Consensus on the assessment of systemic sclerosis-associated primary heart involvement: World Scleroderma Foundation/Heart Failure Association guidance on screening, diagnosis, and follow-up assessment.

Introduction: Heart involvement is a common problem in systemic sclerosis. Recently, a definition of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement had been proposed. Our aim was to establish consensus guidance on the screening, diagnosis and follow-up of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement patients. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to investigate the tests used to evaluate heart involvement in systemic sclerosis. The extracted data were categorized into relevant domains (conventional radiology, electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, laboratory, and others) and presented to experts and one patient research partner, who discussed the data and added their opinion. This led to the formulation of overarching principles and guidance statements, then reviewed and voted on for agreement. Consensus was attained when the mean agreement was ⩾7/10 and of ⩾70% of voters. Results: Among 2650 publications, 168 met eligibility criteria; the data extracted were discussed over three meetings. Seven overarching principles and 10 guidance points were created, revised and voted on. The consensus highlighted the importance of patient counseling, differential diagnosis and multidisciplinary team management, as well as defining screening and diagnostic approaches. The initial core evaluation should integrate history, physical examination, rest electrocardiography, trans-thoracic echocardiography and standard serum cardiac biomarkers. Further investigations should be individually tailored and decided through a multidisciplinary management. The overall mean agreement was 9.1/10, with mean 93% of experts voting above 7/10. Conclusion: This consensus-based guidance on screening, diagnosis and follow-up of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement provides a foundation for standard of care and future feasibility studies that are ongoing to support its application in clinical practice.

Primary systemic sclerosis heart involvement: A systematic literature review and preliminary data-driven, consensus-based WSF/HFA definition.

Introduction: Primary heart involvement in systemic sclerosis may cause morpho-functional and electrical cardiac abnormalities and is a common cause of death. The absence of a clear definition of primary heart involvement in systemic sclerosis limits our understanding and ability to focus on clinical research. We aimed to create an expert consensus definition for primary heart involvement in systemic sclerosis. Methods: A systematic literature review of cardiac involvement and manifestations in systemic sclerosis was conducted to inform an international and multi-disciplinary task force. In addition, the nominal group technique was used to derive a definition that was then subject to voting. A total of 16 clinical cases were evaluated to test face validity, feasibility, reliability and criterion validity of the newly created definition. Results: In total, 171 publications met eligibility criteria. Using the nominal group technique, experts added their opinion, provided statements to consider and ranked them to create the consensus definition, which received 100% agreement on face validity. A median 60(5-300) seconds was taken for the feasibility on a single case. Inter-rater agreement was moderate (mKappa (95% CI) = 0.56 (0.46-1.00) for the first round and 0.55 (0.44-1.00) for the second round) and intra-rater agreement was good (mKappa (95% CI) = 0.77 (0.47-1.00)). Criterion validity showed a 78 (73-84)% correctness versus gold standard. Conclusion: A preliminary primary heart involvement in systemic sclerosis consensus-based definition was created and partially validated, for use in future clinical research.

Responsiveness of the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium gastrointestinal tract 2.0 (UCLA-SCTC-GIT 2.0)to change in scleroderma patients.

Introduction: Gastrointestinal tract involvement in systemic sclerosis is the most common internal organ involvement. Among the few validated patient-reported outcome measures for gastrointestinal involvement are the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium gastrointestinal tract 2.0 (UCLA-GIT 2.0) and the gastrointestinal problems' visual analog scale (SHAQ-VAS). The latter is a component of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index. Our aim is to compare the responsiveness of the UCLA-GIT 2.0 total score, single domains, upper and lower gastrointestinal domains, and gastrointestinal problems' visual analog scale of the scleroderma HAQ(SHAQ-GI-VAS) to change in gastrointestinal medication. In addition, we evaluated the correlation between the UCLA-GIT 2.0 and SHAQ-GI-VAS scale in our systemic sclerosis population. Methods: One hundred fifteen systemic sclerosis patients attending the University of California Los Angeles and Seattle outpatient clinics with two or more consecutive visits were enrolled in our study. The UCLA-GIT 2.0 and SHAQ_VAS were completed by all patients at both visits; any change in gastrointestinal medication at the baseline visit was reported. UCLA-GIT 2.0 asks about how the gastrointestinal tract affects the patient over the last week; It consists of 34 questions in seven domains (reflux, distension, soilage, diarrhea, social function, emotional wellbeing, and constipation). THE SHAQ-GI-VAS is a 100-mm horizontal VAS that asks the patient; "In the past week, how much did your gastrointestinal symptoms interfere with your function". These measures were evaluated at two consecutive visits. Any change in gastrointestinal medication at baseline visit was reported. Percent change was calculated to evaluate the change in the values of the UCLA-GIT 2.0 and the SHAQ_GI-VAS, and we dichotomized the patients into two groups according to whether there was a change in gastrointestinal treatment or not. Pearson correlation was used to correlate both tests at baseline. Results: Ninety-eight (85%) of the systemic sclerosis patients were females, mean age: 52 years (standard deviation ± 12.9); median disease duration: 7 (range: 4-11 years), diffuse subtype: 57 patients (50%), median baseline gastrointestinal tract 2.0 was 0.3 (0.1-0.7) and median baseline SHAQ-GI-VAS was 0.8 (0-4.1). Out of the 115 patients, 41 (37.0%) patients needed a change in gastrointestinal medication at baseline visit (Group 1); they were compared to those not changing gastrointestinal medications (Group 2). Responsiveness to gastrointestinal medication treatment change in the form of percent change in total UCLA-GIT 2.0 was significantly more in Group 1 than in Group 2 (-6.6 (standard deviation = 20) in Group 1 vs +6.9 (standard deviation ± 18.8) in Group 2, p value < 0.001). On the contrary, there was no statistically significant difference between percent changes in SHAQ-GI-VAS from the in Group 1 versus Group 2 (59.5 (standard deviation ± 172) in Group 1 vs 51.9 (standard deviation ± 126.4) in Group 2, p value = 0.816). The correlation between the UCLA-GIT 2.0 and the SHAQ_GI-VAS was moderate (r = 0.6). Conclusion: The University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium gastrointestinal tract 2.0 and gastrointestinal problems' visual analog scale are utilized to measure gastrointestinal tract involvement in systemic sclerosis. Unlike the gastrointestinal problems' visual analog scale, the gastrointestinal tract 2.0 was responsive to change in gastrointestinal medication while the SHAQ-GI-VAS was not. Hence, the UCLA-GIT 2.0 could be utilized in future trials and observational studies as a measure of systemic sclerosis gastrointestinal responsiveness.

Prevalence, correlates and outcomes of gastric antral vascular ectasia in systemic sclerosis: a EUSTAR case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence, determine the subgroups at risk, and the outcomes of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE). METHODS: We queried the European League Against Rheumatism Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) network for the recruitment of patients with SSc-GAVE. Each case was matched for cutaneous subset and disease duration with 2 controls with SSc recruited from the same center, evaluated at the time the index case made the diagnosis of GAVE. SSc characteristics were recorded at the time GAVE occurred and the last observation was collected to define the outcomes. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients with SSc and GAVE were included (24 with diffuse cutaneous SSc) and compared to 93 controls with SSc. The prevalence of GAVE was estimated at about 1% of patients with SSc. By multivariate analysis, patients with SSc-GAVE more frequently exhibited a diminished (< 75%) DLCO value (OR 12.8; 95% CI 1.9-82.8) despite less frequent pulmonary fibrosis (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.1-0.6). GAVE was also associated with the presence of anti-RNA-polymerase III antibodies (OR 4.6; 95% CI 1.2-21.1). SSc-GAVE was associated with anemia (82%) requiring blood transfusion (45%). Therapeutic endoscopic procedures were performed in 45% of patients with GAVE. After a median followup of 30 months (range 1-113 months), survival was similar in patients with SSc-GAVE compared to controls, but a higher number of scleroderma renal crisis cases occurred (12% vs 2%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: GAVE is rare and associated with a vascular phenotype, including anti-RNA-polymerase III antibodies, and a high risk of renal crisis. Anemia, usually requiring blood transfusions, is a common complication.