to analyze TGF-ß1, Smad2, Smad3 and CTGF expression at both gene and protein levels. Flow cytometry and electron microscope were used to examine cell apoptosis. RESULTS: ES had a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on the proliferation of primary rat cardiomyocytes. ES combined with radiotherapy significantly inhibited cardiomyocyte proliferation and promoted cell apoptosis (P < 0.01). The gene and protein expression of TGF-ß1, Smad2, Smad3 and CTGF were significantly up-regulated in primary cardiomyocytes transfected with TGF-ß1 gene (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination therapy with rh-ES and radiation can promote cardiomyocyte apoptosis and aggravate myocardial cell damage via TGF-ß1/Smad3/CTGF signaling pathway.

Effect of PD-1 Inhibitor Combined with X-Ray Irradiation on the Inflammatory Microenvironment and Lung Tissue Injury in Mice.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the effects of PD-1 inhibitor on lung tissue morphology and the immune system in a mouse model of radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) and to assess interactions between radiation therapy and PD-1 inhibition. METHODS: Twenty C57BL/6 mice were divided randomly into four groups of five mice each. Mice were treated with an anti-mouse PD-1 monoclonal antibody, whole thorax irradiation, both or neither. Lung tissue morphology and pathological changes were assessed by hematoxylin-eosin staining; lung fibrosis was assessed by Masson staining and analysis of hydroxyproline; CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T lymphocytes in lung tissues were detected immunohistochemically; and the concentrations of transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in lung tissue were evaluated by cytokine multiplex analysis. RESULTS: Lung injury scores and indicators of pulmonary fibrosis were higher in mice administration whole thorax irradiation than in control mice. Inflammatory infiltrate scores, alveoli deformation scores, collagen volume fractions and hydroxyproline contents in lung tissues were all significantly higher in mice administered PD-1 inhibitor plus irradiation than in the other three groups. Similarly, the percentages of CD3+ and CD8+T cells and the concentrations of IL-6 and TGF-ß1 in lung tissue were significantly higher in mice treated with radiation and PD-1 inhibitor than in the other groups. However, PD-1 inhibitor and irradiation interacted significantly only in the elevation of TGF-ß1 level. CONCLUSION: Whole thorax X-ray irradiation in mice can cause pulmonary injury and fibrosis, which could be exacerbated by PD-1 inhibitors. Radiotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitors may aggravate RILI by synergistically upregulating TGF-ß1 expression, thereby affecting the immune-inflammatory microenvironment in the lungs.

Genetic characteristics of a patient with multiple primary cancers: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Two or multiple primary malignant neoplasms (MPMNs) rarely occur in the same patient. It has been reported that MPMNs are easily misdiagnosed as the recurrence or metastasis of malignancies in clinical practice, affecting the choice of treatment for the patients, thereby resulting in the delay of optimal diagnosis. Next generation sequencing (NGS) can be used to distinguish between multiple primary lung cancers and intrapulmonary metastasis, and may distinguish the origin of tumours in different sites of the body. CASE SUMMARY: We report the case of 66-year-old woman who suffered from different malignant neoplasms in the rectum and esophageal and gastrointestinal tract. The first neoplasm rectal adenocarcinoma was diagnosed and removed in 2016. The second and third lesions were diagnosed with esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) and gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), respectively, in 2019. Next-generation whole exome sequencing was performed on the tissue specimens of rectal carcinoma, esophageal cancer, GIST, and white blood cells to investigate the relationship between malignancies at different timeframe and determine whether the ESCC and GIST evolved from the rectal adenocarcinoma. Mutations including v-Ki-ras2-Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog, adenomatosis polyposis coli, and mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 were detected in rectal adenocarcinoma sample, mast/stem cell growth factor receptor was detected in GIST tissue, and lysine methyltransferase 2D was detected in ESCC specimen. Overall, ESCC and GIST were not genetically evolved from rectal adenocarcinoma, and this patient did not have a trunk driven clone. CONCLUSION: NGS is an effective tool to study clonal evolution of tumours and distinguish between MPMNs and intrapulmonary metastasis.

Reasonable Timing of Radiotherapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer During Targeted Therapy Based on Tumour Volume Change.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the reasonable timing of radiotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR-positive mutations during targeted therapy based on tumour volume change (TVC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Simulation Computed Tomography Scan (SCTS) measurements were taken to test TVC in patients with stage IV NSCLC during targeted therapy at intervals of 10 days. The SCTS measurement was terminated when the tumour volume shrinkage rate in the latter simulation compared with the previous simulation was ≤5% or when the time after treatment was 90 days. Then, primary tumour radiotherapy was performed. Related parameters of the radiotherapy plan were compared between the implementation and simulation plans. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled in the analysis. After treatment, shrinkage of the primary tumour was observed in all patients, but the rate and speed were inconsistent. The average tumour volume decreased obviously within 40 days and was significantly different every 10 days (P ≤ 0.001). The average volume decreased slowly and tended to be stable (P>0.05) after 40 days. After the termination of SCTSs, 21 patients accepted primary tumour radiotherapy. No patients experienced grade 3+ acute radiation toxicity. The implementation radiotherapy plan was significantly better than that before treatment (all P<0.05) but not better than that on the 40th day after treatment (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: To obtain a high radiation dose and control radiation toxicity, the 40th day after targeted therapy may be a reasonable time to start radiotherapy for stage IV NSCLC with EGFR-positive mutations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03258671, identifier, NCT03258671.

Prognostic Model to Predict Overall Survival for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Chemotherapy Combined With Concurrent Radiation Therapy to the Primary Tumor: Analysis From Two Prospective Studies.

PURPOSE: The role of radiotherapy, in addition to chemotherapy, has not been thoroughly determined in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of the study was to investigate the prognostic factors and to establish a model for the prediction of overall survival (OS) in metastatic NSCLC patients who received chemotherapy combined with the radiation therapy to the primary tumor. METHODS: The study retrospectively reviewed 243 patients with metastatic NSCLC in two prospective studies. A prognostic model was established based on the results of the Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that being male, Karnofsky Performance Status score < 80, the number of chemotherapy cycles <4, hemoglobin level ≤120 g/L, the count of neutrophils greater than 5.8 ×109/L, and the count of platelets greater than 220 ×109/L independently predicted worse OS. According to the number of risk factors, patients were further divided into one of three risk groups: those having ≤ 2 risk factors were scored as the low-risk group, those having 3 risk factors were scored as the moderate-risk group, and those having ≥ 4 risk factors were scored as the high-risk group. In the low-risk group, 1-year OS is 67.7%, 2-year OS is 32.1%, and 3-year OS is 19.3%; in the moderate-risk group, 1-year OS is 59.6%, 2-year OS is 18.0%, and 3-year OS is 7.9%; the corresponding OS rates for the high-risk group were 26.2%, 7.9%, and 0% (P<0.001) respectively. CONCLUSION: Metastatic NSCLC patients treated with chemotherapy in combination with thoracic radiation may be classified as low-risk, moderate-risk, or high-risk group using six independent prognostic factors. This prognostic model may help design the study and develop the plans of individualized treatment.

Simultaneous integrated boost of intensity-modulated radiation therapy to Stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer with metastatic lymph nodes.

Local tumor failure remains a major problem after radiation-based nonsurgical treatment for unresectable locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC）and inoperable stage II NSCLC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of simultaneous integrated boost of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) to stage II-III NSCLC with metastatic lymph nodes (ChiCTR 2000029304). Patients were diagnosed by pathology or PET-CT. PTV was divided into two parts as follows, the PTV of primary tumor (PTVp) and the PTV of metastatic lymph nodes (PTVn). The radiotherapy doses were simultaneously prescripted 78 Gy (BED = 101.48 Gy) for PTVp and 60-65 Gy (BED = 73.6-81.25 Gy) for PTVn, 26f/5.2 weeks. Response was scored according to WHO criteria. Radiotherapy toxicity was scored according to RTOG criteria. Hematology and gastrointestinal toxicity were scored according to CTCAE1.0 criteria. A total of 20 patients were enrolled. Seventeen patients were diagnosed by pathology and three patients were diagnosed by PET-CT. All patients were treated with SIB-IMRT. The objective response rate (ORR) was 90%, with CR 25%, PR 65%, NC 10%, and PD 0%. Although radiotherapy toxicity was common, there were no grade ≥3, with radiation pneumonitis (10 cases), esophagitis (17 cases), and dermatitis (12 cases). The local control rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 85%, 75%, and 70%, respectively. The overall survival（OS）and local progression-free survival (LPFS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 90%, 42.6%, and 35.5% and 84.4%, 35.5%, and 28.4%, respectively. SIB-IMRT can significantly improve ORR and survival for stage II-III NSCLC with metastatic lymph nodes, with high safety, and satisfactory efficacy. However, due to the limitation of small sample, these findings are needed to confirm by future trials with a larger sample size.

Randomized phase II study of pemetrexed-cisplatin or docetaxel-cisplatin plus thoracic intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma.

Systemic chemotherapy is the standard treatment modality for stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR wild-type or unknown mutation status. Recent years, there is increasing evidence showed that selected patients with stage IV disease could benefit from aggressive thoracic radiotherapy. Either pemetrexed or docetaxel, combined with cisplatin, can be used for patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma. However, no prospective trials have confirmed that Pem-Cis was superior to Doc-Cis in lung adenocarcinoma. In this randomized phase 2 trial, we evaluated survival outcomes, and toxicity of Pemetrexed-Cisplatin (arm A) or Docetaxel-Cisplatin (arm B) with concurrent IMRT to the primary tumor for stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR wild-type or unknown mutation status. Totally, 101 patients were randomly assigned (50 in arm A and 51 in arm B). Using an intention-to-treat analysis, one-year survival rates were 72.0% and 52.9%, respectively (P=0.020). Progression-free survival was also significantly improved in the arm A (median, 12.6 v 7.5 months, P=0.013). The incidence and severity of acute pneumonitis and esophagitis was similar between two arms. Although more of grade 3 or 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia in arm A, and higher rates grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, and leukopenia were observed in arm B. Pem-Cis first-line chemotherapy with concurrent radiation therapy for stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR wild-type or unknown mutation status represents a potential treatment option with acceptable toxicity and high overall survival rates.

Pemetrexed plus cisplatin versus docetaxel plus cisplatin for stage IV lung adenocarcinoma based on propensity score matching.

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of pemetrexed+cisplatin (PP) versus docetaxel+cisplatin (DP) for the treatment of stage IV lung adenocarcinoma. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 147 patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma treated between January 2011 and December 2015, 100 of which were in the DP group whereas 47 were in the DP group. Main inclusion criteria were treatment-naive patients, first-line treatment with PP or DP with no molecular targeted therapy during treatment, 2-6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy with unknown status of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, 18-75 years of age, and Karnofsky performance status score of at least 70. Prognostic factors for survival were identified by using univariate and multivariate analyses. Propensity score matching was performed to further adjust for confounding. A total of 47 pairs were successfully matched between the two groups. The median overall survival was 9.0 months in the DP group and 17.0 months in the PP group; the 1-year survival rate was 29.8 and 59.6%, respectively; the 2-year survival rate was 12.8 and 21.1%, respectively (χ=4.128, P=0.042); and median progression-free survival was 6.0 and 8.0 months, respectively (χ=4.839, P=0.028). Cox multivariate analysis showed that chemotherapy regimen and number of metastatic organs were independent factors for OS. The effect of the radiotherapy dose on the primary tumor on OS was close to statistically significant. The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was more significantly reduced in the DP group than in the PP group after matching (61.7 vs. 27.7%, P=0.002), with no between-group difference for adverse effects on platelets or hemoglobin. For patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and unknown EGFR mutation status, PP was more effective than DP in prolonging survival and had a less adverse effect on neutrophils.

Might radiation therapy in addition to chemotherapy improve overall survival of patients with non-oligometastatic Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer?: Secondary analysis of two prospective studies.

BACKGROUND: The role of radiation therapy in addition to chemotherapy has not been well established in non-oligometastatic Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to investigate overall survival (OS) of non-oligometastatic Stage IV NSCLC treated with chemotherapy with concurrent radiation to the primary tumor. METHODS: Eligible patients were screened from two prospective studies. Oligometastatic and non-oligometastatic NSCLC were defined as having < 5 and ≥5 metastatic lesions, respectively. Prognostic factors for OS were identified by using univariate and multivariate analysis. Landmark analysis and propensity-score matching (PSM) were each performed to further adjust for confounding. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients were identified as the study cohort: 183 had non-oligometastatic disease. For all 274 patients, those who received a radiation dose ≥63 Gy to the primary tumor and had oligometastatic disease had better OS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.017, respectively). When patients were subdivided into those with oligometastatic or non-oligometastatic disease, a radiation dose ≥ 63 Gy remained a significant prognostic factor for better OS. For non-oligometastatic patients, multivariate analysis showed that receiving ≥63 Gy radiation, having a GTV <146 cm3, having response to chemotherapy, and having stable or increased post-treatment KPS independently predicted better OS (P = 0.018, P = 0.014, P = 0.014, and P = 0.001). After PSM in non-oligometastatic patients, a higher radiation dose (≥63 Gy) remained to be correlated with better OS. By landmark analysis, aggressive radiation (≥63 Gy) remained to be correlated with better OS in Pre-PSM cohort (P = 0.005) and Post-PSM cohort (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation dose, primary tumor volume, response to chemotherapy and KPS after treatment are associated with OS in patients with non-oligometastatic disease; on basis of effective system chemotherapy, aggressive thoracic radiotherapy may prolong OS.

Three-Dimensional Radiation Therapy to the Primary Tumor With Concurrent Chemotherapy in Patients With Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Phase 2 Study From PPRA-RTOG, China.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective multi-institutional phase 2 study was to investigate disease control, survival outcomes, and toxicity after thoracic three-dimensional radiation therapy (3D-RT) with concurrent chemotherapy for newly diagnosed stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients were 18 to 80 years of age, had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score ≥70%, and newly diagnosed stage IV NSCLC with limited metastatic disease (defined as involving ≤3 organs). Patients received platinum-doublet chemotherapy with concurrent irradiation to the primary tumor. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and acute toxicity. RESULTS: From May 2008 to May 2012, 198 eligible patients were enrolled from 7 cancer centers. Most patients died with distant metastasis; only 10% died with isolated primary recurrence. Median OS time was 13.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.7-14.3); OS rates were 53.5% at 1 year, 15.8% at 2 years, and 9.2% at 3 years. Median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.7-10.3); corresponding PFS rates were 30.8%, 8.2%, and 6.1%. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year local (primary tumor) control rates were 78.8%, 57.7%, and 55.4%. Multivariate analysis showed that delivery of ≥63 Gy to the primary tumor (P=.014), having a primary tumor volume <134 cm(3) (P=.008), and having a stable or higher KPS score after treatment (P=.01) were independent predictors of better OS. The most common severe (grades 3-4) acute toxicities were hematologic: leukopenia (37.9%), thrombocytopenia (10.1%), and anemia (6.9%). No patients experienced grade 4 or 5 radiation-related toxicity; 2.5% had acute grade 3 pneumonitis, and 6.6% had acute grade 3 radiation esophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic 3D-RT to the primary tumor with concurrent chemotherapy led to satisfactory survival outcomes with acceptable toxicity. Radiation dose, primary tumor volume, and PFS after treatment all predicted survival in these patients with limited-metastasis NSCLC.

The survival outcomes and prognosis of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer treated with thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The impact of thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy on the prognosis for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer is unclear. This study is to investigate survival outcomes and prognosis in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: Ninety three patients with stage IV NSCLC had received at least four cycles of chemotherapy and thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy of ≥40 Gy on primary tumors. The data from these patients were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 93 patients, the median survival time (MST) was 14.0 months, and the 1, 2, and 3-year survival rates were 54.8%, 20.4%, and 12.9%, respectively. The MST of patients received radiation dose to primary tumor ≥63Gy and <63 Gy for primary tumor were 15.0 and 8.0 months, respectively (P = 0.001). Patients had metastasis to a single site and lower tumor volume (<170 cm(3)) also produced longer overall survival time (P = 0.002, P = 0.020, respectively). For patients with metastasis at a single site, thoracic radiation dose ≥63 Gy remained a prognostic factor for better overall survival (P = 0.030); patients with metastases at multiple sites, radiation dose ≥63 Gy had a trend to improve overall survival (P = 0.062). A multivariate analysis showed that radiation dose ≥63 Gy (P = 0.017) and metastasis to a single site (P = 0.038) are associated with better overall survival, and the volume of primary tumor was marginally correlated with OS (P = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: In combination with systemic chemotherapy, radiation dose ≥63 Gy on primary tumor and metastasis to a single site are significant factors for better OS, aggressive thoracic radiotherapy may have an important role in improving OS.

[Expression of ASPP gene family and its relationship with survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expression of ASPP gene family, and to explore its relationship with the survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Tumor samples collected from 91 pathologically confirmed NSCLC patients treated in the Cancer Hospital of Guiyang Medical University from September 1997 to December 2005 were used in this study. The expression of ASPP1, ASPP2, iASPP, and p53 in the tumor samples were examined by immunohistochemistry. The relevance of ASPP family proteins and survival of the patients was analyzed. RESULTS: In the stage III and IV NSCLC patients, the median survival period of ASPP2-positive group was 18 months and that of negative group was 7 months (P = 0.002). The median survival of stage I NSCLC patients with iASPP-negative group was 22 months and that of the positive group was 2 months (P = 0.00 3). The median survival of patients with stage III NSCLC in the iASPP-negative group was 19 months and that of the positive group was 7 months (P = 0.014 1). In the 54 cases of wild type P53 expression, there were 15 patients with stage III NSCLC patients. Among them, the median survival of ASPP2-positive cases was 22 months and that of the negative cases was 11 months (P = 0.029 3). The median survival period of iASPP-negative cases of stage I NSCLC patients was 41 months and that of positive cases was 7 months (P = 0.021 6). Among the stage III NSCLC patients, the median survival period of iASPP-negative cases was 21 months and that of the positive cases was 2 months (P = 0.001 1). Fifteen patients with stage III NSCLC of the 37 patients with mutant P53 expression, the survival period of the ASPP2-positive cases was significantly longer than that of negative cases (P = 0.019 2). The multivariate analysis showed that expression levels of ASPP2 and iASPP were correlated with prognosis of the patients (P < 0.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Expression of ASPP2 and iASPP is a predictor of survival in NSCLC patients. Expression of ASPP2 is a good prognostic factor, while expression of iASPP is an unfavourable prognostic factor in NSCLC patients.

Radiation dose and survival of patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy: reanalysis of the findings of a single-center prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the radiation dose and response in terms of local-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy. METHODS: In all, we enrolled 201 patients with stage IV NSCLC in this study and analyzed OS in 159 patients and LRPFS in 120. RESULTS: The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 46.2%, 19.5%, 11.7%, and 5.8%, respectively, the median survival time being 12 months. The median survival times in differential treatment response of primary tumors were 19 of complete response, 13 of partial response, 8 of stable disease, and 6 months of progressive disease, respectively (P = 0.000). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year LRPFS rates of patients undergoing four to five cycles with doses ≥63 Gy and <63 Gy were 77.4% and 32.6%, 36.2% and 21.7%, 27.2% and 0, and 15.9% and 0, respectively (P = 0.002). According to multivariate analyses, four to five cycles of chemotherapy, gross tumor volume <175.00 cm3 and post-treatment Karnofsky Performance Status score stable or increased by at least 10 units were independent prognostic factors for better OS (P = 0.035, P = 0.008, and P = 0.000, respectively). Radiation dose to the primary tumor ≥63 Gy resulted in better OS (P = 0.057) and LRPFS (P = 0.051), both findings being of borderline significance. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of IV NSCLC with joint administration of four to five cycles of chemotherapy and three-dimensional radiotherapy may prolong survival, particularly in patients receiving ≥63 Gy radiotherapy, with gross tumor volume <175.00 cm3 and post-treatment Karnofsky Performance Status score not lower than pretreatment values.