Design of a double acting pneumatic cartilage loading device for magnetic resonance imaging.

Studies of osteoarthritis initiation and progression that measure strain in cartilage require physiological loading levels. Many studies use magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, which necessitates a MR-compatible loading device. In this study, the design and validation of a new device, the cartilage compressive actuator (CCA), is presented. The CCA is designed for high-field (e.g., 9.4 T) small-bore MR scanners, and meets a number of design criteria. These criteria include capability for testing bone-cartilage samples, MR compatibility, constant load and incremental strain application, a water-tight specimen chamber, remote control, and real time displacement feedback. The mechanical components in the final design include an actuating piston, a connecting chamber, and a sealed specimen chamber. An electro-pneumatic system applies compression, and an optical Fibre-Bragg grating (FBG) sensor provides live displacement feedback. A logarithmic relationship was observed between force exerted by the CCA and pressure (R2 = 0.99), with a peak output force of 653 ± 2 N. The relationship between FBG sensor wavelength and displacement was linear when calibrated both outside (R2 = 0.99) and inside (R2 = 0.98) the MR scanner. Average slope was similar between the two validation tests, with a slope of -4.2 nm/mm observed inside the MR scanner and -4.3 to -4.5 nm/mm observed outside the MR scanner. This device meets all design criteria and represents an improvement over published designs. Future work should incorporate a closed feedback loop to allow for cyclical loading of specimens.

Effect of positioning error on the Hilgenreiner epiphyseal angle and the head-shaft angle compared to the femoral neck-shaft angle in children with cerebral palsy.

Children with cerebral palsy (CP) often have changes in proximal femoral geometry. Neck-shaft angle (NSA), Hilgenreiner epiphyseal angle (HEA) and head-shaft angle (HSA) are used to measure these changes. The impact of femoral rotation on HEA/HSA and of ab/adduction on HEA/HSA/NSA is not well known. This study aimed to determine and compare the effect of rotation, ab/adduction and flexion/extension on HEA/HSA/NSA. Radiographic measurements from 384 patients with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I-V were utilized. NSA/HSA for affected hips were used with femoral anteversion averages to create three-dimensional models of 694 hips in children with CP. Each hip was rotated, ab/adducted and flexed/extended to simulate malpositioning. HEA/HSA/NSA of each model were measured in each joint position, and differences from correct positioning were determined. Mean HEA error at 20° of internal/external rotations were -0.60°/3.17°, respectively, with the NSA error of -6.56°/9.94° and the HSA error of -3.69°/1.21°. Each degree of ab/adduction added 1° of the HEA error, with no NSA/HSA error. NSA was most sensitive to flexion. Error for all measures increased with increasing GMFCS level. HEA/HSA were minimally impacted by rotation. NSA error was much higher than HEA/HSA in internal rotation and flexion whereas HEA was sensitive to changes in ab/adduction. Given abduction is more easily detectable on imaging than rotation, HEA may be less affected by positioning errors that are common with children with CP than NSA. HSA was least affected by position changes. HEA/HSA could be robust, complementary measures of hip deformities in children with CP.