Adult height in short children born SGA treated with growth hormone and gonadotropin releasing hormone analog: results of a randomized, dose-response GH trial.

CONTEXT: GH treatment is effective in improving height in short children born small for gestational age (SGA). GH is thought to have limited effect when started during adolescence. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate GH treatment efficacy in short SGA children when treatment was started during adolescence; to assess whether GH 2 mg/m(2) · d during puberty improves adult height (AH) compared with 1 mg/m(2) · d; and to assess whether an additional 2-yr postponement of puberty by GnRH analog (GnRHa) improves AH in children who are short at the start of puberty (<140 cm), with a poor AH expectation. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: In this longitudinal, randomized, dose-response GH trial, we included 121 short SGA children (60 boys) at least 8 yr of age. We performed intention-to-treat analyses on all children and uncensored case analyses on 84 children who reached AH. Besides, we evaluated growth during 2 yr of combined GH/GnRHa and subsequent GH treatment until AH in a subgroup of 40 pubertal children with a height of less than 140 cm at the start. RESULTS: Short SGA children started treatment at a median age of 11.2 yr, when 46% had already started puberty. Median height increased from -2.9 at start to -1.7 sd score (SDS) at AH (P < 0.001). Treatment with GH 2 vs. 1 mg/m(2) · d during puberty resulted in significantly better AH (P = 0.001), also after correction for gender, age at start, height SDS at start, treatment years before puberty, and target height SDS. AH was similar in children who started puberty at less than 140 cm and received GH/GnRHa, compared with children who started puberty greater than 140 cm and received GH only (P = 0.795). CONCLUSION: When started in adolescence, GH treatment significantly improves AH in short SGA children, particularly with GH 2 mg/m(2) · d during puberty. When SGA children are short at the start of puberty, they can benefit from combined GH/GnRHa treatment.

[Adherence in the case of chronic diseases: patient-centred approach is needed]. / Therapietrouw bij chronisch zieken: patiëntgerichte benadering is noodzakelijk.

Adherence to medication is a common problem in chronically ill patients. Three patients are presented who did not or did not fully adhere to their medication: a 3-year-old girl with asthma, a 57-year-old man with COPD and a 16-year-old boy with diabetes. This illustrates that adherence is not determined by age or illness. Known determinants of adherence are the patient's beliefs about illness and medication. Since these beliefs differ from patient to patient, dealing with non-adherence requires patient-centred care characterized by concordance, i.e. shared decision-making about therapy by doctors and patients. Appropriately targeted interventions, such as motivational interviewing, may influence patient beliefs and improve adherence.

Overnight levels of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and growth hormone before and during gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue treatment in short boys born small for gestational age.

AIMS: To evaluate if 3 months of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) treatment results in sufficient suppression of pubertal luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) profile patterns in short pubertal small for gestational age (SGA) boys. To compare growth hormone (GH) profiles and fasting insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) levels after 3 months of GnRHa treatment with those at baseline. METHODS: After measurement of baseline overnight profiles and IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels, 14 short pubertal SGA boys received leuprorelide acetate depots of 3.75 mg subcutaneously, every 4 weeks. RESULTS: At baseline, mean GH levels were comparable with those of controls, whereas IGF-I and IGFBP-3 standard deviation scores (SDS) were significantly lower than zero SDS. After 3 months of GnRHa treatment, all boys showed clinical arrest of puberty. The area under the curve above zero, mean and maximum LH and FSH had significantly decreased to prepubertal levels. Peak LH during the GnRH agonist test, however, indicated insufficient pubertal suppression in 43% of boys. Overnight GH profile characteristics and IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels did not significantly change. CONCLUSIONS: Puberty was sufficiently suppressed by GnRHa treatment, as shown by the prepubertal LH and FSH profiles. After 3 months of GnRHa treatment, overnight GH profile characteristics had not significantly changed, reflecting that GH levels are comparable for prepubertal and early pubertal boys.