The association of depressive symptoms and urinary incontinence among older adults.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship of urinary incontinence (UI) and depressive symptoms (DS) in older adults. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial to determine the effects of clinical practice guideline implementation on provider attitudes and behavior, and patients' UI, health status, quality of life, and satisfaction with care. Baseline and endpoint data were collected from patients via computer-assisted telephone interviewing. SETTING: Forty-one nonacademic primary care practices (PCP) in North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 668 community-dwelling adults (age > 60) who had visited the one of the selected PCPs. INTERVENTION: PCPs in the intervention group were given instruction in the detection and management of UI, educational materials for providers and patients, office system supports, and academic detailing. MEASUREMENTS: The dependent measure was assessed using an eight-item screener for DS. UI (status, frequency, amount), health (physical, mental), and demographic (age, gender, marital status) and self-report information about bladder control served as predictors. RESULTS: Wilcoxon rank sum tests showed that UI status was associated with moderate to severe DS (43% vs 30%, P = .05). Multivariate analyses showed that UI status, physical and mental health, and gender were significant predictors of DS. Among UI adults (n = 230), physical and mental health, life satisfaction, and the perception that UI interfered with daily life were significant predictors of DS. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides clear evidence that UI is related to DS in older adults.

Communication between older adults and their physicians about urinary incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common but undertreated condition in older adults. The study objective was to determine older patients' characteristics related to communication patterns with their physicians about UI. METHODS: Telephone surveys of a sample of patients age 60 and older who visited a primary care provider (PCP) for any reason within the past 2 months were conducted. Participating physicians included general internists and family physicians from 41 primary care practices located in the 17 counties of northwest North Carolina whose 435 incontinent and 711 continent patients completed the surveys. The main outcome measures were patients' frequency and amount of urinary leakage, being asked about incontinence, and initiating a discussion of incontinence if not asked by their PCP. RESULTS: Age and gender were significant independent predictors of incontinence. PCPs were significantly more likely to assess incontinent women than incontinent men (21% vs 10%, p = .053). The older cohorts of older adults were significantly more likely to be symptomatic for UI than their younger counterparts. However, the younger cohorts were more likely to be screened for incontinence by their physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the publication of guidelines on improving the screening and management of UI, the problem remains common and underdetected in older adults. Physicians don't ask and patients don't tell. Interventions are needed to remind physicians to screen high risk patients and to encourage patients with UI to communicate with their physicians.

Relationship between patient reports of urinary incontinence symptoms and quality of life measures.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if patient reports of urinary incontinence symptoms can predict quality of life as measured by the short forms of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory, two standardized, disease-specific instruments. METHODS: Telephone surveys were conducted of 384 community dwelling incontinent women, aged 60 years and older, who admitted to at least one episode of incontinence per week during the previous 3 months. Subjects were asked if they considered the incontinence a problem, as well as questions regarding volume and frequency of voids and urine loss. Each subject completed both standardized quality of life questionnaires. Responses to incontinence symptom questions were correlated with the standardized measures. RESULTS: The question, "Do you consider this accidental loss of urine a problem that interferes with your day-to-day activities or bothers you in other ways?" was the best predictor of the subject's responses to both quality-of-life measures, with a correlation coefficient of 0.69 for the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and 0.67 for the Urogenital Distress Inventory. The patients' symptoms that best correlated with both quality of life measures and the report of bothersome incontinence were frequent episodes of incontinence (0.40-0.58), greater amounts of urine loss (0.26-0.54), and more frequent voids (0.24-0.41). CONCLUSION: Primary care practitioners may screen for problematic incontinence by asking if patients' incontinence is bothersome to them and by obtaining simple historic information on voiding and leaking patterns. These questions may provide an efficient tool to detect bothersome incontinence in older women.

Rural/urban elderly and siblings: their value consensus.

Consensus is the level of agreement about life felt among kin and has been identified as a dimension of family solidarity with important implications for the family network. This investigation studied the factors contributing to the consensus between older adults (age sixty-five and older) and the sibling with whom they had the most contact. Respondents (N = 275) lived in a rural/urban area. Seven independent variables were entered into a multiple-regression model to determine their relative importance to consensus of the sibling relationship. Results showed that 7 percent of the variance in consensus could be explained. Filial expectations, educational disparity, and the brother/sister link were the only variables of relative importance to older adult/sibling consensus. There was greater consensus when there were fewer expectations of the sibling, similarity of educational backgrounds, and when the respondent was male and his sibling was female. Brother/sister and brother/brother links, residential proximity, communication by mail or telephone, helping behaviors, and marital status were of no relative importance to consensus. The results suggest that factors previously found to be associated with intergenerational consensus may vary in their importance to intragenerational consensus.