Arthroscopic Implantation of Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction Improves Cartilage Regeneration and Pain Relief in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.

Purpose: To compare the pain relief and cartilage repair status of patients with knee osteoarthritis who received arthroscopic treatment with or without stromal vascular fraction (SVF) implantation. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the patients who were examined with 12-month follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after arthroscopic treatment for knee osteoarthritis from September 2019 to April 2021. Patients were included in this study if they had grade 3 or 4 knee osteoarthritis according to the Outerbridge classification in MRI. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used for pain assessment over the follow-up period (baseline and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups). Cartilage repair was evaluated using follow-up MRIs based on Outerbridge grades and the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue scoring system. Results: Among 97 patients who received arthroscopic treatment, 54 patients received arthroscopic treatment alone (conventional group) and 43 received arthroscopic treatment along with SVF implantation (SVF group). In the conventional group, the mean VAS score decreased significantly at 1-month post-treatment compared with baseline (P < .05), and gradually increased from 3 to 12 months' post-treatment (all P < .05). In the SVF group, the mean VAS score decreased until 12 months post-treatment compared with baseline (all P < .05 except P = .780 in 1-month vs 3-month follow-ups). Significantly greater pain relief was reported in the SVF group than in the conventional group at 6 and 12 months' post-treatment (all P < .05). Overall, Outerbridge grades were significantly greater in the SVF group than in the conventional group (P < .001). Similarly, mean Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue scores were significantly greater (P < .001) in the SVF group (70.5 ± 11.1) than in the conventional group (39.7 ± 8.2). Conclusions: The results regarding pain improvement and cartilage regeneration and the significant correlation between pain and MRI outcomes at 12-months follow-up indicate that the arthroscopic SVF implantation technique may be useful for repairing cartilage lesions in knee osteoarthritis. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fractions Are Comparable With Allogenic Human Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells as a Supplementary Strategy of High Tibial Osteotomy for Varus Knee Osteoarthritis.

Purpose: To compare the clinical, radiologic, and second-look arthroscopic outcomes of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with stromal vascular fraction (SVF) implantation versus human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSC) transplantation and identify the association between cartilage regeneration and HTO outcomes. Methods: Patients treated with HTO for varus knee osteoarthritis between March 2018 and September 2020 were retrospectively identified. In this retrospective study, among 183 patients treated with HTO for varus knee osteoarthritis between March 2018 and September 2020, patients treated with HTO with SVF implantation (SVF group; n = 25) were pair-matched based on sex, age, and lesion size with those who underwent HTO with hUCB-MSC transplantation (hUCB-MSC group; n = 25). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Radiological outcomes evaluated were the femorotibial angle and posterior tibial slope. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically before surgery and during follow-up. The mean final follow-up periods were 27.8 ± 3.6 (range 24-36) in the SVF group and 28.2 ± 4.1 (range, 24-36) in the hUCB-MSC group (P = 0.690). At second-look arthroscopic surgery, cartilage regeneration was evaluated using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade. Results: A total of 17 male and 33 female patients with a mean age of 56.2 years (range, 49-67 years) were included. At the time of second-look arthroscopic surgery (mean, 12.6 months; range, 11-15 months in the SVF group and 12.7 months; range, 11-14 months in the hUCB-MSC group, P = .625), the mean International Knee Documentation Committee score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in each group significantly improved (P < .001 for all), and clinical outcomes at final follow-up further improved in both groups when compared with the values at second-look arthroscopic surgery (P < .05 for all). Overall ICRS grades, which significantly correlated with clinical outcomes, were similar between groups with no significant differences (P = .170 for femoral condyle and P = .442 for tibial plateau). Radiologic outcomes at final follow-up showed improved knee joint alignment relative to preoperative conditions but showed no significant correlation with clinical outcomes or ICRS grade in either group (P > .05 for all). Conclusions: Improved clinical and radiological outcomes and favorable cartilage regeneration were seen after surgery for varus Knee OA in both SVF and hUCB-MSC groups. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Cartilage lesion size and number of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells strongly influenced the SVF implantation outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis following stromal vascular fraction implantation and assessed the associated prognostic factors. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 43 patients who underwent follow-up magnetic resonance imaging 12 months after stromal vascular fraction implantation for knee osteoarthritis. Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale and measured at baseline and 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up appointments. In addition, cartilage repair was evaluated based on the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue scoring system using the magnetic resonance imaging from the 12-month follow-up. Finally, we evaluated the effects of various factors on outcomes following stromal vascular fraction implantation. RESULTS: Compared to the baseline value, the mean visual analogue scale score significantly and progressively decreased until 12 months post-treatment (P < 0.05 for all, except n.s. between the 1 and 3-month follow-ups). The mean Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue score was 70.5 ± 11.1. Furthermore, the mean visual analogue scale and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue scores significantly correlated 12 months postoperatively (P = 0.002). Additionally, the cartilage lesion size and the number of stromal vascular fraction cells significantly correlated with the 12-month visual analogue scale scores and the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue score. Multivariate analyses determined that the cartilage lesion size and the number of stromal vascular fraction cells had a high prognostic significance for unsatisfactory outcomes. CONCLUSION: Stromal vascular fraction implantation improved pain and cartilage regeneration for patients with knee osteoarthritis. The cartilage lesion size and the number of stromal vascular fraction cells significantly influenced the postoperative outcomes. Thus, these findings may serve as a basis for preoperative surgical decisions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Finite element analysis of femoral component sagittal alignment in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been an increasing interest in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, changes in biomechanics for femoral component alignment in mobile-bearing TKA have not been explored in depth. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical effect of sagittal alignment of the femoral component in mobile-bearing TKA. METHODS: We developed femoral sagittal alignment models with -3°, 0°, 3°, 5°, and 7° flexion. We also examine the kinematics of the tibiofemoral (TF) joint, contact point on the TF joint, contact stress on the patellofemoral (PF) joint, collateral ligament force, and quadriceps force using a validated computational model under a deep-knee-bend condition. RESULTS: Posterior kinematics of the TF joint increases as the femoral component flexes. The contact stress on the PF joint, collateral ligament force, and the quadriceps force decreases as the femoral component flexes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that a slight, approximately 0°âˆ¼3°, flexion of the implantation could be an effective substitute technique. However, excessive flexion should be avoided because of the potential loosening of the TF joint.

Factors Influencing Clinical and MRI Outcomes of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implantation With Concomitant High Tibial Osteotomy for Varus Knee Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Cartilage repair procedures using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can provide superior cartilage regeneration in the medial compartment of the knee joint when high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is performed for varus knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, few studies have reported the factors influencing the outcomes of MSC implantation with concomitant HTO. PURPOSE: To investigate the outcomes of MSC implantation with concomitant HTO and to identify the prognostic factors that are associated with the outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 71 patients (75 knees) were retrospectively evaluated after MSC implantation with concomitant HTO. Clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to assess cartilage regeneration. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the effect of different factors on clinical, radiographic, and MRI outcomes. RESULTS: Clinical and radiographic outcomes improved significantly from preoperatively to final follow-up (P < .001 for all), and overall cartilage regeneration was encouraging. Significant correlations were found between clinical and MRI outcomes. However, radiographic outcomes were not significantly correlated with clinical or MRI outcomes. Patient age and number of MSCs showed significant correlations with clinical and MRI outcomes. On multivariate analyses, patient age and number of MSCs showed high prognostic significance with poor clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: MSC implantation with concomitant HTO provided feasible cartilage regeneration and satisfactory clinical outcomes for patients with varus knee OA. Patient age and number of MSCs were important factors that influenced the clinical and MRI outcomes of MSC implantation with concomitant HTO for varus knee OA.

Comparative matched-pair cohort analysis of the short-term clinical outcomes of mesenchymal stem cells versus hyaluronic acid treatments through intra-articular injections for knee osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) has shown promises in reducing pain and improving physical function in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Recently, cell-based therapies using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as potential treatments. However, few studies have compared the treatment outcomes between MSCs and HA. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of intra-articular injections of MSCs versus HA in patients with knee OA. METHODS: A cohort of 209 patients with knee OA were retrospectively screened for those who underwent intra-articular injections using MSCs or HA. Thirty MSC-treated patients (MSC group) were pair-matched with thirty HA-treated patients (HA group) based on gender and age. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) rating system, and Lysholm scoring system. Radiological evaluation was assessed using the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grading system. RESULTS: MSC treatment yielded consistent significant improvements in VAS, IKDC and Lysholm scores. In the HA group, VAS scores significantly decreased at 1 month, slightly increased at 3 months, and increased significantly from 3 months to 1 year after injection. The IKDC and Lysholm scores improved significantly until 3 months, but gradually worsened thereafter. Significantly greater improvements in VAS (P = 0.041), IKDC (P = 0.014), and Lysholm (P = 0.020) scores were observed in the MSC group compared to those in the HA group at 1-year post-treatment. The K-L grade worsened in a few patients, especially those in the HA group, albeit no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: MSC group showed better VAS, IKDC, and Lysholm scores at 1-year post-treatment, compared to the HA group, although earlier clinical improvements were superior in the HA group for the initial 3 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implantation in Knee Osteoarthritis: Midterm Outcomes and Survival Analysis in 467 Patients.

BACKGROUND: A cell-based tissue engineering approach that uses mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has addressed the issue of articular cartilage repair in knees with osteoarthritis (OA). PURPOSE: To evaluate the midterm outcomes, analyze the survival rates, and identify the factors affecting the survival rate of MSC implantation to treat knee OA. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 467 patients (483 knees) who underwent MSC implantation on a fibrin glue scaffold for knee OA with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were determined based on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner activity scale results measured preoperatively and during follow-up. Standard radiographs were evaluated using Kellgren-Lawrence grading. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the survival rate and the effect of different factors on the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The mean IKDC scores (baseline, 39.2 ± 7.2; 1 year, 66.6 ± 9.6; 3 years, 67.2 ± 9.9; 5 years, 66.1 ± 9.7; 9 years, 62.8 ± 8.5) and Tegner scores (baseline, 2.3 ± 1.0; 1 year, 3.4 ± 0.9; 3 years, 3.5 ± 0.9; 5 years, 3.4 ± 0.9; 9 years, 3.2 ± 0.9) were significantly improved until 3 years postoperatively and gradually decreased from 3- to 9-year follow-up (P < .05 for all, except for Tegner score at 5 years vs 1 year [P = .237]). Gradual deterioration of radiological outcomes according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grade was found during follow-up. Survival rates based on either a decrease in IKDC or an advancement of radiographic OA with Kellgren-Lawrence scores were 99.8%, 94.5%, and 74.5% at 5, 7, and 9 years, respectively. Based on multivariate analyses, older age and the presence of bipolar kissing lesion were associated with significantly worse outcomes (P = .002 and .013, respectively), and a larger number of MSCs was associated with significantly better outcomes (P < .001) after MSC implantation. CONCLUSION: MSC implantation provided encouraging outcomes with acceptable duration of symptom relief at midterm follow-up in patients with early knee OA. Patient age, presence of bipolar kissing lesion, and number of MSCs were independent factors associated with failure of MSC implantation.

Implantation of mesenchymal stem cells in combination with allogenic cartilage improves cartilage regeneration and clinical outcomes in patients with concomitant high tibial osteotomy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the clinical, radiological, and second-look arthroscopic outcomes of implanting mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) alone and together with allogenic cartilage in patients treated with concomitant high tibial oteotomy (HTO) for varus knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Eighty patients treated with cartilage repair procedures and concomitant HTO were prospectively randomized into two groups: MSC implantation (MSC group), and MSC implantation with allogenic cartilage (MSC-AC group). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm Score and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at preoperative and every follow-up visit. Radiological outcomes were evaluated by measuring the femorotibial angle and posterior tibial slope. During second-look arthroscopy, cartilage regeneration was evaluated according to the Kanamiya grade. RESULTS: Clinical outcomes at the second-look arthroscopy (mean 12.5 months [MSC group] and 12.4 months [MSC-AC group]) improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.001 for all). Clinical outcomes from the second-look arthroscopy to the final follow-up (mean 27.3 months [MSC group] and 27.8 months [MSC-AC group]) improved further only in the MSC-AC group (P < 0.05 for all). Overall, the Kanamiya grades, which were significantly correlated with clinical outcomes, were significantly higher in the MSC-AC group than in the MSC group. Radiological outcomes at final follow-up revealed improved knee joint alignments relative to preoperative conditions but without significant correlation between clinical outcomes and Kanamiya grade in either group (n.s. for all). CONCLUSION: Implantation of MSCs with allogenic cartilage is superior to implantation of MSCs alone in cartilage regeneration accompanied with better clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level II.

Effect of sagittal femoral component alignment on biomechanics after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been increasing interest in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, changes in biomechanics with respect to femoral component alignment in mobile-bearing TKA have not been explored in depth. This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical effect of sagittal alignment of the femoral component in mobile-bearing TKA. METHODS: We developed femoral sagittal alignment models with - 3°, 0°, 3°, 5°, and 7°. We also examined the kinematics of the tibiofemoral (TF) joint, contact point on the TF joint, contact stress on the patellofemoral (PF) joint, collateral ligament force, and quadriceps force using a validated computational model under a deep-knee-bend condition. RESULTS: Posterior kinematics of the TF joint increased as the femoral component flexed. In addition, contact stress on the PF joint, collateral ligament force, and quadriceps force decreased as the femoral component flexed. The results of this study can assist surgeons in assessing risk factors associated with femoral component sagittal alignment for mobile-bearing TKA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that slight flexion implantation may be an effective alternative technique because of its advantageous biomechanical effect. However, excessive flexion should be avoided because of potential loosening of the TF joint.

Effect of joint line preservation on mobile-type bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: finite element analysis.

In this study, we performed a virtual mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) on the contact pressure in the tibial insert and articular cartilage by using finite element (FE) analysis to understand clinical observations and elaborate on the potential risks associated with a joint line preservation such as wear on tibial insert and osteoarthritis on other compartment. Neutral position of the knee joint was defined in 0 mm joint line, and contact pressure between tibial insert and articular cartilage varies with respect to changes of joint line. Therefore, evaluation of contact pressure may provide the degree of joint line preservation. The FE model for the joint line was developed using a perpendicular projection line from the medial tibial plateau to the anatomical axis. Seven FE models for joint lines in cases corresponding to ± 6, ± 4, ± 2, and 0 mm were modeled and analyzed in normal level walking conditions. The maximum contact pressure on the superior and inferior surfaces of the polyethylene insert increased when the joint line became positive while the maximum contact pressure on the articular cartilage increased when the joint line became negative. The increase in the maximum contact pressure in the positive joint line exceeded that in the negative joint line, and this lead to an unsymmetrical maximum contact pressure distribution with respect to the joint line from a 0 reference. The joint line elevation was sensitive to increases or decreases in maximum contact pressures in the mobile-bearing UKA. The findings of the study determined that postoperative joint line preservation is important in mobile-type bearing UKA.

The Effect of Patient-Specific Instrumentation Incorporating an Extramedullary Tibial Guide on Operative Efficiency for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

This retrospective study was to determine if patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) leads to shortened surgical time through increased operating room efficiency according to different tibial PSI designs. 166 patients underwent primary TKA and were categorized into three groups as follows: PSI without extramedullary (EM) tibial guide (group 1, n = 48), PSI with EM tibial guide (group 2, n = 68), and conventional instrumentation (CI) group (group 3, n = 50). Four factors were compared between groups, namely, operative room time, thickness of bone resection, tibial slope, and rotation of the component. The mean surgical time was significantly shorter in the PSI with EM tibial guide group (group 2, 63.9 ± 13.6 min) compared to the CI group (group 3, 82.8 ± 24.9 min) (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the PSI without EM tibial guide group (group 1, 75.3 ± 18.8 min). This study suggests that PSI incorporating an EM tibial guide may lead to high operative efficiency in TKA compared to CI. This trial is registered with KCT0002384.

Patient-specific instrumentation development in TKA: 1st and 2nd generation designs in comparison with conventional instrumentation.

INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to determine if the difference in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based 2nd generation patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) design affects post-operative restoration of neutral mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared with the 1st generation PSI design and conventional surgical techniques. In addition, it is aimed at elucidating whether PSI improves surgical efficiency with respect to operating room time, estimated blood loss and the number of instrument trays used intra-operatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report our experience in TKA using PSI techniques in 234 patients from August 2012 to March 2015. The patients were divided into 1st (n = 64) and 2nd (n = 70) generation PSI design. The control group (n = 100) underwent TKA with the conventional instrument technique. RESULTS: The mean surgical time was significantly shorter in the 2nd generation PSI design (62.1 ± 12.1 min) than in the control group (80.6 ± 21.7 min; P < 0.001). A mechanical axis malalignment of >3° of the lower limb was observed in 5.7% of the patients in 2nd generation PSI design compared with 26.0% of the control group (P = 0.006). No significant difference in mechanical alignment on post-operative long alignment radiography was found between 20.3% of the patients in 1st generation PSI design and the control group (P = 0.584). CONCLUSION: The 1st generation PSI design did not have a shorter surgical time or improved alignment compared with conventional instrumentation (CI). However, the use of the perfectly fitted 2nd generation PSI design was associated with improvements in both of these measurements. This study emphasizes the importance of PSI design in intra-operative and post-operative outcomes of TKA.

Importance of joint line preservation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Finite element analysis.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective surgical technique for pain relief and functional restoration in patients with localized osteoarthritis of the knee joint. However, the role of the joint line in UKA, especially its biomechanical effect, has not been previously investigated. This study numerically evaluates the effects of the joint line on the contact stresses in polyethylene (PE) inserts, articular cartilage, and lateral meniscus using the finite element (FE) analysis. The FE model for joint line was modeled as the orthogonal projection line from the medial tibial plateau to the anatomical axis. The joint line was varied from -6 to +6 mm in 2 mm intervals, and the seven FE models were analyzed and compared under ISO gait loading conditions. The contact stresses in the PE insert, articular cartilage, and lateral meniscus matched those of the reference joint line (0 mm) in the ±2 and ±4 mm joint line cases but significantly differed from the reference in the ±6 mm joint line cases. On the +6 mm joint line, the contact stress was greater on the PE insert than on the articular cartilage, whereas the reverse occurred on the -6 mm joint line. This study confirms the post-operative significance of joint line preservation in UKA implantation surgery. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:347-352, 2017.

Comparative Matched-Pair Analysis of the Injection Versus Implantation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Knee Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based tissue engineering approach has been developed to address the problem of articular cartilage repair in knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, the most effective method of MSC application has not yet been established. PURPOSE: To compare the injection and implantation of MSCs in patients with knee OA in terms of clinical and second-look arthroscopic outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Among 182 patients treated with arthroscopic surgery using MSCs for knee OA from October 2010 to August 2012, patients treated with an injection of MSCs in combination with platelet-rich plasma (injection group; n = 20) were pair-matched with patients who underwent MSC implantation on a fibrin glue scaffold (implantation group; n = 20) based on sex, age, and lesion size. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Tegner activity scale, and cartilage repair was assessed arthroscopically with the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grading system. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) IKDC and Tegner activity scores significantly improved from 38.5 ± 9.2 to 55.2 ± 15.0 and from 2.5 ± 1.2 to 3.5 ± 1.2, respectively, in the injection group and from 36.6 ± 4.9 to 62.7 ± 14.1 and from 2.3 ± 0.9 to 3.6 ± 1.1, respectively, in the implantation group at the time of second-look arthroscopic surgery (mean, 12.6 months postoperatively) (P < .001 in all cases). At final follow-up (mean, 28.6 months postoperatively), the mean IKDC and Tegner activity scores in the implantation group had improved further to 64.8 ± 13.4 and 3.9 ± 1.0, respectively (P < .001 and P = .035, respectively), while no significant improvements were found in the injection group (P = .130 and P = .655, respectively). At final follow-up, there was a significant difference in the mean IKDC score between groups (P = .049). Significant correlations between the number of administered MSCs and the postoperative clinical outcomes were found only in the injection group. Significant correlations between the clinical outcomes and the ICRS grades were found in both groups. The ICRS grades were significantly better in the implantation group (P = .041). In the injection group, 2 of the 20 lesions (10%) were grade I (normal), 5 (25%) were grade II (near normal), 8 (40%) were grade III (abnormal), and 5 (25%) were grade IV (severely abnormal). In the implantation group, 6 of the 20 lesions (30%) were grade I, 7 (35%) were grade II, 4 (20%) were grade III, and 3 (15%) were grade IV. CONCLUSION: Utilizing the described method, MSC implantation for knee OA resulted in better clinical and second-look arthroscopic outcomes than an MSC injection.

The Effect of Femoral Cutting Guide Design Improvements for Patient-Specific Instruments.

Although the application of patient-specific instruments (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) increases the cost of the surgical procedure, PSI may reduce operative time and improve implant alignment, which could reduce the number of revision surgeries. We report our experience with TKA using PSI techniques in 120 patients from March to December 2014. PSI for TKA were created from data provided by computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); which imaging technology is more reliable for the PSI technique remains unclear. In the first 20 patients, the accuracy of bone resection and PSI stability were compared between CT and MRI scans with presurgical results as a reference; MRI produced better results. In the second and third groups, each with 50 patients, the results of bone resection and stability were compared in MRI scans with respect to the quality of scanning due to motion artifacts and experienced know-how in PSI design, respectively. The optimized femoral cutting guide design for PSI showed the closest outcomes in bone resection and PSI stability with presurgical data. It is expected that this design could be a reasonable guideline in PSI.

Mesenchymal stem cell implantation in osteoarthritic knees: is fibrin glue effective as a scaffold?

BACKGROUND: The cell-based tissue engineering approach that uses mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has addressed the issue of articular cartilage repair in osteoarthritic (OA) knees. However, to improve outcomes, an advanced surgical procedure with tissue-engineered scaffolds may be needed to treat patients with large cartilage lesions. PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical and second-look arthroscopic outcomes of the implantation of MSCs loaded in fibrin glue as a scaffold in patients with OA knees and to compare these outcomes with those of MSC implantation without a scaffold. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated 54 patients (56 knees) who were examined with second-look arthroscopy after MSC implantation for cartilage lesions in their OA knees. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 37 patients (39 knees) were treated with MSC implantation without a scaffold (group 1), and 17 patients (17 knees) underwent implantation of MSCs loaded in fibrin glue as a scaffold (group 2). Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the Tegner activity scale, and cartilage repair was assessed with the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade. Statistical analyses were performed to identify various prognostic factors associated with the clinical and second-look arthroscopic outcomes. RESULTS: At final follow-up (mean, 28.6 months; range, 24-34 months), the mean IKDC score and Tegner activity scale in each group significantly improved: group 1, from 38.1±7.7 to 62.0±11.7 (IKDC) and from 2.5±0.9 to 3.5±0.8 (Tegner); group 2, from 36.1±6.2 to 64.4±11.5 (IKDC) and from 2.2±0.8 to 3.8±0.8 (Tegner) (P<.001 for all). According to the overall ICRS cartilage repair grades, 9 of the 39 lesions (23%) in group 1 and 12 of the 17 lesions (58%) in group 2 achieved a grade of I or II. There was a significant difference in ICRS grades between the groups (P=.028). Overweight (body mass index≥27.5 kg/m2) and large lesion size (≥5.7 cm2) were significant predictors of poor clinical and arthroscopic outcomes in group 1 (P<.05 for both). There was a similar trend in group 2, but the differences were not significant, possibly owing to the smaller sample size. CONCLUSION: Clinical and arthroscopic outcomes of MSC implantation were encouraging for OA knees in both groups, although there were no significant differences in outcome scores between groups. However, at second-look arthroscopy, there were better ICRS grades in group 2.

Biomechanical comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing for unicomparmental knee arthroplasty using finite element analysis.

Unicomparmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a popular alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and high tibial osteotomy for unicompartmental knee conditions, especially in young patients. However, failure of UKA occurs due to either progressive osteoarthritis (OA) in the other compartment or wear on the polyethylene (PE) insert. This study used finite element (FE) analysis to investigate the effects of PE insert contact pressure and stress in opposite compartments for fixed- and mobile-bearing UKA. Analysis was performed using high kinematics displacement and rotation inputs, which were based on the kinematics of the natural knee. ISO standards were used for axial load and flexion. The mobile-bearing PE insert had lower contact pressure than the fixed-bearing PE insert. With the mobile-bearing UKA, lower stress on the opposite compartment reduces the overall risk of progressive OA in the knee. The fixed-bearing UKA increases the overall risk of progressive OA in the knee due to higher stress on the opposite compartment. However, the PE insert of mobile-bearing showed pronounced backside stress at the inferior surface.

Mesenchymal stem cell injections improve symptoms of knee osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and imaging results of patients who received intra-articular injections of autologous mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: The study group comprised 18 patients (6 men and 12 women), among whom the mean age was 54.6 years (range, 41 to 69 years). In each patient the adipose synovium was harvested from the inner side of the infrapatellar fat pad by skin incision extension at the arthroscopic lateral portal site after the patient underwent arthroscopic debridement. After stem cells were isolated, a mean of 1.18 × 10(6) stem cells (range, 0.3 × 10(6) to 2.7 × 10(6) stem cells) were prepared with approximately 3.0 mL of platelet-rich plasma (with a mean of 1.28 × 10(6) platelets per microliter) and injected into the selected knees of patients. Clinical outcome was evaluated with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the Lysholm score, and the visual analog scale (VAS) for grading knee pain. We also compared magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data collected both preoperatively and at the final follow-up. RESULTS: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores decreased significantly (P < .001) from 49.9 points preoperatively to 30.3 points at the final follow-up (mean follow-up, 24.3 months; range, 24 to 26 months). Lysholm scores also improved significantly (P < .001) by the last follow-up visit, increasing from a mean preoperative value of 40.1 points to 73.4 points by the end of the study. Likewise, changes in VAS scores throughout the follow-up period were also significant (P = .005); the mean VAS score decreased from 4.8 preoperatively to 2.0 at the last follow-up visit. Radiography showed that, at the final follow-up point, the whole-organ MRI score had significantly improved from 60.0 points to 48.3 points (P < .001). Particularly notable was the change in cartilage whole-organ MRI score, which improved from 28.3 points to 21.7 points (P < .001). Further analysis showed that improvements in clinical and MRI results were positively related to the number of stem cells injected. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study are encouraging and show that intra-articular injection of infrapatellar fat pad-derived mesenchymal stem cells is effective for reducing pain and improving knee function in patients being treated for knee osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.