Long-term outcome of endoscopic metallic stenting for benign biliary stenosis associated with chronic pancreatitis.

AIM: Endoscopic metal stenting (EMS) offers good results in short to medium term follow-up for bile duct stenosis associated with chronic pancreatitis (CP); however, longer follow-up is needed to determine if EMS has the potential to become the treatment of first choice. METHODS: EMS was performed in eight patients with severe common bile duct stenosis due to CP. After the resolution of cholestasis by endoscopic naso-biliary drainage three patients were subjected to EMS while, the other five underwent EMS following plastic tube stenting. The patients were followed up for more than 5 years through periodical laboratory tests and imaging techniques. RESULTS: EMS was successfully performed in all the patients. Two patients died due to causes unrelated to the procedure: one with an acute myocardial infarction and the other with maxillary carcinoma at 2.8 and 5.5 years after EMS, respectively. One patient died with cholangitis because of EMS clogging 3.6 years after EMS. None of these three patients had showed symptoms of cholestasis during the follow-up period. Two patients developed choledocholithiasis and two suffered from duodenal ulcers due to dislodgement of the stent between 4.8 and 7.3 years after stenting; however, they were successfully treated endoscopically. Thus, five of eight patients are alive at present after a mean follow-up period of 7.4 years. CONCLUSION: EMS is evidently one of the very promising treatment options for bile duct stenosis associated with CP, provided the patients are closely followed up; thus setting a system for their prompt management on emergency is desirable.

Pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: significance of sampling by peroral pancreatoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The examination of pancreatic juice cytology could hypothetically contribute to the establishment of a definite diagnosis of malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN), but to the authors' knowledge, its significance has not been confirmed to date. The current study was conducted to assess the diagnostic value of pancreatic juice cytology in IPMN and to examine the usefulness of peroral pancreatoscopy (POPS) in sampling pancreatic juice. METHODS: The study subjects were comprised of 103 patients with IPMN who underwent surgical resection of pancreatic tumors (adenoma in 29 patients, borderline in 17 patients, carcinoma in situ in 25 patients, and invasive carcinoma in 32 patients). Pancreatic juice was collected with a catheter in 71 patients and by POPS in 32 patients. Patients with pancreatic carcinoma (n = 81) and chronic pancreatitis (n = 76) also were investigated. RESULTS: The cytologic diagnosis was found to be of nondiagnostic value in only one patient with an IPMN, whereas it was of no diagnostic value in 14 of the patients with pancreatic carcinoma (17.3%), a difference that was statically significant (P < 0.001). The location of the IPMN (either in the pancreas or the pancreatic ducts) was not found to significantly affect the diagnostic value of the test. The sensitivity for IPMN was 62.2% when pancreatic juice was collected by POPS, and was 38.2% when it was collected using a catheter. In the case of pancreatic carcinoma, the sensitivity of pancreatic juice cytology was found to be 25.4%, which was significantly lower than that for IPMN when the pancreatic juice was collected by POPS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic juice cytology was found to have better diagnostic value in the patients with IPMNs compared with those with pancreatic carcinoma. POPS was found to be useful for the collection of pancreatic juice.