Immunological monitoring during combination of patient-oriented peptide vaccination and estramustine phosphate in patients with metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Additive antitumor effects could be achieved by combination of immunotherapy and cytotoxic agents with no or minimum suppression. METHODS: Thirteen patients positive for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A24 or -A2 with metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) who had failed to respond to the prior-peptide vaccination were entered in the combined peptide vaccination and estramustine phosphate. Conducted immune monitoring on those 13 patients were mainly peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) precursor analysis by IFN-gamma productions and peptide-reactive IgG by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Grade 3 arrhythmia or cerebral infarction was observed in two cases, and Grade 1 or 2 dermatologic reaction at the vaccination sites was observed in all 13 cases. Eleven patients who received more than one cycle of treatment were eligible for immunological and clinical evaluation. There was no significant immunosuppression in most cases when the peptide and a half dose (280 mg/day) of estramustine were administrated, whereas severe immunosuppression was observed in the first two patients who received both the peptide and a full dose (560 mg/day) estramustine. Augmentation of peptide-specific CTL precursors or peptide-specific IgG was observed in 6 of 11 or 10 of 11 cases, respectively. Ten of 11 patients showed serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level decrease from the baseline including 8 patients with a serum PSA level decrease of > or =50%. CONCLUSIONS: These results encouraged the further evaluation of the combination of peptide vaccination and low-dose estramustine phosphate for metastatic HRPC patients.

Phase I trial of patient-oriented vaccination in HLA-A2-positive patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

To evaluate the safety and toxicity of peptide vaccination for patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) based on pre-existing peptide-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) precursors in the circulation, 10 patients positive for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2 with metastatic HRPC were enrolled in a phase I study. Peptide-specific CTL-precursors reactive to 16 kinds of vaccine candidates in the pre-vaccination peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were measured, and patients were followed by vaccination with only positive peptides (up to 4 kinds of peptides). Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were monitored regularly. The peptide vaccination was safe and well tolerated with no major adverse effects. The most common toxicities were dermatologic reactions at the injection site. Increased CTL response to peptides was observed in 4 of 10 patients. Anti-peptide IgG was also detected in post-vaccination sera of 7 of 10 patients. One patient showed the disappearance of a pelvic bone metastasis after five vaccinations. Three patients showed a decrease of serum PSA level from the baseline after the vaccination, but no patients showed a serum PSA level decrease of >/= 50%. The median survival duration of study patients was 22 months with follow-up from 3 to 27 months. We consider that the increase in cellular and humoral immune responses, and decrease in PSA level in some patients justify further development of peptide vaccination for metastatic HRPC patients.

Induction of cellular and humoral immune responses to tumor cells and peptides in HLA-A24 positive hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients by peptide vaccination.

BACKGROUND: To assess the safety and immune response of a peptide-based immunotherapy for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, a phase I clinical trial was conducted. METHODS: This study first investigated whether cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) precursors reacting to peptide with vaccine candidates (14 peptides for HLA-A24 positive patients) were detectable in the pre-vaccination peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of ten patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Patients were then vaccinated subcutaneously with only those peptides to which pre-vaccination PBMCs reacted (CTL precursor-oriented peptide vaccine) for up to four kinds of peptides. RESULTS: Overall vaccinations were generally well tolerated, but most patients (nine of ten) developed grade 1 local redness and swelling at the injection site. Increased CTL response to both peptides and cancer cells were observed in four of ten patients. Anti-peptide IgG antibodies were also detected in post-vaccination sera of seven of ten patients. One patient achieved a partial response with an 89% decrease in PSA. Stable disease was demonstrated in five of ten patients (50%) for the median duration of 2 months (range, 2-5 months). There were no objective responses of measurable lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Increase in cellular and humoral immune responses, and decrease in PSA level in some patients support further development of peptide-based immunotherapy for hormone refractory prostate cancer.