Pharmacokinetic investigation of albendazole and praziquantel in Thai children infected with Giardia intestinalis.

The pharmacokinetics of albendazole/albendazole sulphoxide and praziquantel were investigated in Thai children with Giardia infection. Twenty school-age children were randomly allocated to receive either a single oral dose of albendazole (400 mg/child) or the same dose of albendazole given concurrently with a single oral dose of praziquantel (20 mg/kg). The concentrations of albendazole/albendazole sulphoxide and praziquantel in plasma samples, collected at intervals in the first 24 h post-treatment, were then quantified using HPLC with ultra-violet detection. No significant pharmacokinetic interaction between the albendazole and praziquantel was demonstrated. For albendazole sulphoxide, the active metabolite of albendazole, there was marked inter-individual variation in the maximum plasma concentration and the 'area under the curve'. The pharmacokinetics of albendazole sulphoxide were similar whether albendazole was given alone or in combination with praziquantel.

A comparative study of four methods for detecting antibody in asymptomatic giardiasis.

Four immunological methods for diagnosis of giardiasis comprising complement fixation (CF) test, indirect hemagglutination (IHA) test, enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay (ELISA) and lectin immuno test (LIT) were studied. Fifty sera from asymptomatic giardiasis patients, 40 from patients with other diseases and 50 from healthy controls were evaluated. The seropositive rates in asymptomatic giardiasis were 36% for CF, 58% for LIT, 30% for IHA and 72% for ELISA. The seropositive rates in patients with other diseases were 22.5% for CF, 52.5% for LIT, 12.5% for IHA and 67.5% for ELISA. The results suggest that the test of choice for giardiasis was CF with 88% specificity, nevertheless this test showed low sensitivity (36%). Other two tests, ELISA and LIT were more sensitive than CF with percent sensitivity of 72 and 58 respectively, but these two tests had severe disadvantages in being less specific with percentage specificity of 48 and 60 respectively.