Prehabilitation Before Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: Protocol for an Implementation Study.

BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the standard curative treatment for early-stage colorectal and upper gastrointestinal cancer. Reduced preoperative functional capacity, nutritional status, and psychological well-being are associated with poor postoperative outcomes. Prehabilitation aims to improve preoperative functional reserves through physical, nutritional, and psychological interventions. Yet, how it transitions from a trial setting to being integrated into a real-world health setting is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim is to evaluate the implementation of a multimodal (supervised exercise, nutrition, and nursing support) prehabilitation program into standard care for patients with gastrointestinal cancer (colorectal and upper gastrointestinal cancer) scheduled for curative intent surgery. The secondary aim is to determine the impact of a multimodal prehabilitation program on functional capacity, nutritional and psychological status, and surgical outcomes. METHODS: This is an implementation study that will investigate a multimodal prehabilitation intervention, in a nonblinded, nonrandomized, single-group, pre-post design. Patients diagnosed with colorectal and upper gastrointestinal cancer scheduled for potentially curative intent surgery at Concord Repatriation General Hospital, with ≥14 intervention days prior to surgery and are medically cleared to exercise will be eligible. The study will be evaluated using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance Evaluation Framework. RESULTS: The protocol was approved in December 2019 by the Concord Repatriation General Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (reference number 2019/PID13679). Recruitment commenced in January 2020. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, recruitment was paused in March 2020 and reopened in August 2020 with remote or telehealth intervention adaptations. Recruitment ended on December 31, 2021. Over the 16-month recruitment period, a total of 77 participants were recruited. CONCLUSIONS: Prehabilitation represents an opportunity to maximize functional capacity and improve surgical outcomes. The study will provide guidance and contribute to the evidence on the integration of prehabilitation into standard care using adaptive models of health care delivery including telehealth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTR 12620000409976; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=378974&isReview=true. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/41101.

Long lasting effect on testes following methylene blue injection in laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Injection of methylene blue to testis has been shown to have adverse effect in animal studies but it is still being used frequently as lymphatic mapping agent during lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy in adolescent varicoceles. We aim to report postoperative ultrasound changes after subaortic injection of methylene blue in human testes. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study of consecutive patients under 18 years old undergoing laparoscopic varicocelectomy from August 2017 to August 2021 was performed. Demographics such as age, symptoms, pre-operative testicular volume was collected. Primary outcome was change on testicular ultrasound at 3, 6, 12 months after the operation. Secondary outcome was testicular volume difference between affected and unaffected testes, and growth rate of affected testis at 1 year after the operation. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included, with median age of 15 years old (IQR 11-18 years). Thirty-one patients had non-lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy (Group A) and 27 patients had lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy (Group B). There was no statistical difference between the mean testicular volume difference between the two groups, but hydrocele rate was significantly higher in Group A (16% vs 0%, p = 0.03). In group B, 6 patients (22.2%, p = 0.005) developed testicular change detectable by ultrasound. No statistical difference could be demonstrated for median testicular size difference (between affected and unaffected testes) at 1 year between group with and without ultrasound change (-23% vs 0%, p = 0.36). Median follow up time was 20.4 months (IQR 5-32 months). DISCUSSION: Varicocele treatments improve testicular volume and increase total sperm concentration and lymphatic sparing surgery significantly decreased post-operative hydrocele rates [2]. Different agents have been used to delineate lymphatic vessels and one commonly used agent is methylene blue [10,15-16]. However it has been shown in other animal studies that intraparenchymal injection of methylene blue to rat testis result in degenerative changes [18]. Our study is the first to describe post-operative changes of human testes on imaging after lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy with subdartoic injection of methylene blue. Six patients (22.2%) demonstrated new onset testicular changes on post-operative ultrasound. Although no statistically significant testicular volume reduction was seen in the group with change on imaging, these observations may serve as a surrogate marker for testicular injury or reduced testicular function. It will be desirable for future studies if we can investigate it further with hormonal markers or semen analysis after puberty has been reached. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic sparing procedure reduced post-operative hydrocele in adolescent varicocele, however long-lasting effect on testis is evident with subdartoic injection of methylene blue. This agent must be used with caution and long term follow up of these patients are needed.

Outpatient hysteroscopy is effective for uterine cavity evaluation following failed office-based endometrial biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Failure to obtain an office-based endometrial biopsy for abnormal uterine bleeding is not uncommon. Although operating room-based procedures are traditionally considered the gold standard assessment tool in these circumstances, outpatient hysteroscopy is a less invasive, more cost-effective, and safer alternative. However, there is no contemporary Canadian literature on the effectiveness of an outpatient approach for this specific population. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of outpatient hysteroscopy for uterine cavity evaluation for patients who have failed an in-office endometrial biopsy attempt. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients referred to an academic outpatient hysteroscopy unit between January 2015 and January 2018, who underwent an outpatient hysteroscopy following failed endometrial biopsy. Data were collected from electronic medical records. RESULTS: Of the 407 consecutive patients who underwent an outpatient hysteroscopic procedure, 68 met inclusion criteria. Postmenopausal bleeding was the most common indication for initial biopsy, and most failures were attributed to cervical stenosis. Outpatient hysteroscopies were successfully completed in 96% of cases (n = 65/68). Failure resulted from either anxiety and discomfort (n = 2), or severe intrauterine adhesions (n = 1). Overall, 10% of patients subsequently required an operating room-based hysteroscopy, either to complete a myomectomy or polypectomy, or to allow general anesthesia. Outpatient hysteroscopy identified endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in 4.5% and 3% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Outpatient hysteroscopy following unsuccessful office endometrial biopsy attempts appears to be a feasible, safe, and cost-effective investigation strategy that may prevent the need for an operating room-based procedure in 90% of cases.

Short-term multimodal prehabilitation improves functional capacity for colorectal cancer patients prior to surgery.

AIM: Evaluate feasibility and outcomes of a multimodal prehabiliation program in patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer (CRC) awaiting surgery. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective CRC resection at Concord Repatriation General Hospital were recruited from pre-admission clinic between January and November 2018. Participants received a 2-4 week prehabilitation program consisting of supervised exercise sessions, nurse-led phone support, and written nutritional information. Participants were assessed at baseline, pre-surgery, and 4 weeks post-surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients participated in the program: 55% male; median age 73 (56-86) years. Six (28%) required an interpreter. At baseline, 19 of 22 (86%) had at least one comorbidity. Median intervention length was 11.5 days (range 7-29). Participants attended 79% of scheduled exercise sessions (range 33-100%, mean 3.5 sessions) and 66% of nurse support calls (range 0-100%, mean 2.6 sessions). Between baseline and pre-surgery, participants reported increasing mean unsupervised moderate-intensity aerobic exercise from 17 (range 0-210) to 73 minutes/week (range 0-276) and mean vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise from 0 to 24 minutes/week (range 0-300). Resistance exercise sessions increased from 0.6 to 2.6 times/week. Mean 6-minute walk test distance increased by 48 meters (435-483 m) and 30-second "sit to stand" by 1.6 repetitions. Small improvements were seen in global quality of life and fatigue. Nutritional status and body composition remained unchanged. All participants were satisfied/strongly satisfied with the program and would recommend it to others. CONCLUSION: Our multimodal prehabilitation program was feasible in CRC patients inclusive of those from non-English speaking backgrounds, with improvement in functional capacity before CRC surgery.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Older Adults Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery is increasingly applied in older adults undergoing colorectal surgery. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of enhanced recovery protocols on clinical outcomes including hospital-acquired geriatric syndromes in older adults undergoing colorectal surgery. DATA SOURCES: This review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and trial registry databases were searched (January 1980 to April 2020). STUDY SELECTION: Two researchers independently screened all articles for eligibility. Randomized controlled trials evaluating enhanced recovery protocols in older adults undergoing colorectal surgery were included. INTERVENTION: The enhanced recovery protocol was utilized. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes of interest were functional decline and delirium. Other outcomes studied were length of stay, complications, readmission, mortality, gut function, mobilization, pain, reoperation, quality of life, and psychological status. RESULTS: Seven randomized trials (n = 1277 participants) were included. In terms of hospital-acquired geriatric syndromes, functional decline was reported in 1 study with benefits reported in enhanced recovery after surgery participants, and meta-analyses showed reduced incidence of delirium (risk ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-0.98). Meta-analyses also showed reduction in urinary tract infections (risk ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.90), time to first flatus (standardized mean differences, -1.00; 95% CI, -1.98 to -0.02), time to first stool (standardized mean differences, -0.59; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.42), time to mobilize postoperatively (standardized mean differences, -0.92; 95% CI, -1.27 to -0.58), time to achieve pain control (standardized mean differences, -0.59; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.28), and hospital stay (mean differences, -2.20; 95% CI, -3.46 to -0.94). LIMITATIONS: The small number of randomized trials in older adults is a limitation of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced recovery protocols in older adults undergoing colorectal surgery appear to reduce the incidence of delirium and functional decline, 2 important hospital-acquired geriatric syndromes, as well as to improve other clinical outcomes. Future research should measure these geriatric syndromes and focus on high-risk older adults including those with frailty.

Recurrence and colon cancer-specific death in patients with large bowel obstruction requiring urgent operation: a competing risks analysis.

AIM: Clinical presentation with large bowel obstruction has been proposed as a predictor of poor long-term oncological outcomes after resection for colorectal cancer. This study examines the association between obstruction and recurrence and cancer-specific death after resection for colon cancer. METHOD: Consecutive patients who underwent resection for colon cancer between 1995 and 2014 were drawn from a prospectively recorded hospital database with all surviving patients followed for at least 5 years. The outcomes of tumour recurrence and colon cancer-specific death were assessed by competing risks multivariable techniques with adjustment for potential clinical and pathological confounding variables. RESULTS: Recurrence occurred in 271 of 1485 patients who had a potentially curative resection. In bivariate analysis, obstruction was significantly associated with recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) 2.23, CI 1.52-3.26, p < 0.001] but this association became nonsignificant after adjustment for confounders (HR 1.53, CI 0.95-2.46, p = 0.080). Colon cancer-specific death occurred in 238 of 295 patients who had a noncurative resection. Obstruction was not significantly associated with cancer-specific death (HR 1.02, CI 0.72-1.45, p = 0.903). In patients who had a noncurative resection, the competing risks incidence of colon cancer-specific death was not significantly greater in obstructed than in unobstructed patients (HR 1.02, CI 0.72-1.45, p = 0.903). CONCLUSION: Whilst the immediate clinical challenge of an individual patient presenting with large bowel obstruction must be addressed by the surgeon, the patient's long-term oncological outcomes are unrelated to obstruction per se.

The new locally endemic genus Yazdana (Caryophyllaceae) and patterns of endemism highlight the high conservation priority of the poorly studied Shirkuh Mountains (central Iran).

Although mountain ranges are often recognized as global biodiversity hotspots with a high level of endemism, diversity and biogeographic connections of isolated and weakly explored mountains remain poorly understood. This is also the case for Shirkuh Mts. in central Iran. Here, Yazdana shirkuhensis gen. & spec. nov. (Caryophylleae, Caryophyllaceae) is described and illustrated from the high alpine zone of this mountain. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of nuclear and plastid DNA sequence data show that Y. shirkuhensis is related to Cyathophylla and Heterochroa (tribe Caryophylleae). The newly described genus and species accentuate Shirkuh Mts. as a center of endemism, which harbors a high number of narrowly distributed species, mostly in high elevations reaching alpine habitats. As this area is currently not protected, a conservation priority is highlighted for high elevations of Shirkuh Mts.

Impact of post-haemorrhoidectomy pain relief checklists on pain outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhoidectomy is associated with significant post-operative pain which is primarily managed pharmacologically. Whether a non-pharmacological adjunct such as a checklist can improve pain outcomes after an open haemorrhoidectomy has yet to be studied. The purpose of this study was to determine if a patient-completed checklist of prescribed post-haemorrhoidectomy pain medications would improve pain management after surgery. METHODS: We conducted a dual-centre randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing a Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic third or fourth degree haemorrhoids. Thirty-five patients were randomized into either a control group which received post-operative pain medication plus a visual analogue scale (VAS) form, or an intervention group which received a post-operative medication checklist in addition to the items the control group received. Both groups recorded their pain levels on the VAS forms at 10.00, 14.00 and 20.00 hours each day for 14 days post-operatively. RESULTS: Patients in the checklist group reported a significantly greater reduction in mean VAS pain score of 2.51 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-3.68; P < 0.001) between day 1 post-op and day 14 post-op compared to 1.86 (95% CI 0.77-2.95; P = 0.001) for the control group. There was no significant difference between mean pain experienced by patients in either group over each of the 14 days individually or overall (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: The pain medication checklist lead to a greater reduction in pain between day 1 and 14 after an open haemorrhoidectomy compared to standard care but did not significantly reduce mean pain across any individual days or overall.

Evaluating the Prevalence of Regret With the Decision to Proceed With a Hysterectomy in Women Younger than Age 35.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate prevalence of regret with the decision to undergo a hysterectomy at a young age. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at two centres and included patients who underwent an elective hysterectomy for benign indications under age 35, between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2015. Eligible patients were contacted and completed a validated decision regret survey and patient health questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients met the study criteria. Of the 95 patients who could be contacted, 71 consented to participate (response rate, 75%). The most common indications for surgery were menorrhagia (35.2%), uterine fibroids (22.5%), endometriosis (19.7%), and pain (15.5%). Overall, 91.5% of patients agreed that having this surgery was the right decision for them, and 90% said that they would make the same choice in the future. A total of 2.8% regretted the choice that they made, and 14% responded that this caused them harm. Over 95% of patients reported that the decision was either mostly patient driven or shared with the physician. CONCLUSION: This is the first evaluation of regret after hysterectomy specifically examining a younger patient population. The study results suggest that patients who are appropriately counselled do not regret their decision to proceed with hysterectomy.

Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in <50 years old patients - where is the evidence?

Abstract Aortic valve disease is one of the most common valvular heart diseases in the cardiovascular category. Surgical replacement of the diseased aortic valve remains the definitive intervention for most diseases. There is a clear consensus that in young patients who require aortic valve replacement, a mechanical prosthesis is the preferred choice due to its durable prosthesis without fear of wear and tear over time. However, this comes at the expense of increased risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events; in addition, there is a lack of strict evidence in using bioprosthesis in patients younger than 50 years. The objective of this review article is to assess the current evidence behind using bioprosthetic aortic valve in this young cohort.

Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in <50 Years Old Patients - Where is the Evidence?

Aortic valve disease is one of the most common valvular heart diseases in the cardiovascular category. Surgical replacement of the diseased aortic valve remains the definitive intervention for most diseases. There is a clear consensus that in young patients who require aortic valve replacement, a mechanical prosthesis is the preferred choice due to its durable prosthesis without fear of wear and tear over time. However, this comes at the expense of increased risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events; in addition, there is a lack of strict evidence in using bioprosthesis in patients younger than 50 years. The objective of this review article is to assess the current evidence behind using bioprosthetic aortic valve in this young cohort.

Perianal sepsis: surgical perspective and practical MRI reporting for radiologists.

This article describes the development of a structured MRI reporting template and diagrammatic worksheet for perianal sepsis through collaboration between radiologists and colorectal surgeons at our institution, and the rationale behind each component of the worksheet. Benefits of this reporting worksheet include optimizing communication of key imaging findings that have a real impact on patient management, less time spent on reporting the study, and easier comparison between studies. We illustrate the utility of the report template with case studies. We summarize the current surgical approaches to perianal sepsis to help radiologists focus on reporting the findings relevant to surgical planning.

When does curatively treated colorectal cancer recur? An Australian perspective.

BACKGROUND: While most colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrences reportedly occur within 3 years following curative treatment, many studies are limited by short-term follow-up. This study examines the time to recurrence of CRC in a large Australian cohort with a long follow-up period and assesses whether time to recurrence has changed over time. METHODS: A comprehensive prospective database of patients undergoing resection for CRC is maintained at Concord Hospital, Sydney. Demographic and time to recurrence data were extracted for patients who developed a recurrence following potentially curative resection for colon cancer from 1995 to 2010 and rectal cancer from 1971 to 2010. Non-deceased patients had a minimum of 5 years follow-up. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2010, 2575 patients with CRC underwent surgery. After exclusions, 386 had recurrence following potentially curative resection, ranging from 1 to 172.5 months (median 20.3) after treatment. Within 1 year, 27.5% recurred, 57.5% by 2 years, 74.6% by 3 years, 85.5% by 4 years and 89.6% by 5 years. There was no difference in time to recurrence between colon and rectal cancers (P = 0.674). Among patients having a potentially curative resection for rectal cancer between 1971 and 2010, 386 recurred. There was no difference in time to recurrence by decade (P = 0.863). CONCLUSION: The majority of recurrences occurred within 3 years of curative treatment. Had surveillance been limited to 5 years, detection of more than 10% of recurrences would have been delayed. Time to recurrence for rectal cancer has not changed in over 40 years, despite treatment advances.