RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Interpretation of salivary gland cytology often leads to inter-observer variability due to heterogenous and complex nature of these lesions. This creates a dilemma regarding their management by clinicians. Proposal of a universal system of reporting of salivary gland lesions leading to agreement in diagnosis and better understanding among clinicians was the need of the hour. Hence Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) was proposed in 2015 by the American society of cytopathology and the International Academy of Cytology. Present study was undertaken to assess inter-observer variability in reporting by conventional system and MSRSGC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy-six cases of salivary gland lesions were subjected to fine needle aspiration cytology. Cases were interpreted by two experienced cytopathologists and were reported by both conventional system and MSRSGC. Histopathological correlation was available in 81 cases. RESULTS: Inter-observer variability was noted in six cases reported by conventional system and in two cases by MSRSGC. Moreover three cases out six cases had different management protocols while both cases of Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytology had same management. Thirteen cases diagnosed by Milan system and 17 cases diagnosed by conventional system were discordant with histopathological diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytology has an edge over conventional system of reporting as it provides better agreement among cytopathologists and better management guidelines for clinicians with the added advantage of assessment of risk of malignancy.
