Practicing Serious Illness Conversations in a Pulmonary Medicine Teaching Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Physician trainees in pulmonary medicine are not provided with supervised practice opportunities to gain confidence and skill in having serious illness conversations in the ambulatory setting. OBJECTIVE: We incorporated a palliative medicine attending into an ambulatory pulmonology teaching clinic to provide supervised opportunities for serious illness conversations. METHODS: Trainees in a pulmonary medicine teaching clinic requested supervision from a palliative medicine attending based on a set of evidence-based pulmonary-specific triggers that indicate advanced disease. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to determine the trainee's perceptions of the educational intervention. RESULTS: The palliative medicine attending supervised 8 trainees in 58 patient encounters. The most common trigger for palliative medicine supervision was answering "no" to the "surprise question." At baseline, all trainees cited lack of time as the primary barrier to having serious illness conversations. Themes emerging from post-intervention semi-structured interviews included trainees learning that (1) patients are grateful to have conversations about the severity of their illness, (2) patients do not have a good sense of their prognosis, and (3) with improved skills, these conversations can be conducted efficiently. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary medicine trainees were provided practice opportunities for having serious illness conversations under the supervision of the palliative medicine attending. These practice opportunities effected trainee perception on important barriers to further practice.

Reducing Racial Disparities in the Timeliness of Potential Lung Cancer Evaluation With a Novel Application-Supported Rapid Outpatient Diagnostic Program: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid outpatient diagnostic programs (RODP) expedite lung cancer evaluation, but their impact on racial disparities in the timeliness of evaluation is less clear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the impact of an internally developed application-supported RODP on racial disparities in timely referral completion rates for patients with potential lung cancer at a safety-net healthcare system. An application screened referrals to pulmonology for indications of lung mass or nodule and presented relevant clinical information that enabled dedicated pulmonologists to efficiently review and triage cases according to urgency. Subsequent care coordination was overseen by a dedicated nurse coordinator. To determine the program's impact, we conducted an interrupted time series analysis of the monthly fraction of referrals completed within 30 days, stratified by those identified as White, non-Hispanic and those that were not (racial and ethnic minorities). RESULTS: There were 902 patients referred in the 2 years preintervention and 913 in the 2 years postintervention. Overall, the median age was 63 years, and 44.7% of referred patients were female. 44.2% were White, non-Hispanic while racial and ethnic minorities constituted 54.3%. After the intervention, there was a significant improvement in the proportion of referrals completed within 30 days (62.4% vs. 48.2%, P <.01). The interrupted time series revealed a significant immediate improvement in timely completion among racial and ethnic minorities (23%, P < .01) that was not reflected in the majority White, non-Hispanic subgroup (11%, not significant). CONCLUSION: A thoughtfully designed and implemented RODP reduced racial disparities in the timely evaluation of potential lung cancer.