Quality indicators for integrating oncology and home palliative care in Japan: modified Delphi study.

CONTEXT: Home palliative care service increases the chance of dying at home, particularly for patients with advanced cancer, but late referrals to home palliative care services still exist. Indicators for evaluating programs that can facilitate the integration of oncology and home palliative care have not been defined. OBJECTIVES: This study developed quality indicators for the integration of oncology and home palliative care in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review (Databases included CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Emcare) and a modified Delphi study to develop the quality indicators. Panelists rated a potential list of indicators using a 9-point scale over three rounds according to two criteria: appropriateness and feasibility. The criterion for the adoption of candidate indicators was set at a total mean score of 7 or more. Final quality indicators with no disagreement were included. RESULTS: Of the 973 publications in our initial search, 12 studies were included. The preliminary list of quality indicators by systematic literature review comprised 50 items. In total, 37 panelists participated in the modified Delphi study. Ultimately, 18 indicators were identified from the following domains: structure in cancer hospitals, structure in home palliative care services, the process of home palliative care service delivery, less aggressive end-of-life care, patient's psychological comfort, caregiver's psychological comfort, and patient's satisfaction with home palliative care service. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive quality indicators for the integration of oncology and home palliative care were identified. These indicators may facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration between professional healthcare providers in both cancer hospitals and home palliative care services.

U-shaped link of health checkup data and need for care using a time-dependent cox regression model with a restricted cubic spline.

We explored risk indicators likely to result in older adults needing certified long-term care in Japan and ascertained whether this relationship forms a U-shaped link. We analyzed a community-based cohort of residents in Kitanagoya City, Aichi Prefecture, Japan. Participants were 3718 individuals aged 65 years and above who underwent health examinations between April 1, 2011 and March 31, 2012. For continuous clinical variables, we applied a time-dependent Cox regression model. Two types of models were applied-a linear and nonlinear model with restricted cubic splines-to assess the U-shaped association. Statistical significance (set at 0.05) for the nonlinearity was tested by comparing the spline and linear models. Among the participants, 701 were certified as needing Level 1 care or higher during a follow-up. Among the continuous clinical variables, the nonlinear model for body mass index, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase revealed significant U-shaped associations as compared with the linear model in which the outcome was a certification of the need for nursing care. These results provide an important insight into the usefulness of nonlinear models for predicting the risk of such certification.

[Current Status and Improvement Strategies for Integrating Home Palliative Care in Oncology-A Qualitative Study].

This study aimed to investigate healthcare providers' experiences and examine potential strategies for integrating oncologic home palliative care(HPC). This qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews via a web-conferencing system. The data underwent thematic analysis. The participants were 27 healthcare professionals, including oncologists, palliative care physicians, home palliative care physicians, nurses, and medical social workers. Two themes were identified; current status and improvement strategies. Current status encompassed 3 sub-themes: late HPC services involvement, few opportunities for early HPC services introduction, and early referral to HPC establishes rapport with patients. Improvement strategies included 6 sub-themes: interdisciplinary teams meeting to consider patients' hope, identification of outpatients that would benefit from HPC services, HPC service introduction via home visit nursing agencies and outpatient clinics, HPC services introduction via outpatient palliative care clinics, and booklet for patients and families. Numerous participants regarded the timing of HPC services referral as late and had experienced few cases of integrated oncologic HPC. Potential strategies existed in both hospital and home settings. The interdisciplinary collaboration between healthcare providers in both hospital and home settings may facilitate the integration of HPC in oncology.

Integrating home palliative care in oncology: a qualitative study to identify barriers and facilitators.

PURPOSE: Access to and close links with home palliative care services are essential to ensure seamless transitions between care settings in anticancer treatment. However, the timing of referrals to home palliative care services is often delayed. We explored barriers to and facilitators of improving the integration of home palliative care and medical oncology experienced by healthcare professionals in Japan. METHODS: This qualitative study involved semi-structured focus groups and individual interviews conducted via a web conferencing system. Participants were 27 healthcare professionals, including oncologists, palliative care physicians, home palliative care physicians, nurses from both cancer hospitals and home visit nursing agencies, and social workers from cancer hospitals. RESULTS: Barriers and facilitators were grouped into three themes: (1) perspectives and ideas on integrating oncology and home palliative care; (2) barriers; and (3) facilitators. Barriers included seven sub-themes: lack of referral criteria for home palliative care services; financial elements related to home palliative care services; patients' lack of understanding of the illness trajectory; collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death; frequent visits to cancer hospitals; variations in home palliative care services; and problems in providing treatment and care at home. Facilitators included two sub-themes: relationships between oncologists and home palliative care physicians, and cancer hospital staff experience/knowledge of home palliative care. CONCLUSION: This study identified barriers and facilitators to integrating home palliative care and oncology. Some barriers experienced by professionals were comparable with barriers to early integration of palliative care into oncology.