Association between administration or recommendation of the human papillomavirus vaccine and primary care physicians' knowledge about vaccination during proactive recommendation suspension: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: The Japanese government suspended the proactive recommendation of the human papillomavirus vaccine (HPVv) in 2013, and the vaccination rate of HPVv declined to <1% during 2014-2015. Previous studies have shown that the recommendation by a physician affects a recipient's decision to receive a vaccine, and physicians' accurate knowledge about vaccination is important to increase vaccine administration. This study aimed to evaluate the association between physicians' knowledge of vaccination and the administration or recommendation of HPVv by primary care physicians (PCPs) in the absence of proactive recommendations from the Japanese government. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study analysed data obtained through a web-based, self-administered questionnaire survey. SETTING: The questionnaire was distributed to Japan Primary Care Association (JPCA) members. PARTICIPANTS: JPCA members who were physicians and on the official JPCA mailing list (n=5395) were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary and secondary outcomes were the administration and recommendation of HPVv, respectively, by PCPs. The association between PCPs' knowledge regarding vaccination and each outcome was determined based on their background and vaccination quiz scores and a logistic regression analysis to estimate the adjusted ORs (AORs). RESULTS: We received responses from 1084 PCPs and included 981 of them in the analysis. PCPs with a higher score on the vaccination quiz were significantly more likely to administer the HPVv for routine and voluntary vaccination (AOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.28; AOR 2.71, 95% CI 1.81 to 4.04, respectively) and recommend the HPVv for routine and voluntary vaccination than PCPs with a lower score (AOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.92; AOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.67, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that providing accurate knowledge regarding vaccination to PCPs may improve their administration and recommendation of HPVv, even in the absence of active government recommendations.

Factors associated between behavior of administrating or recommending mumps vaccine and primary care physicians' knowledge about vaccination: A nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, the mumps-containing vaccine was withdrawn from routine vaccination in 1993, and it became a voluntary vaccination. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the physicians' knowledge about vaccinations and the administration or recommendation of the mumps vaccine. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study targeting primary care physicians (PCPs) in Japan. We used a web-based self-administered questionnaire by Preventive Medicine and Health Promotion Committee Vaccine Team, the Japan Primary Care Association (JPCA), from March to June in 2019. The outcome of the study was the association between PCPs' knowledge about vaccine and the administration or recommendation of mumps vaccine. We obtained the information on background, subsidies of mumps vaccination for children from the local government, and vaccination quiz scores. We performed logistic regression analysis to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among 10,470 PCPs in JPCA, 5075 were excluded. We received responses from 1084 PCPs (20.1%) and enrolled 981 participants in the analysis. PCPs with a higher score on the vaccination quizzes were significantly more likely to administrate the mumps vaccine for adults (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.93, 95% CI 1.45-2.59, p < 0.001) and recommend mumps vaccine to adults than PCPs with a lower score (AOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.33-2.40, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We revealed an association between the administration or recommendation of mumps vaccine and PCPs' better vaccination knowledge.